Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Building Bridges Through Talk: Exploring the Role of Dialogue in Developing Bridging Social Capital

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theoretical Approaches to Multi-Cultural Positive Psychological Interventions

Abstract

This chapter examines the role of dialogue in building connections across socio-cultural and ideological divides. Applying the lens of dialogue, it seeks to promote bridging social capital in an increasingly fragmented and polarized society. Social capital is often seen as the glue that holds societies together. The central idea of social capital is that social networks and relationships matter, and provide individuals and groups with useful and beneficial resources in two ways. Bonding social capital refers to horizontal ties between individuals within the same social group who are similar to each other. Bridging social capital refers to ties between individuals or social groups who are dissimilar and which cross socio-economic and cultural divides. For a stable and healthy society, both forms of social capital are needed, but especially bridging social capital is important for reconciling democracy and diversity. Moreover, social relationships with others have a positive impact on individuals’ well-being and life-satisfaction. This chapter explores the crossroads of two related, yet separated, areas of scholarship, namely social capital and dialogue studies. By reviewing their literatures and identifying areas where these disciplines might be brought together, it aims to demonstrate how dialogue can be used as a positive intervention to create bridging social capital. It will show how characteristics of dialogue foster the process of relationship building between people who are different. However, to successfully intervene in the formation of bridging social capital, it is crucial to consider the context in which it is built and maintained. Therefore, research needs to examine the purpose (why), the places (where), and the people (who) in the process (how) of building bridging social capital. As communication is crucial to cultivate relationships, this chapter asserts that creating bridging social capital is essentially a communicative accomplishment. The underlying long-term and challenging goal of building bridges through talk is to promote a more inclusive, empathetic, civil, and compassionate society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amati, V., Meggiolaro, S., Rivellini, G., & Zaccarin, S. (2018). Social relations and life satisfaction: The role of friends. Genus, 74(1), 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayios, A., Jeurissen, R., Manning, P., & Spence, L. J. (2013). Social capital: A review from an ethics perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, B., & Cushing, R. G. (2009). The big sort: Why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. Boston: Mariner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, L. W. (2008). Deliberation, storytelling, and dialogic moments. Communication Theory, 18(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00315.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blankenhorn, D. (2015, December 22). Why polarization matters. The American Interest. Retrieved from https://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/12/22/why-polarization-matters/.

  • Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. Zaltbommel, The Netherlands: Schouten & Nelissen.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Eds.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. (2017). Braving the wilderness: The quest for true belonging and the courage to stand alone. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbaugh, D., Boromisza-Habashi, D., & Ge, X. (2006). Dialogue in cross-cultural perspective. In N. Aalto & E. Reuter (Eds.), Aspects of intercultural dialogue (pp. 27–46). Köln: SAXA Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claridge, T. (2018a, January 20). Structural, cognitive, relational social capital. Retrieved from https://www.socialcapitalresearch.com/structural-cognitive-relational-social-capital/.

  • Claridge, T. (2018b, January 7). What is bridging social capital? Retrieved from https://www.socialcapitalresearch.com/what-is-bridging-social-capital/.

  • Cloete, A. (2014). Social cohesion and social capital: Possible implications for the common good. Verbum Et Ecclesia, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v35i3.1331.

  • Cicourel, A. V. (1973). Cognitive sociology: Language and meaning in social interaction. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, J. R. (2016). Strategies for building social capital. In A.G. Greenberg et al. (Eds.), Social capital and community well-being, Issues in Children’s and Family’s Lives (pp. 141–159). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33264-2_8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessel, A., Rogge, M., & Garlington, S. (2006). Using intergroup dialogue to promote social justice and change. Social Work, 51(4), 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dessel, A., & Rogge, M. E. (2008). Evaluation of intergroup dialogue: A review of the empirical literature. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 26(2), 199–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryden-Peterson, S. (2010). Bridging home: Building relationships between immigrant and long-time resident youth. Teachers College Record, 112(9), 2320–2351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman. (2018, January 21). Edelman Trust Barometer Executive Summary. Retrieved from https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2018-10/2018_Edelman_TrustBarometer_Executive_Summary_Jan.pdf.

