Abstract
Instagram, a popular social networking platform, was ranked the number five most popular app by downloads in the first quarter of 2018 [1]. Instagram allows users to share happenings in their lives with other users by posting images and video content. Anyone with an Instagram account can also like and comment on others’ posts. Social media generates attention-seeking behavior and obsessions with getting more likes and positive comments. According to psychologist John Robert Anderson, attention is the behavioral and cognitive process of selectively concentrating on specific information while editing out non-essential information [2]. Which photography posts get more likes and comments? How frequently do people feel truly happy when they use hashtag #happy and/or #happiness on Instagram? How often do people give sincere comments on Instagram posts? In this research, we conducted a content analysis of photography posts tagged with the hashtag #happy and/or #happiness. We downloaded the 200 most recent posts from individual accounts between January 9–20, 2019 from age ranges 10 to 55 years old. 91% of posts were from young adults or millennials (18–35 years old) and only 2% of posts were from adolescent and 7% of posts were from middle-aged adults. The study examined different value of life in happiness on Instagram and user engagement based with different types of photography posts on Attention Theory. The study found that the physical appearance (36%) was considered to be the aspect of happiness that is 15% more than happiness from the relationship and 27% more than happiness from the achievement regardless of biological sex. In addition, the study suggests that females post comments 2.3 times more than males and females click like 1.7 times more than males. Regardless of biological sex, both males and females received significantly larger numbers of insincere comments (85.7%) than sincere comments (13.1%) on their posts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Nelson, R.: The top mobile apps, games, and publishers of Q1 2018: Sensor Tower’s Data Digest (2018). https://sensortower.com/blog/top-apps-games-publishers-q1-2018
Anderson, J.R.: Cognitive Psychology and its Implications. Macmillan, London
Leading countries based on number of Instagram users as of October 2018 (2005). https://www.statista.com/statistics/578364/countries-with-most-instagram-users/
Distribution of Instagram users worldwide as of October 2018, by age and gender. https://www.statista.com/statistics/248769/age-distribution-of-worldwide-instagram-users/
People spend almost as much time on Instagram as they do on Facebook (2018). https://www.recode.net/2018/6/25/17501224/instagram-facebook-snapchat-time-spent-growth-data
Shively, K.: Simply measured Q3 2014 Instagram study (2014)
Top 100 HasTags on Instagram. https://top-hashtags.com/instagram/
Anderson, J.R.: Cognitive Psychology and its Implications. Macmillan, London (2005)
Harvey-Jenner. C.: The psychology of a like: how social media is really affect ing your brain (2017). https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a9931660/psychology-social-media-likes-mental-health-issues/
Bakhshi, S., Shamma, D.A., Gilbert, E.: Faces engage us: photos with faces attract more likes and comments on instagram. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 965–974. ACM (2014)
Asch, S.E.: Forming impressions of personality. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 41(3), 258 (1946)
Hewitt, J.P., Shulman, D.: Self and Society: A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (1979)
Surma, J.: Social exchange in online social networks. The reciprocity phenomenon on Facebook. Comput. Commun. 73, 342–346 (2016)
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27(1), 415–444 (2001)
Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., Perrin, A., Stepler, R., Rainie, H., Parker, K.: Teens, social media & technology overview 2015, pp. 04–09. Pew Research Center, Internet & American Life Project (2015)
Hutt, R.: What do young people value? (2016). https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/what-do-young-people-value/
Alton, L.: Phone Calls, Texts or Email? Here’s how millennials prefer to communicate (2017). https://www.forbes.com/sites/larryalton/2017/05/11/how-do-millennials-prefer-to-communicate/
Silva, C.: The Millennial Obsession With Self-Care (2017).https://www.npr.org/2017/06/04/531051473/the-millennial-obsession-with-self-care
Millennial in Adulthood: Detached from Institutions, Networked with Friends (2014). http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2014/03/07/millennials-in-adulthood/
Li, Q., Kim, Y.A.: Analysis of facial emotion recognition technology and its effectiveness in human interaction. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 217–226. Springer, Cham (2018)
Kim, Y.A.: Emotional evidence: influences on happiness from the frequent positive visual exposure. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomicsm, pp. 227–237. Springer, Cham (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, Q., Kim, Y.A. (2020). Happiness on Instagram – Content Analysis and Engagement Based on Attention Theory. In: Shin, C. (eds) Advances in Interdisciplinary Practice in Industrial Design. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 968. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20470-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20470-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20469-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20470-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)