Skip to main content

Behavioral Analysis of Human-Machine Interaction in the Context of Demand Planning Decisions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Systems Engineering (AHFE 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 965))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The trend of digitalization has led to disruptive changes in production and supply chain planning, where autonomous machines and artificial intelligence gain competitive advantages. Besides, the satisfaction of customers’ wishes has reached top priority for demand-driven companies. Consequently, companies implement digital applications, for instance neural networks for accurate demand forecasting and optimized decision-making tools, to cope with nervous operational planning activities. Since planning tasks require human-machine interaction to increase performance and efficiency of planning decisions, this analysis focuses on forms of interaction to determine the right level of collaboration. The paper outlines various levels of interaction and analyses the impact of human reactions in the context of an industrial demand planning algorithm use case at Infineon Technologies AG conducting a behavioral experiment. The results show that a variance in the levels of human-machine interaction has influence on human acceptance of algorithms, but further experiments need to be conducted to outline an overall framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chapman, S., Ettkin, L., Helms, M.: Supply chain forecasting – collaborative forecasting supports supply chain management. Bus. Process Manage. J. 6, 392–407 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goodwin, P., Önkal, D., Thomson, M.: Do forecasts expressed as prediction intervals improve production planning decisions? Eur. J. Oper. Res. 205, 195–201 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Holden, K., Peel, D., Thompson, J.: Economic Forecasting. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Connor, M., Webby, R.: Judgmental and statistical time series forecasting - a review of the literature. Int. J. Forecast. 12, 91–118 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, A., Carbone, R., Fildes, R., Hibon, M., Lewandowski, R., Makridakis, S., Newton, J., Parzen, E., Winkler, R.: The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods - results of a forecasting competition. J. Forecast. 1, 111–153 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clemen, R.: Combining forecasts: a review and annotated bibliography. Int. J. Forecast. 5, 559–583 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Armstrong, J.S., Collopy, F.: Integration of statistical methods and judgment for time series forecasting - principles from empirical research. In: Wright, G., Good-win, P. (eds.) Forecasting with Judgment, pp. 269–293. Wiley, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Armstrong, S., Collopy, F.: Rule-based forecasting: development and validation of an expert systems approach to combining time series extrapolations. Manage. Sci. 38, 1394–1414 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Allen, G., Fildes, R.: Econometric forecasting. In: Armstrong, J.S. (ed.) Principles of Forecasting - A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Springer, Norwell (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Edmundson, R., Lawrence, M., O’Connor, M.: The accuracy of combining judgmental and statistical forecasts. Manage. Sci. 32, 1521–1532 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bunn, D., Wright, G.: Interaction of judgmental and statistical forecasting methods - issues & analysis. Manage. Sci. 37, 501–518 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leitner, J., Leopold-Wildburger, U.: Experiments on forecasting behavior with several sources of information – a review of the literature. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 213, 459–469 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodwin, P., Lawrence, M., O’Connor, M., Önkal, D.: Judgmental forecasting: a review of progress over the last 25 years. Int. J. Forecast. 22, 493–518 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fildes, R., Goodwin, P., Lawrence, M.: The design features of forecasting support systems and their effectiveness. Decis. Support Syst. 42, 351–361 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Edmundson, R., Lawrence, M., O’Connor, M.: The accuracy of combining judgemental and statistical forecasts. Manage. Sci. 32, 1521–1532 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sheridan, T., Verplank, W.: Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators. MIT Man-Machine Systems Laboratory, Cambridge (1978)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T., Wickens, C.: A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. - Part A: Syst. Hum. 30, 286–297 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Johannsen, G.: Human-Machine Interaction. Control Systems, Robotics, and Automation. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). EOLSS Publishers, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng, N., Liu, Z., Ren, P., Ma, Y., Chen, S., Yu, S., Xue, J., Chen, Ba., Wang, F.: Hybrid-augmented intelligence: collaboration and cognition. Front. Inf. Tech. Electron. Eng. 18, 153–179 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson, M., Bradshaw, J.M., Feltovich, P.J.: Tomorrow’s human-machine design tools: from levels of automation to interdependencies. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Making 12, 77–82 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bonaccio, S., Dalal, R.: What types of advice do decision-makers prefer? Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 112, 11–23 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fischer, I., Harvey, N.: Taking advice - accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 70, 117–133 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Judgment under uncertainty - heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1131 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kleinberger, E., Yaniv, H.: Advice taking in decision making - egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 83, 260–281 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fischer, I., Harvey, N.: Taking advice - accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 70, 117–133 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Önkal, D., Goodwin, P., Thomson, M., Gönül, S., Pollock, A.: The relative influence of advice from human experts and statistical methods on forecast adjustments. J. Behav. Decis. Making 22(4), 390–409 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dietvorst, B., Massey, C., Simmons, J.: Algorithm aversion - people erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144, 114–126 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bonaccio, S., Dalal, R.: Advice taking and decision-making - an integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 101, 127–151 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dijkstra, J.: User agreement with incorrect expert system advice. Behav. Inform. Technol. 18, 399–411 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Logg, J.: Theory of machine - when do people reply on algorithms? Hav. Bus. Sch. 17-086, 1–92 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Madhavan, P., Wiegmann, D.: Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems. Hum. Factors 49, 773–785 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kleinberger, E., Yaniv, H.: Advice taking in decision making - egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 83, 260–281 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dietvorst, B., Massey, C., Simmons, J.: Overcoming algorithm aversion - people will use imperfect algorithms if they can (even slightly) modify them. Manage. Sci. 64, 1–17 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Griggs, K., O’Conner, M., Remus, W.: Does feedback improve the accuracy of recurrent judgmental forecasts? Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 66, 22–30 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fildes, R., Goodwin, P.: Judgmental forecasts of time series affected by special events - does providing a statistical forecast improve accuracy? J. Behav. Decis. Making 12, 37–53 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schiller, C., Yachi, G.: Introduction to Demand Planning. Supply Chain Academy, Infineon Technologies AG, Munich (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schiller, C., Yachi, G.: Production Program, Demand Planning, Target Stock Entry in SPLUI. Supply Chain Academy, Infineon Technologies AG, Munich (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Andersen, A., Carbone, R., Corriveau, Y., Corson, P.: Comparing for different time series methods the value of technical expertise individualized analysis, and judgmental adjustment. Manage. Sci. 29, 559–566 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Lauer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lauer, T., Welsch, R., Ramlah Abbas, S., Henke, M. (2020). Behavioral Analysis of Human-Machine Interaction in the Context of Demand Planning Decisions. In: Ahram, T. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Systems Engineering. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 965. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20454-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20454-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20453-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20454-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics