Skip to main content
  • 204 Accesses

Abstract

What is the function of parent–child argumentation? This chapter intends to answer the main research question that has guided the study presented in this volume and open a discussion for future research on this topic. In the first part, the chapter provides a detailed overview of the main findings of the analysis of parent–child argumentative discussions during mealtime. The role played by parents and children in the inception and development of argumentation, and the types of conclusions of their argumentative discussions are described. Subsequently, two educational targets achieved by parents and children through their argumentative interactions are presented and critically discussed. In the last part, new open questions that should guide future investigation to expand our knowledge of the role and function of argumentation between parents and children are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The notion of co-construction referred to in the present study was developed by neo-Piagetian psychologists in the late 1970s and early 1980s (Doise & Mugny, 1984; Perret-Clermont, 1980) to describe processes in which more than one person is involved in the construction of new knowledge.

  2. 2.

    The term “language socialization” stems from Sapir’s classic 1933 article “Language” in the Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, in which he states (quoted in Sapir, 1949, p. 15): “Language is a great force of socialization, probably the greatest that exists.”

References

  • Arcidiacono, F., & Bova, A. (2015). Activity-bound and activity-unbound arguments in response to parental eat-directives at mealtimes: Differences and similarities in children of 3–5 and 6–9 years old. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 6, 40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2013). Investigating children’s Why-questions: A study comparing argumentative and explanatory function. Discourse Studies, 15(6), 713–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2015). Beyond conflicts: Origin and types of issues leading to argumentative discussions during family mealtimes. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(2), 263–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2018). Interplay between parental argumentative strategies, children’s reactions, and topics of disagreement during mealtime conversations. Culture and Social Interaction, 19, 124–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capaldi, E. D., & Powley, T. L. (1990). Taste, experience, and feeding. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delamont, S. (1995). Appetites and identities: An introduction to the social anthropology of Western Europe. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E., Pontecorvo, C., & Fasulo, A. (1996). Socializing taste. Ethnos, 61(1), 7–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children (English translation of La construction de l’intelligence dans l’interaction sociale. Peter Lang, 1979). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontecorvo, C. (1993). Social interaction in the acquisition of knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 5(3), 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E. (1949). Language. In D. Mandelbaum (Ed.), Selected writing of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality (pp. 7–32). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S. (2004). Talking about taste: Using a discursive psychological approach to examine challenges to food evaluations. Appetite, 43(1), 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S., & Potter, J. (2003). Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs. item and subjective vs. objective constructions in everyday food assessments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(4), 513–531.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Bova .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bova, A. (2019). Conclusions. In: The Functions of Parent-Child Argumentation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20457-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics