Abstract
In 2016, the apparel market value for plus sizes in the U.S., was estimated at 20.4 billion dollars. As there is a lack of accessible measurement and sizing standardization in the U.S. for this body type, retailers have developed their own unique systems. This pilot study will explore how a sample of 65 plus size women, through 3D body scans, fit into the top U.S. retailer’s measures and sizes. The retailers investigated, included: Walmart, Kohl’s, JC Penney, Target, Macy’s and Lane Bryant. The findings established that none of the retailers are meeting the needs of the plus size body. Future research must consider methods to improve access to measurements, apparel sizing and product development for this growing demographic.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hales, C.M., Carroll, M.D., Fryar, C.D., Ogden, C.L.: Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States 2015–2016, Data Brief No. 288, October 2017
NPD Group: Plus size women’s apparel market value forecast in the United States from 2015 until 2020. Emarketer, May 2017
Mintel Group Ltd.: Shopping for plus size teens’ and women’s clothing – U.S. Retailers shopped for plus size clothing. Analyst Insights, November 2012
O’Brien, R., Shelton, W. C.: Women’s Measurements For Garment and Pattern Construction. US Department of Agriculture, No. 454 (1941)
Stampler, L.: The bizarre history of women’s clothing sizes, October 2014. http://time.com/3532014/women-clothing-sizes-history/
LaBat, K.L.: Sizing standardization. Sizing in Clothing. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge (2007)
National Bureau of Standards: Body measurements for the sizing of women’s patterns and apparel. Voluntary Product Standard CS 215-58. National Bureau of Standards, US Department of Commerce, Washington D.C (1958)
Ingraham, C.: The absurdity of women’s clothing sizes, in one chart, August 2015. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/08/11/the-absurdity-of-womens-clothing-sizes-in-one-chart/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ca8fe038beeb
National Bureau of Standards: Body measurements for the sizing of women’s patterns and apparel. Voluntary Product Standard PS 42-70. National Bureau of Standards, US Department of Commerce, Washington D.C (1970)
Bold Metrics: Apparel retailers start 2016 with 30% returns – almost a third of all holiday purchases made online will be returned (2015). http://blog.fashionmetric.com/apparel-retailers-start-2016-with-a-30-return-rate/
Ewen, L.: How the future of fit could spell the end of retail returns, July 2016. https://www.retaildive.com/news/how-the-future-of-fit-could-spell-the-end-of-retail-returns/421972/
Reagan, C.: That sweater you don’t like is a trillion-dollar problem for retailers. These companies want to fix it, January 2019. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/10/growing-online-sales-means-more-returns-and-trash-for-landfills.html
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Body Labs (now Amazon) for their support in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sokolowski, S.L., Griffin, L., Silbert, J. (2020). The Variability of U.S. Women’s Plus Size Product Sizing and Self-Identified Size 18 Bodies. In: Shin, C. (eds) Advances in Interdisciplinary Practice in Industrial Design. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 968. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20470-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20470-9_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20469-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20470-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)