  • Escobar, O. (2009). The dialogic turn: Dialogue for deliberation. In-Spire Journal of Law, Politics and Societies, 4(2), 42–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, O. (2011). Public dialogue and deliberation: A communication perspective for public engagement practitioners. Edinburgh: UK Beacons for Public Engagement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essential Partners. (2018, April). Workshop: The power of dialogue, constructive conversations on divisive issues. Cambridge, MA: Essential Partners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedkin, N. (1982). Information flow through strong and weak ties in inter-organizational social networks. Social Networks, 3(4), 273–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyma, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2018). Identity politics: The demand for dignity and the politics of resentment. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakanson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relationships on business networks. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häuberer, J. (2011). Social capital theory: Towards a methodological foundation. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaney, C. A., & Israel, B. A. (2008). Social networks and social support. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice. A Wiley Imprint: San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzig, M., & Chasin, L. (2006). Fostering dialogue across divides: A nuts and bolts guide from essential partners. Cambridge, MA: Essential Partners.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., & Sohn, D. (2016). Mapping the social capital research in communication. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(4), 728–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015610074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillbacka, R. (2006). Measuring social capital. Acta Sociologica, 49(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699306064774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder, S. H. (2001). An inquiry into dialogue, its challenges and justifications. International Journal of Public Administration, 24(7–8), 652–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, R. A., & Van Til, J. (Eds.). (2011). Resolving community conflicts and problems; Public deliberation and sustained dialogue. New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiese, M. (2003, September). Dialogue. Beyond intractability. Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. Retrieved from: https://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/dialogue.

  • Mauss, M. (1954). The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muelhoff, T., & Langer, R. (2017). Winsome persuasion. Christian influence in a post-Christian world. Downers Grove, IL: Inter Varsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagda, A., Gurin, P., Sorensen, N., & Zúñiga, X. (2009). Evaluating intergroup dialogue: Engaging diversity for personal and social responsibility. Diversity & Democracy, 12(1), 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001). The well-being of nations. The role of human and social capital. Paris: OECD Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2002). Social capital and social wellbeing. Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. (2011). Sustained dialogue and public deliberation: Making the connection. In R. A. Lohman & J. van Til (Eds.), Resolving community conflicts and problems; Public deliberation and sustained dialogue. New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, W. B., & Pearce, K. A. (2004). Taking a communication perspective on dialogue. In R. Anderson, L. A. Baxter, & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue. Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 39–56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prati, G., Cicognani, E., & Cinzia, A. (2017). The influence of school sense of community on students’ well-being: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 917–924. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. American Prospect, 13, 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of american community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., Feldstein, L. M., & Cohen, D. (2004). Better together: Restoring the American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, H., Shah, D. V., & Friedland, L. A. (2011). A communicative approach to social capital. Journal of Communication, 61(4), 689–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01571.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostila, M. (2010). The facets of social capital. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(3), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2010.00454.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sander, T. H., & Lowney, K. (2006). Social Capital Building Toolkit, version 1.2. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University J. F. Kennedy School of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller, T., Baron, S., & Field, J. (2000). Social capital: A review and critique. In S. Baron, J. Field, & T. Schuller (Eds.), Social capital: Critical perspectives (pp. 1–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stains, R. (2016). Cultivating courageous communities through the practice and power of dialogue. Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 42(5), 1518–1545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J., & Zediker, K. (2000). Dialogue as tensional, ethical practice. Southern Journal of Communication, 65(2–3), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940009373169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress (CMEPSP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (2013). The argument culture: Agonism & the Common Good. Daedalus, 142(2), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, E., Pate, S., & Ranson, A. (2015). The crosstown initiative: Art, community, and placemaking in memphis. Community Psychology, 55, 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9691-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2016). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Kroon, S. M. A., Ten Pierick, E., De Vlieger, J. J., Backus, G. B. C., & King R. P. (2002). Social capital and communication. The Hague: Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Deth, J. W. (2003). Measuring social capital: Orthodoxies and continuing controversies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570305057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatanathan, J., Karapanos, E., Kostakos, V., & Gonçalves, J. (2012). Network, personality and social capital. In WebSci ‘12: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Web Science Conference (pp. 326–329). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2380718.2380760.

  • Villalonga-Olives, E., Adams, I., & Kawachi, I. (2016). The development of a bridging social capital questionnaire for use in population health research. SSM—Population Health, 2, 613–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.08.008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D. (2000). The place of dialogue theory in logic, computer science and communication studies. Synthese, 123(3), 327–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieseke, J., Kraus, F., Ahearne, M., & Mikolon, S. (2012). Multiple identification Foci and their countervailing effects on salespeople’s negative headquarters stereotypes. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrzesniewski, A., Dutton, J. E., & Debebe, G. (2003). Interpersonal sensemaking and the meaning of work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 93–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25003-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zúñiga, X. (2003). Bridging differences through dialogue. About Campus, 7(6), 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Linda Doornbosch-Akse & Mark van Vuuren

Authors
  1. Linda Doornbosch-Akse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark van Vuuren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Doornbosch-Akse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Human Performance Management Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands

    Llewellyn Ellardus Van Zyl

  2. Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University Vaal Triangle Campus, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa

    Sebastiaan Rothmann Sr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Doornbosch-Akse, L., van Vuuren, M. (2019). Building Bridges Through Talk: Exploring the Role of Dialogue in Developing Bridging Social Capital. In: Van Zyl, L., Rothmann Sr., S. (eds) Theoretical Approaches to Multi-Cultural Positive Psychological Interventions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20583-6_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation