Abstract
Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is an advanced human–machine interaction technology requiring higher-order cognitive functions for an efficient task execution. The relation between cognition, human performance and psychological state has been studied for many years. Nevertheless, the effect of acute stress on cognitive performance involving BCI systems has never been studied. Nowadays, people are more and more affected by stressful situations. Stress is an important human factor which can impact the ability to appropriately process cognitive information related to language, working memory, attention, or executive control.
Individuals are continuously interacting with technology to execute daily actions. BCI represent an alternative way to allow any individual, even with motor disabilities, to interact with that technology. BCI-P300 Speller is driven by EEG signals and enables communication without physical intervention. It is used in both clinical investigations and fundamental research.
In this work, we study the impact of acute stress effects on cognitive ability to control a BCI-P300 speller. Although we have observed a broad spectrum of response to stress, analyses show a correlation between BCI-speller performance and user’s stress state. We have also noted that BCI performance seems to be improved if users have a good cognitive engagement in the task and if they showed an ability to develop efficient strategies, such as selective attention or increased effort, in order to cope with the stressful situations.
In conclusion, these preliminary results performed on a small sample (n = 7) show that BCI-P300 Speller is a robust and reliable tool and suggest that an optimal utilization of BCI systems could be assured despite the fluctuations of users’ state. We assume that neural mechanisms involved in the BCI task, may set the brain in an adequate level of generalized arousal, which allows establishment of compensatory mechanisms in stressful states.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Garcia, L., et al.: A comparison of a brain-computer interface and an eye tracker: is there a more appropriate technology for controlling a virtual keyboard in an ALS patient? In: Conference: International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (2015)
Polich, J.: Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118(10), 2128–2148 (2007)
Farwell, L.A., Donchin, E.: Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 70(6), 510–523 (1988)
Kleih, S.C., Kübler, A.: Empathy, motivation, and P300 BCI performance. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 17(7), 642 (2013)
Kleih, S.C., Nijboer, F., Halder, S., Kübler, A.: Motivation modulates the P300 amplitude during brain-computer interface use. Clin. Neurophysiol. 121(7), 1023–1031 (2010)
Käthner, I., Wriessnegger, S.C., Müller-Putz, G.R., Kübler, A., Halder, S.: Effects of mental workload and fatigue on the P300, alpha and theta band power during operation of an ERP (P300) brain-computer interface. Biol. Psychol. 102, 118–129 (2014)
Hammer, E.M., Halder, S., Kleih, S.C., Kübler, A.: Prediction of auditory and visual p300 brain-computer interface aptitude. Front. Neurosci. 12, 307 (2018)
Staal, M.A.: Stress, Cognition, and Human Performance: A Literature Review and Conceptual Framework. NASA/TM-2004-212824
Dickerson, S.S., Kemeny, M.E.: Acute stressors and cortisol responses: a theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychol. Bull. 130, 355–391 (2004)
Hockey, G.R.: Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload; a cognitive-energetical framework. Biol. Psychol. 45(1–3), 73–93 (1997)
Kloet, E., Ron Joëls, M., Holsboer, F.: Stress and the brain: from adaptation to disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 463–475 (2005)
Joëls, M., Baram, T.Z.: The neuro-symphony of stress. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10(6), 459–466 (2009)
Elzinga, B.M., Roelofs, K.: Cortisol-induced impairments of working memory require acute sympathetic activation. Behav. Neurosci. 119, 98–103 (2005)
Schwabe, L.: Memory under stress: from single systems to network changes. Eur. J. Neurosci. 45(4), 478–489 (2017)
Lukasik, K.M., Waris, O., Soveri, A., Lehtonen, M., Laine, M.: The relationship of anxiety and stress with working memory performance in a large non-depressed sample. Front. Psychol. 10(4) (2019)
Sänger, J., Bechtold, L., Schoofs, D., Blaszkewicz, M., Wascher, E.: The influence of acute stress on attention mechanisms and its electrophysiological correlates. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 8, 353 (2014)
Fuster, J.M.: Cognitive functions of the prefrontal cortex. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 4, 11–22 (2013)
Velasco-Álvarez, F., Sancha-Ros, S., García-Garaluz, E., Fernández-Rodríguez, A., Medina- Juliá, M.T., Ron-Angevin, R.: UMA-BCI speller: an easily configurable P300 speller tool for end users. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 172, 127–138 (2019)
Owens, M., Stevenson, J., Hadwin, J.A.: Anxiety and depression in academic performance: an exploration of the mediating factors of worry and working memory. Sch. Psychol. Int. 33(4), 433–449 (2012)
Fechir, M., et al.: Patterns of sympathetic responses induced by different stress tasks. Open Neurol. J. 2, 25–31 (2008)
Van Oort, J., et al.: How the brain connects in response to acute stress: a review at the human brain systems level. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 83, 281–297 (2017)
Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.L., Lushene, R.E.: The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press Inc, Palo Alto (1970)
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., Mermelstein, R.: A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 24(4), 385–396 (1983)
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R.L., Williams, J.B.: The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom. Med. 64(2), 258–266 (2002)
Eysenck, M., Derakshan, N.: New perspectives in attentional control theory. Personality Individ. Differ. 50(7), 955–960 (2011)
Kudielka, B.M., Hellhammer, D.H., Wüst, S.: Why do we respond so differently? reviewing determinants of human salivary cortisol responses to challenge. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34, 2–18 (2009)
Gerjets, P., Walter, C., Rosenstiel, W., Bogdan, M., Zander, T.O.: Cognitive state monitoring and the design of adaptive instruction in digital environments: lessons learned from cognitive workload assessment using a passive brain-computer interface approach. Front. Neurosci. 8, 385 (2014)
Pesle, F., Lespinet-Najib, V., Garcia, L., Bougard, C., Diaz, E., Schneider, S.: Profils psychologiques et styles de conduite: Analyse exploratoire multidimensionnelle de la vulnérabilité au stress des conducteurs. ERGO’IA 2018, Bidart, France. Hal-01882632 (2018)
Mendl, M.: Performing under pressure: stress and cognitive function. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 65(3), 221–244 (1999)
Mühl, C., Jeunet, C., Lotte, F.: EEG-based workload estimation across affective contexts. Front. Neurosci. 8, 114 (2014)
Zurrón, M., Lindín, M., Galdo-Alvarez, S., Díaz, F.: Age-related effects on event-related brain potentials in a congruence/incongruence judgment color-word Stroop task. Front. Aging Neurosci. 6, 128 (2014)
Acknowledgement
This work was partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the projects LICOM (DPI2015-67064-R), by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and by the University of Malaga. Moreover, the authors would like to thank all participants for their cooperation. This work has been carried out in a framework agreement between the University of Málaga and IMS Laboratory- CNRS, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux INP – France.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Garcia, L. et al. (2019). Is Stress State an Important Factor in the BCI-P300 Speller Performance?. In: Rojas, I., Joya, G., Catala, A. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. IWANN 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11506. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20521-8_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20521-8_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20520-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20521-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)