Abstract
This chapter examines the initial phase of parent–child argumentative discussions during mealtime. The conceptual tool adopted for the analysis is based on the pragma-dialectical ideal model of a critical discussion (van Eemeren & Grootendorst, 2004). The types of issues leading parents and children to engage in argumentative discussions during mealtime as well as the contribution that parents and children provide to the inception of argumentation are described and discussed. The analysis of the initial phase of parent–child argumentative discussions also considers the role played by the specificity of the parent–child relationship and the distinctive features of the activity of family mealtime for the beginning of an argumentative discussion. Exemplary argumentative sequences that bring to light the results obtained through the qualitative analysis of a larger corpus of argumentative discussions between parents and children are presented and discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In Italian, the word “perché” is used both to ask “why” and as a response, like the English word “because.” In attempting to identify all Why-questions asked by children to their parents, I did not consider each instance of “perché” used by children when speaking with their parents but only those with an interrogative function.
- 2.
References
Arcidiacono, F. (2011). “But who said that you eat when you want and what you want?” Verbal conflicts at dinnertime and strategic moves among family members. In J. P. Flanagan & A. M. Munos (Eds.), Family conflicts: Psychological, social and medical implications (pp. 27–52). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Arcidiacono, F., & Bova, A. (2015). Activity-bound and activity-unbound arguments in response to parental eat-directives at mealtimes: Differences and similarities in children of 3–5 and 6–9 years old. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 6, 40–55.
Blum-Kulka, S. (1997). Dinner talk: Cultural patterns of sociability and socialization in family discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bova, A. (2015). Children’s responses in argumentative discussions relating to parental rules and prescriptions. Ampersand, 2, 109–121.
Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2013). Investigating children’s Why-questions: A study comparing argumentative and explanatory function. Discourse Studies, 15(6), 713–734.
Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2014). “You must eat the salad because it is nutritious”. Argumentative strategies adopted by parents and children in food-related discussions at mealtimes. Appetite, 73, 81–94.
Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2015). Beyond conflicts: Origin and types of issues leading to argumentative discussions during family mealtimes. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(2), 263–288.
Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2017). Interpersonal dynamics within argumentative interactions: An introduction. In F. Arcidiacono & A. Bova (Eds.), Interpersonal argumentation in educational and professional contexts (pp. xvii–xxii). New York: Springer.
Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2018). Interplay between parental argumentative strategies, children’s reactions, and topics of disagreement during mealtime conversations. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 19, 124–133.
Capaldi, E. D., & Powley, T. L. (1990). Taste, experience, and feeding. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Chouinard, M. M., Harris, P. L., & Maratsos, M. P. (2007). Children’s questions: A mechanism for cognitive development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 72(1), 1–129.
Craven, A., & Potter, J. (2010). Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 12(4), 419–442.
Delamont, S. (1995). Appetites and identities: An introduction to the social anthropology of Western Europe. New York, NY: Routledge.
Frazier, B. N., Gelamn, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (2009). Preschoolers’ search for explanatory information within adult: Child conversation. Child Development, 80(6), 1592–1611.
Goodwin, C. (2006). Retrospective and prospective orientation in the construction of argumentative moves. Text & Talk, 26(4–5), 443–461.
Gruber, H. (2001). Questions and strategic orientation in verbal conflict sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(12), 1815–1857.
Isaacs, N. (1930). Children’s “why” questions. In S. Isaacs (Ed.), Intellectual growth in young children (pp. 291–349). London: Routledge & Sons.
Kent, A. (2012). Responding to directives: What can children do when a parent tells them what to do? In S. Danby & M. Theobald (Eds.), Disputes in everyday life: Social and moral orders of children and young people. Sociological studies of children and youth, vol. 15 (pp. 57–84). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
Loukusa, S., Ryder, N., & Leinonen, E. (2008). Answering questions and explaining answers: A study of Finnish-speaking children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37(3), 219–241.
Ochs, E., Pontecorvo, C., & Fasulo, A. (1996). Socializing taste. Ethnos, 61(1), 7–46.
Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conceptions of the world. London: Routledge & Kegan.
Pontecorvo, C., Fasulo, A., & Sterponi, L. (2001). Mutual apprentices: The making of parenthood and childhood in family dinner conversations. Human Development, 44(6), 340–361.
Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S. (2009). Argumentation as an object of interest and as a social and cultural resource. In N. Muller-Mirza & A. N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education (pp. 1–61). New York, NY: Springer.
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (1999). Argument or explanation? Propositional relations as clues for distinguishing arguments from explanations. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the IV ISSA Conference (pp. 757–760). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2001). Argumentation, explanation and causality: An exploration of current linguistic approaches to textual relations. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, & W. Spooren (Eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 231–246). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Stern, W. B. (1924). Psychology of early childhood. New York, NY: Henry Holt & Co.
Valian, V., & Casey, L. (2003). Young children’s acquisition of wh-questions: The role of structured input. Journal of Child Language, 30(1), 117–143.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2002). Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in pragma-dialectics (pp. 13–28). Amsterdam and Newport News, VA: Sic Sat and Vale Press.
Walton, D. N. (2004). A new dialectical theory of explanation. Philosophical Exploration, 7(1), 71–89.
Wiggins, S., & Potter, J. (2003). Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs. item and subjective vs. objective constructions in everyday food assessments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(4), 513–531.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bova, A. (2019). The Initial Phase of the Argumentative Discussions Between Parents and Children. In: The Functions of Parent-Child Argumentation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20457-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20457-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20456-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20457-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)