Abstract
This chapter examines professionally situated notions of ‘resource system’ relevant to the work of teaching, giving specific attention to mathematics teaching. Two historically significant exemplars are examined in the form of Euclid’s Elements as a systematic logical organisation of resources and Durell’s A New Geometry as a systematic didactical organisation of resources. Noting a subsequent shift towards the use of multi-sourced collections of resources, the chapter examines how teachers create organised systems, considering the evolving notions of ‘resource system’ in two contemporary theoretical frames: structuring features of classroom practice (Ruthven K, Education & Didactique 3:131–149, 2009) and the documentational approach (Gueudet G, Trouche L, Educational Studies in Mathematics 71:199–218, 2009). Different perspectives situate ‘resource system’ in contrasting ways: as adhering to a particular type of agent (teacher, student, designer) or as intervening between such agents; as relating to a specific educational entity (especially the classroom, the course or the lesson) or as ranging across and beyond these. Professionals and researchers have clearly found each of these variations useful for some purpose: an implication is that we could benefit from an expanded notion of ‘resource system’ which acknowledges all these dimensions and encourages users of the term to take more explicit account of them.
This chapter originates from a lecture given to the Re(s)sources 2018 International Conference. Video in English, with French subtitles at http://video.ens-lyon.fr/ife/2018/2018-05-28_002_Ressources2018_Kenneth_Ruthven_v1.fra.mp4
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Initials of forenames included to distinguish C.V. Durell from his American contemporary author of mathematics textbooks, F. Durell.
- 2.
As, for example, does recent research using the documentational approach to study the use of digital resources by students in higher education (Gueudet & Pepin 2018).
References
Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(3), 205–224.
Barrow-Green, J. (2006). Much necessary for all sortes of men’: 450 years of Euclid’s Elements in English. BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics, 21(1), 2–25.
Beswick, N. (1974). Library resource Centres: A developing literature. Journal of Librarianship, 6(1), 54–62.
Bozkurt, G. (2016). Teaching with technology: A multiple-case study of secondary teachers’ practices of GeoGebra use in mathematics teaching. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
Bozkurt, G., & Ruthven, K. (2017). Teaching with GeoGebra: Resource systems of mathematics teachers. In G. Aldon & J. Trgalová (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching [ICTMT 13] (pp. 216–223). Lyon: École Normale Supérieure de Lyon/Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1.
Brock, W. H. (1975). Geometry and the universities: Euclid and his modem rivals 1860–1901. History of Education, 4(2), 21–35.
Brown, M. (1989). Graded assessment and learning hierarchies in mathematics – An alternative view. British Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 121–128.
Cajori, F. (1910). Attempts made during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to reform the teaching of geometry. American Mathematical Monthly, 17(10), 181–201.
Chemla, K. (Ed.). (2012). The history of mathematical proof in ancient traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Choppin, J., Carson, C., Borys, Z., Cerosaletti, C., & Gillis, R. (2014). A typology for analyzing digital curricula in mathematics education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 2(1), 11–25.
Confrey, J., Gianopulos, G., McGowan, W., Shah, M., & Belcher, M. (2017). Scaffolding learner-centered curricular coherence using learning maps and diagnostic assessments designed around mathematics learning trajectories. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 49(5), 717–734.
de los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Pitt, R., Weller, M., & McAndrew, P. (2016). Adapting the curriculum: How K-12 teachers perceive the role of open educational resources. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(1), 23–40.
Durell, C. V. (1939). A new geometry for schools. London: Bell.
Gibbons, R. (1975). An account of the Secondary Mathematics Individualized Learning Experiment. Mathematics in School, 4(6), 14–16.
Gillespie, R. J., & Humphreys, D. A. (1970). The application of a learning resource system in teaching undergraduate chemistry. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 22(1-2), 111–116.
Graystone, J. A. (1978). The role of the teacher in resource based learning: Towards a conceptual framework. British Educational Research Journal, 4(1), 27–35.
Gueudet, G., & Pepin, B. (2018). Didactic contract at university: A focus on resources and their use. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4(1), 56–73.
Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 199–218.
Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2012). Teachers’ work with resources: Documentational geneses and professional geneses. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to ‘lived’ resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development. New York: Springer.
Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (2013). Collective work with resources: An essential dimension for teacher documentation. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 45(7), 1003–1016.
Gueudet, G., Buteau, C., Mesa, V., & Misfeldt, M. (2014). Instrumental and documentational approaches: From technology use to documentation systems in university mathematics education. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 139–155.
Heath, T. L. (Ed.). (1908). The thirteen books of Euclid’s Elements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Howsam, L., Stray, C., Jenkins, A., Secord, J. A., & Vaninskaya, A. (2007). What the Victorians learned: Perspectives on nineteenth-century schoolbooks. Journal of Victorian Culture, 12(2), 262–285.
Leinhardt, G. (1989). Math lessons: A contrast of novice and expert competence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 52–75.
Means, B. (2007). Technology’s role in curriculum and instruction. In F. M. Connelly (Ed.), The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 123–144). London: Sage.
Pepin, B., Choppin, J., Ruthven, K., & Sinclair, N. (2017). Digital curriculum resources in mathematics education: Foundations for change. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 49(5), 645–661.
Povey, H. (2014). The origins and continued life of SMILE mathematics. Mathematics Teaching, 241, 5–6.
Quadling, D. (1996). A century of textbooks. Mathematical Gazette, 80(487), 119–126.
Recker, M. M., Dorward, J., & Nelson, L. M. (2004). Discovery and use of online learning resources: Case study findings. Educational Technology & Society, 7(2), 93–104.
Rouse Ball, W. W. (1908). A short account of the history of mathematics (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
Ruthven, K. (2009). Towards a naturalistic conceptualisation of technology integration in classroom practice: The example of school mathematics. Education & Didactique, 3(1), 131–149.
Ruthven, K. (2018). Instructional activity and student interaction with digital resources. In L. Fan, L. Trouche, C. Qi, S. Rezat, & J. Visnovska (Eds.), Research on mathematics textbooks and teachers’ resources: Advances and issues. ICME 13 monograph (pp. 261–275). Cham: Springer.
Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2008). Constructions of dynamic geometry: A study of the interpretative flexibility of educational software in classroom practice. Computers & Education, 51(1), 297–317.
Zhao, Z., Cook, J., & Higgen, N. (1996). Online learning for design students. ALT-J, 4(1), 69–76.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ruthven, K. (2019). The Construct of ‘Resource System’ as an Analytic Tool in Understanding the Work of Teaching. In: Trouche, L., Gueudet, G., Pepin, B. (eds) The ‘Resource’ Approach to Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20393-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20393-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20392-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20393-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)