Abstract
What is the function of parent–child argumentation? This chapter intends to answer the main research question that has guided the study presented in this volume and open a discussion for future research on this topic. In the first part, the chapter provides a detailed overview of the main findings of the analysis of parent–child argumentative discussions during mealtime. The role played by parents and children in the inception and development of argumentation, and the types of conclusions of their argumentative discussions are described. Subsequently, two educational targets achieved by parents and children through their argumentative interactions are presented and critically discussed. In the last part, new open questions that should guide future investigation to expand our knowledge of the role and function of argumentation between parents and children are proposed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
The term “language socialization” stems from Sapir’s classic 1933 article “Language” in the Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, in which he states (quoted in Sapir, 1949, p. 15): “Language is a great force of socialization, probably the greatest that exists.”
References
Arcidiacono, F., & Bova, A. (2015). Activity-bound and activity-unbound arguments in response to parental eat-directives at mealtimes: Differences and similarities in children of 3–5 and 6–9 years old. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 6, 40–55.
Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2013). Investigating children’s Why-questions: A study comparing argumentative and explanatory function. Discourse Studies, 15(6), 713–734.
Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2015). Beyond conflicts: Origin and types of issues leading to argumentative discussions during family mealtimes. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(2), 263–288.
Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2018). Interplay between parental argumentative strategies, children’s reactions, and topics of disagreement during mealtime conversations. Culture and Social Interaction, 19, 124–133.
Capaldi, E. D., & Powley, T. L. (1990). Taste, experience, and feeding. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Delamont, S. (1995). Appetites and identities: An introduction to the social anthropology of Western Europe. New York, NY: Routledge.
Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Ochs, E., Pontecorvo, C., & Fasulo, A. (1996). Socializing taste. Ethnos, 61(1), 7–46.
Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children (English translation of La construction de l’intelligence dans l’interaction sociale. Peter Lang, 1979). London: Academic Press.
Pontecorvo, C. (1993). Social interaction in the acquisition of knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 5(3), 293–310.
Sapir, E. (1949). Language. In D. Mandelbaum (Ed.), Selected writing of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality (pp. 7–32). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wiggins, S. (2004). Talking about taste: Using a discursive psychological approach to examine challenges to food evaluations. Appetite, 43(1), 29–38.
Wiggins, S., & Potter, J. (2003). Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs. item and subjective vs. objective constructions in everyday food assessments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(4), 513–531.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bova, A. (2019). Conclusions. In: The Functions of Parent-Child Argumentation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20457-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20457-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20456-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20457-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)