Skip to main content

Are We Really Listening? Ageism, Voice, and Older People’s Diversity in Nordic Societies Undergoing Welfare Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Challenges to Ageing in the Rural North

Part of the book series: International Perspectives on Aging ((Int. Perspect. Aging,volume 22))

Abstract

Western governments and policy-makers generally agree that older people should be included in the discourse on how their welfare needs are met, notwithstanding declining welfare provisions. In this chapter I argue that both the socio-cultural context for older people’s participation in policy development, and the manner in which it is sought, militate against hearing the “authentic” voices of older people. When policy makers fail to meet challenges to the status quo in their knowledge about ageing, policy development continues to occur within dichotomous contradictory frameworks that characterize late life as decline, disease, and decay, or as productive and active. Thus they fail to include diversity in older people’s abilities, resources, needs, desires, and opportunities. When researchers inadequately address the complexities of accessing the voices of older people they fail in their listening.

I begin by commenting on how older people are constructed within the evolving welfare context. I then introduce the idea of “authentic voice” and its links, first to the emergence of critical gerontology, and more recently to “age studies” that incorporate cultural studies, the arts, and humanities. Taking an historical and global perspective I select examples from government policy-making and academic research to illustrate and explore how policy and research frameworks combine to contain and constrain older people’s voices. Finally I discuss the need for policy makers, and researchers to support older people’s agency by revisiting and reintegrating the slippery concept of “authentic voice” in old age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aronson, J. (1992). Are we really listening? Beyond the official discourse on the needs of older people. Canadian Social Work Review, 9(1), 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, J. (1993). Giving consumers a say in policy development: Influencing policy or just being heard? Canadian Public Policy, 19(2), 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, J., & Neysmith, S. M. (2001). Manufacturing social exclusion in the home care market. Canadian Public Policy, 27(2), 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalon, L., & Tesch-Römer, C. (Eds.). (2018). Contemporary perspectives on ageism (International perspectives on aging 19). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8_1.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baars, J., & Phillipson, C. (2013). Introduction. In J. Baars, J. Dohmen, A. Grenier, & C. Phillipson (Eds.), Ageing, meaning and social structure: Connecting critical and humanistic gerontology. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Band-Winterstein, T., Doron, I., & Naim, S. (2012). Elder self neglect: A geriatric syndrome or a life course story? Journal of Aging Studies, 26(2), 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, R. L., & Williamson, J. B. (2011). Social policy and the internal dynamics of the senior rights movement. Journal of Aging Studies, 25(1), 22–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S. (1997). Choosing not to be old? Masks, bodies, and identity management in later life. Ageing and Society, 17(5), 553–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J. (1972). The concept of need. New Society, 30, 640–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. (2017). Creating counter-stories: Critical clinical practice and feminist narrative therapy. In D. Baines (Ed.), Doing anti-oppressive practice: Social justice social work (3rd ed., pp. 212–232). Halifax/Winnipeg: Fernwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bytheway, B., Ward, R., Holland, C., & Peace, S. (2007). The road to an age-inclusive society. In M. Bernard & T. Scharf (Eds.), Critical perspectives on ageing societies (pp. 105–121). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Centre for Elder Law (CCEL). (2013, September). Your words are worth something: Identifying barriers to the well-being of older women. Women’s Dialogue Project Report (Report No. 6). Vancouver: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, S. (2012). Care culture and creativity: A disability perspective on long-term residential care. In P. Armstrong & S. Braedley (Eds.), Troubling care: Critical perspectives on research and practices (pp. 47–58). Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, T. R. (1993). Preface. In T. R. Cole, W. A. Achenbaum, P. L. Jakobi, & R. Kastenbaum (Eds.), Voices and visions of aging: Toward a critical gerontology (pp. vii–vxi). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, L. S., Mason, P. A., Bagley, M. C., Steinsaltz, D., Stefanovska, A., Bernjak, A., McClintock, P. V. E., Phillips, A. C., Upton, J., Latimer, J. E., & Davis, T. (2014). Understanding ageing: Biological and social perspectives. In A. Walker (Ed.), The new science of ageing (pp. 25–75). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillaway, H. E., & Byrnes, M. (2009). Reconsidering successful aging: A call for renewed and expanded academic critiques and conceptualizations. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28(6), 702–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, A. (2007). Introduction: Trust, citizenship and exclusion in the risk society. In The Law Commission of Canada (Ed.), Risk and trust: Including or excluding citizens (pp. 7–22). Black Point: Fernwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, J. (1978). The cultural crisis of modern medicine. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, C. L. (1979). The aging enterprise: A critical examination of social policies and services for the aged. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. G., McGrail, K. M., Morgan, S. M., Barer, M. L., & Hertzman, C. (2001). Apocalypse no: Population aging and the future of health care systems. Canadian Journal on Aging, 20(Supplement 1), 160–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, A. (1998). Reflective authenticity: Rethinking the project of modernity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, D., & Stoffman, D. (1996). Boom, bust and echo: Profiting from the demographic shift in the new millenium. Toronto: Macfarlane, Walter, and Ross.

    Google Scholar 

  • Formosa, M. (2014). Four decades of the Universities of the third age: Past present and future. Ageing and Society, 34, 42–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, L., & Walker, A. (2015). Active and successful aging: A European policy perspective. The Gerontologist, 55(1), 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2005). Contexts of aging: Class, cohort, and community. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2009). The power of silver: Age and identity politics in the 21st century. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 21(3), 277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2017). Ageing, corporeality and social divisions in later life. Ageing & Society, 37(8), 1681–1702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, J. F. (1993). Voice and context in a new gerontology. In T. R. Cole, W. A. Achenbaum, P. L. Jakobi, & R. Kastenbaum (Eds.), Voices and visions of aging: Toward a critical gerontology (pp. 46–63). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullette, M. M. (2004). Aged by culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullette, M. M. (2011). Agewise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gullette, M. M. (2017). Ending ageism or how not to shoot old people. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, F. (2005). Old rage and the issue of mistreatment and neglect of older people. MSW thesis. School of Social Work, Dalhousie University, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison, J. R. with Coughlan, S., Karabanow, J., VanderPlaat, M., Wildeman, S., & Wexler, E. (2016). Contesting elder abuse and neglect: Ageism, risk, and the rhetoric of rights in the mistreatment of older people. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, P., & Gilleard, C. (2015). Rethinking old age: Theorizing the fourth age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jumisko, E. (2016). Elderly homecare recipients’ experiences of home care: Client centred or not? In P. Naskali, M. Seppänen, & S. Begum (Eds.), Ageing, wellbeing and climate change in the Arctic: An interdisciplinary analysis (pp. 164–177). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, S. (1996). Disciplining old age: The formation of gerontological knowledge. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, S. (2005). Busy bodies: Activity, aging and the management of everyday life. In S. Katz (Ed.), Cultural aging: Life course, lifestyle, and senior worlds (pp. 121–139). Peterborough: Broadview Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, S., & Calasanti, T. (2015). Critical perspectives on successful aging: Does it “appeal more than it illuminates”? The Gerontologist, 55(1), 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, S., & Laliberte-Rudman, D. (2005). Exemplars of retirement: Identity and agency between lifestyle and social movement. In S. Katz (Ed.), Cultural aging: Life course, lifestyle, and senior worlds (pp. 140–160). Peterborough: Broadview Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, S. R. (1994). The social construction of frailty: An anthropological perspective. Journal of Aging Studies, 8(1), 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley-Moore, J. (2010). Disability and aging: The social construction of causality. In D. Dannefer & C. Phillipson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social gerontology (pp. 96–110). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keskitali-Foley, S., & Naskali, P. (2016). Tracing gender in political ageing strategies and the press in Finnish Lapland. In P. Naskali, M. Seppänen, & S. Begum (Eds.), Ageing, wellbeing and climate change in the Arctic: An interdisciplinary analysis. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, N. A. (2009). Outliving civil rights. Washington University Law Review, 86(5), 1053–1115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, N. A. (2012). A civil rights approach to elder law. In I. Doron & A. M. Soden (Eds.), Beyond elder law (pp. 19–34). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kvist, J., Fritzell, J., Hvinden, B., & Kangas, O. (2012). Changing social equality: The Nordic welfare model in the 21st century. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laceulle, H. (2017). Ageing and the ethics of authenticity. The Gerontologist, 00(00), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx037. Advance Access publication May 2, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laliberte Rudman, D. (2006). Shaping the active, autonomous and responsible modern retiree: An analysis of discursive technologies and their links with neo-liberal political rationality. Ageing & Society, 26(2), 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S. (2014). Permanent personhood or meaningful decline? Toward a critical anthropology of successful aging. Journal of Aging Studies, 29, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansley, P. (2012). Multi-disciplinarity, user engagement and the design of special programs of ageing research in the United Kingdom. Ageing & Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X12000190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, P. (1989). A fresh map of life. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindh, T. (2012). Social investment in the ageing populations of Europe. In N. Morel, B. Palier, & J. Palme (Eds.), Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies and challenges (pp. 261–284). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macey, D. (2001). The penguin dictionary of critical theory. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson and Minkler. (2006). Civic engagement and older adults: A critical perspective. The Gerontologist, 46(3), 318–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, S. A., & Rozanova, J. (2011). Canada’s aging population (1986) redux. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30(3), 511–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie-Mohr, S., & Lafrance, M. N. (2017). Narrative resistance in social work research and practice: Counter-storying in the pursuit of social justice. Qualitative Social Work, 16(2), 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, H. R. (1993). Overview: What is critical gerontology and why is it important. In T. R. Cole, W. A. Achenbaum, P. L. Jakobi, & R. Kastenbaum (Eds.), Voices and visions of aging: Toward a critical gerontology (pp. xv–xli). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, C., Drennan, J., Lyons, I., & Lafferty, A. (2013). The relationship between older people’s awareness of the term elder abuse and actual experiences of elder abuse. International Psychogeriatrics, 25(8), 1257–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neysmith, S., & Macadam, M. (1999). Controversial concepts. In S. Neysmith (Ed.), Critical issues for future social work practice with aging persons (pp. 1–26). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, T. (2006). Towards a post-Foucauldian sociology of aging. In J. Powell & A. Wahidin (Eds.), Foucault and aging (pp. 183–196). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, C. (2013). Ageing. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploeg, J., Lofeld, & Walsh, C. A. (2013). What is “elder abuse”? Voices from the margin: The views of underrepresented Canadian older adults. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 25(5), 396–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J. L., & Wahidin, A. (2006). Foucault and aging. New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard-Jones, L. (2017). Ageism and autonomy in health care: Explorations through a relational lens. Health Care Analysis, 25(1), 72–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, E., & Grenier, A. (2013). Participation in policy discourse: New form of exclusion for seniors with disabilities. Canadian Journal on Aging, 32(2), 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozanova, J., Dosman, D., & de Jong Gierveld, J. (2008). Participation in rural contexts: Community matters. In N. Keating (Ed.), Rural ageing (pp. 75–86). Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, D. (2016). Sustaining the self in the “fourth age”: A case study. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 17(3), 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1991). The malaise of modernity. Concord: House of Anansi Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twigg, J., & Martin, W. (2015). The challenge of cultural gerontology. The Gerontologist, 55(3), 353–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyk, S. (2016). The othering of old age: Insights from postcolonial studies. Journal of Aging Studies, 39, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera-Sano, P., Barrientos, A., Damodaran, L., Gilhooly, K., Goulding, A., Hennessey, C., et al. (2014). Participation and social connectivity. In A. Walker (Ed.), The new science of ageing (pp. 181–208). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, J. A. (2006). Globalization and critical theory: Political economy of world population issues. In J. Baars, D. Dannefer, C. Phillipson, & A. Walker (Eds.), Aging, globalization and inequality: The new critical gerontology (pp. 245–271). Amityville/New York: Baywood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. (Ed.). (2014). The new science of ageing. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, D., & Mullender, A. (1991). Empowerment and oppression: An indissoluble pairing for contemporary social work. Critical Social Policy, 11(32), 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, K. (1991). Aging and its discontents: Freud and other fictions. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, F., & Scharf, T. (2013). Community-based participatory action research: Opportunities and challenges for critical gerontology. In J. Baars, J. Dohmen, A. Grenier, & C. Phillipson (Eds.), Ageing, meaning and social structure: Connecting critical and humanistic gerontology (pp. 157–179). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan R. Harbison .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Harbison, J.R. (2019). Are We Really Listening? Ageism, Voice, and Older People’s Diversity in Nordic Societies Undergoing Welfare Change. In: Naskali, P., Harbison, J., Begum, S. (eds) New Challenges to Ageing in the Rural North. International Perspectives on Aging, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20603-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20603-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20602-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20603-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics