Advertisement

Continued Togetherness: Couples Preparing for Old Age

  • Olga Asrun StefansdottirEmail author
  • Eydis Kristin Sveinbjarnardottir
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Aging book series (Int. Perspect. Aging, volume 22)

Abstract

In this chapter, we take the position that the individualistic view or perspective of the Icelandic health care system creates challenges to the well-being, agency and human rights of elderly couples. We argue that taking a systems approach is a prerequisite for sound policy decisions, service delivery and research regarding older couples and families. It is important to highlight that older couples are a diverse group of people with different needs and expectations in relation to services. Our research question is: “What challenges are elderly couples in Iceland facing?” We explored the possible answer to our question by reviewing demographic change of the elderly in Iceland, articles and policy documents on elderly couples in the last 5 years. Following the review of the challenges on aging we decided to focus on one of the most current and controversial issue of cohabitation of couples in nursing homes. The results indicated that the service users requested continued togetherness when the partner needed institutional care. The issue of forced separation needs further discussion especially with health professionals themselves. It also needs a greater political will to implement and hence to make changes to accommodate the needs of an aging population in Iceland.

Keywords

Cohabitation Continued togetherness Family Forced separation Challenges Health professionals Iceland New challenge Nursing homes Older couples 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Appreciation expressed to Merrie J. Kaas, Ph.D., APRN, PMHCNS-BC, FAAN, Professor at the School of Nursing at the University of Minnesota USA, for her kind assistance in processing the manuscript in the making.

Special thanks to Joan Harbison, Ph.D, RSW, Adjunct Professor at the School of Social Work at the Dalhousie University Canada, for her good comments on the chapter in the workshop in Umeå, Sweden.

Andrew Paul Hill, Ph.D., Assistant Professor and Director of Police Science, University of Akureyri, Iceland and Audrey Matthews, Ph.D., Principal Lecturer (PL) in Chemistry and a Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy (SFHEA), for their language check in British English of the chapter.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to authorship, and/or publication of this chapter.

References

  1. Andrason, R. H. (2013). Kerfisbundin greining þjónustukerfa [Systematic analysis of services]. In S. Halldorsdottir (Ed.), Handbók í aðferðarfræði rannsókna [Handbook in research methology] (pp. 525–535). Akureyri: Háskólinn á Akureyri.Google Scholar
  2. Arnason V. (2004). Sjálfræði í aðstæðum aldraðra. [Self-determination in the environment of the elderly]. In Astridur Stefansdottir og V Arnason (Ed.), Sjálfræði og aldraðir [Self-determination and elderly] Reykjavík: Siðfræðistofnun og Háskólaútgáfan.Google Scholar
  3. Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. Northvale: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  4. Braithwaite, D. O. (2002). “Married widowhood”: Maintaining Couplehood when one spouse is living in a nursing home. Southern Communication Journal, 67(2), 160–179.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940209373227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bülow, M. H., & Söderqvist, T. (2014). Successful ageing: A historical overview and critical analysis of a successful concept. Journal of Aging Studies, 31(Supplement C), 139–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2014.08.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chesla, C. A. (2010). Do family interventions improve health? Journal of Family Nursing, 16(4), 355–377.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840710383145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Combrinck-Graham, L. (2014). Being family systems thinker: A psychiatrist’s personal odyssey. Family Process, 53(3), 476–488.  https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eika, M., Espnes, G. A., Söderhamn, O., & Hvalvik, S. (2014). Experiences faced by next of kin during their older family members’ transition into long-term care in a Norwegian nursing home. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(15–16), 2186–2195.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harrefors, C., Sävenstedt, S., & Axelsson, K. (2009). Elderly people’s perceptions of how they want to be cared for: An interview study with healthy elderly couples in Northern Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 23(2), 353–360.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00629.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hårtveit, H., & Jensen, P. (2008). Familien-plus én (2nd ed.). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  11. Ho, J., & Raymo, J. M. (2009). Expectations and realization of joint retirement among dual-worker couples. Research on Aging, 31(2), 153–179.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027508328308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Houlfort, N., Fernet, C., Vallerand, R. J., Laframboise, A., Guay, F., & Koestner, R. (2015). The role of passion for work and need satisfaction in psychological adjustment to retirement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88(Supplement C), 84–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Isaac, S., & Michael, W. B. (1995). Handbook in research and evaluation (3rd ed.). San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Services.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, R. A., & Bibbo, J. (2014). Relocation decisions and constructing the meaning of home: A phenomenological study of the transition into a nursing home. Journal of Aging Studies, 30(Supplement C), 56–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2014.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kielhofner, G. (2008). Model of human occupation: Theory and application (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  16. Lundh, U., Sandberg, J., & Nolan, M. (2000). “I don’t have any other choice”: Spouses’ experiences of placing a partner in a care home for older people in Sweden. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(5), 1178–1186.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01588.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martin, L., Miranda, B., & Bean, M. (2008). An exploration of spousal separation and adaptation to long-term disability: Six elderly couples engaged in a horticultural programme. Occupational Therapy International, 15(1), 45–55.  https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Müller C., Lautenschläger, S., Meyer, G., & Stephan, A. (2017). Interventions to support people with dementia and their caregivers during the transition from home care to nursing home care: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 71, 139–152 . doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.03.013.Google Scholar
  19. Nichols, M. P. (2010). Family therapy: Concepts and methods (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  20. Rivett, M., & Street, E. (2009). Family therapy: 100 key points and techniques. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Söderberg, M., Ståhl, A., & Emilsson, U. M. (2012). Family members‘strategies when their elderly relatives consider relocation to a residential home: Adapting, representing and avoiding. Journal of Aging Studies, 26, 495–503.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2012.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sveinbjarnardottir, E. K., Svavarsdottir, E. K., & Wright, L. M. (2013). What are the benefits of a short therapeutic conversation intervention with acute psychiatric patients and their families? A controlled before and after study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50, 593–602.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.10.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Syse, A., Solem, P. E., Ugreninov, E., Mykletun, R., & Furunes, T. (2014). Do spouses coordinate their work exits?: A combined survey and register analysis from Norway. Research on Aging, 36(5), 625–650.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027513516151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Trudel, G., Turgeon, L., & Piché, L. (2010). Marital and sexual aspects of old age. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25(3), 316–341.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681991003750467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). The general system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: Georg Braziller.Google Scholar
  26. Wright, L. M., & Bell, J. M. (2009). Beliefs and illness: A model for healing (4th ed.). Calgary: Floor Press, Inc.Google Scholar

Data

    Public Media (Interviews and Newspaper Articles)

    1. Arnarsson, S. (2017, April 6). Stíað í sundur eftir 65 ára hjónaband [Force to separate after 65 years of marriage]. Visir. http://www.visir.is/g/2017170409403. Accessed 4 May 2018.
    2. Bleikt (2013, April 15). Nýtt úrræði: Nú geta hjón búið samtímis á Hrafnistu [New resource: Now couple can cohabit in Hrafnista]. http://bleikt.pressan.is/lesa/nytt-urraedi-nu-geta-hjon-buid-samtimis-a-hrafnistu/. Accessed 5 June 2016.
    3. Hreidarson, M. H. (2017, March 19). Gamalt fólk flutt í Vík í Mýrdal:fjölskyldurnar segja það lítilsvirðingu að leggja þetta á fólkið [Older people moved to Vík í Mýrdal: The families say it is contempt to put them through it]. Visir. http://www.visir.is/g/2017170318687. Accessed 19 Mar 2017.
    4. Lifdu nuna. (2015, Oct 16). Eftirlaunaaldurinn þarf ekki að eyðileggja hjónabandið [Pension age does not have to ruin the marriage] https://lifdununa.is/grein/eftirlaunaaldurinn-tharf-ekki-ad-eydileggja-hjonabandid/. Accessed 5 May 2018.
    5. Mbl. (2013, April 16). Nýtt búsetuúrræði fyrir hjón á Hrafnistu [New resource for couples in Hrafnista]. https://www.mbl.is/greinasafn/grein/1462351/. Accessed 4 May 2016.
    6. Mbl (2017, November 22). Helgi í Góu skorar á lífeyrissjóðina [Helgi in Goa challenges the pension funds]. https://www.mbl.is/vidskipti/frettir/2017/11/22/helgi_i_gou_skorar_a_lifeyrissjodina/. Accessed 31 Jan 2018.
    7. Ruv (2013a, January 16). Vill skoða aðskilnað aldraðra með ríkinu [Want to consider the separation of the elderly with the state]. http://www.ruv.is/frett/vill-skoda-adskilnad-aldradra-med-rikinu. Accessed 17 Feb 2017.
    8. Ruv (2013b, November 29). Fjórtán nýjar íbúðir fyrir aldraðra [Fourteen new apartments for elderly people]. http://www.ruv.is/frett/fjortan-nyjar-ibudir-fyrir-aldrada. Accessed 16 Nov 2016.
    9. Sigurthorsdottir, S. K. (2017, February 23). Vilja tryggja öldruðum rétt til sambúðar [Want to ensure the right of elderly to cohabitation]. Visir. http://www.visir.is/g/2017170229483. Accessed 23 Feb 2017.

    Governmental Reports, Laws and Amendments in the Icelandic Parliament

    1. Acts on the affairs of the elderly no.125/1999 [Lög um málefni aldraðra nr.125/1999].Google Scholar
    2. Acts on the social security no.100/200 [Lög um almannatryggingar nr.100/2007].Google Scholar
    3. Directorate of Health. (2016). Talnabrunnur [Health statistics]. https://www.landlaeknir.is/utgefid-efni/skjal/item29751/. Accessed 5 Oct 2017.
    4. Ministry of Welfare. (2013). Samkomulag um tilraunaverkefni á milli Velferðarráðherra og Hrafnistu. [Collaboration pilot project between Hrafnista nursing home and the Welfare Minister in Iceland]. https://www.stjornarradid.is/efst-a-baugi/frettir/stok-frett/2013/01/23/Tilraunaverkefni-a-Hrafnistu-um-sameiginlegt-busetuform-fyrir-hjon/. Accessed 3 Oct 2017.
    5. Ministry of Welfare. (2014). Aldraðir í hjúkrunarrýmum á hjúkrunarheimilum. [Report on policy issues of the affairs of the elderly in the year 2014]. https://www.stjornarradid.is/media/velferdarraduneyti-media/media/rit-og-skyrslur-2014/VEL-Lokaskyrsla-2014.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2018.
    6. Ministry of Welfare. (2016). Mótun stefnu í þjónustu við aldraða til næstu ára. Tillögur samstarfsnefndar um málefni aldraðra till félags- og húsnæðisráðherra [Report on policy issues of the affairs of the elderly in the year 2016]. https://www.stjornarradid.is/media/velferdarraduneyti-media/media/skyrslur2016/Motun_stefnu_i_thjonustu_vid_aldrada_02092016.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2016.
    7. Parliamentary document 252 [Þingskjal 252]. (2017–2018). Frumvarp til laga um breytingar á lögum um heilbrigðisþjónustu, nr. 40/2007 og lögum um málefni aldraðra, nr.125/1999 með síðari breytingum (réttur til einbýlis og sambúðar við maka á öldrunarstofnunum) [Amendment to the Law on Health Service no. 40/2007 and the Law on the affairs of the elderly no.125/1999]. Alþingistíðindi A-deild. https://www.althingi.is/altext/148/s/0252.html. Accessed 2 May 2018.
    8. Parliamentary document 256 [Þingskjal 256]. (2016–2017). Frumvarp til laga um breytingar á lögum aldraðra, nr.125/1999 (réttur til sambúðar á stofnunum) [Amendment to the Law on the affairs of the elderly no.125/1999] Alþingistíðindi A-deild. https://www.althingi.is/altext/146/s/0256.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2017.
    9. Parliamentary document 452 [Þingskjal 452] (2015–2016). Frumvarp til laga um breytingar á lögum aldraðra, nr.125/1999 [Amendment to the Law on the affairs of the elderly no.125/1999]. Alþingistíðindi A-deild. https://www.althingi.is/altext/145/s/0452.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2017.
    10. Petursson, G. (2007). Older people on the labour market in Iceland: Public policy and measures within continuing education. http://pdf.mutual-learning-employment.net/pdf/IS07/Official_paper_IS07.pdf. Accessed 7 Oct 2017.
    11. Prime Minister’s Office. (2002). Nefnd um sveigjanleg starfslok: lokaskýrsla október 2002. [Prime Minister Committee on flexible retirement]. https://www.stjornarradid.is/media/forsaetisraduneyti-media/media/Skyrslur/sveigjanl-starfsl-pdf.pdf. Accessed 7 Oct 2017.
    12. Regeringens proposition 2011/12:147. Rätten att få åldras tillsammans: en fråga om skälighet, värdighet och välbefinnande i äldreomsorgen [Parliamentary document on the right for couples to cohabite at nursing homes] (pp. 8, 9, 13, 26, 39). http://www.regeringen.se/rattsdokument/proposition/2012/05/prop.-201112147/. Accessed 7 Oct 2017.
    13. Regulation on the assessment of the need of the elderly for a nursing facility placement no.466/2012 [Reglugerð um færni- og heilsumat vegna dvalar- og hjúkrunarrýma nr.466/2012]. https://www.reglugerd.is/reglugerdir/allar/nr/466-2012. Accessed 4 Oct 2017.
    14. Social Science Research Institute. (2017). Analysis of health and wellbeing of elderly in Iceland. http://fel.hi.is/greining_a_hogum_og_lidan_aldradra_a_islandi_2016. Accessed 4 Aug 2017.
    15. Statistics Iceland. (2017). Population projections in Iceland. https://hagstofa.is/talnaefni/ibuar/mannfjoldaspa/. Accessed 4 Aug 2017.

    Icelandic Research

    1. Sigurdardottir, S. H., & Bravell, M. E. (2013). Older caregivers in Iceland: Providing and receiving care. Nordic Social Work Research, 3(1), 4–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2013.768180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    2. Sigurdardottir, S. H., & Kåreholt, I. (2014). Informal and formal care of older people in Iceland. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 28, 802–811.  https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    3. Stefansdottir. (2015). Success and freedom. Couples experience after retirement. http://hdl.handle.net/1946/21496 Accessed 5 Oct 2017. Unpublished master’s thesis.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olga Asrun Stefansdottir
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eydis Kristin Sveinbjarnardottir
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Health SciencesUniversity of AkureyriAkureyriIceland

Personalised recommendations