Abstract
Although only a new generation of scholars can get the current system to decline and fade, there are at least three factors showing that the twilight is not that far away: jobs, technology, and stupidity. The exclusive job-oriented approach of “modern” universities is the basis of the pact between customers and suppliers, but this Faustian bargain will no longer survive if new jobs cannot be predicted and the training requirements anticipated; thus, the transmission of notions, methods, and protocols becomes irrelevant. Information and communications technology (ICT) is the second lethal weapon against the “modern” university model because it will jeopardize the system. The third issue deals with human nature: the stupidity of all bureaucratic universities. The corporate attitude has infiltrated every choice and discussion in the everyday life of universities. The management practices produce multifaceted levels of bureaucracy that simply tend to be worse than the sum of its parts. The cybernation of interpersonal relationships, the dematerialization translating every rule into an ITC procedure, and the primacy of representation over any other value can escape from the control of the supreme controllers, as in a science fiction novel where an automaton becomes an individual and the individual is no longer distinguishable from an avatar.
It is the education which gives a man a clear, conscious view of their own opinions and judgements, a truth in developing them, an eloquence in expressing them, and a force in urging them.
John Henry Newman
Cardinal Deacon of San Giorgio in Velabro
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Cockburn, A. (2012) The Myth of the “Knowledge Economy”, “Counterpunch”, March 23, 2012, https://www.counterpunch.org (January 20, 2017)
- 2.
Freeman, R. (1976) The Overeducated American. New York: Academic Press
- 3.
Maiolo, M.E., Cortini M. & R.G. Zuffo (2013) Education or employment? The challenging choice of today’s youth, “Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences”, 84, 298-302
- 4.
Jenssen, S. & U. Backes-Gellner (2009) Skill Obsolescence, Vintage Effects and Changing Tasks, “Applied Economics Quarterly”, 55: 83-103
- 5.
Reynold Lewis, K. (2011) Unpaid jobs: The new normal? “Fortune”, March 25
- 6.
Oliver, D., Stewart, A., Hewitt, A. & P. McDonald (2017) The young are paying for the privilege of unpaid work – and it’s further entrenching inequality. “The Guardian”, January 18 (March 12, 2018)
- 7.
Zaru, E., a cura di (2016) Empire, quindici anni dopo. Intervista ad Antonio Negri, www.filosofia-italiana.net, Aprile 2016
- 8.
- 9.
https://studentloanhero.com/student-loan-debt-statistics/ (May 23, 2019)
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
Not (engaged) in education, employment, or training, people aged between 16 and 24 (in Japan, between 15 and 34) who are not employed, not engaged in housework, not enrolled in school or work-related training, and not seeking work
- 13.
McKinsey Global Institute (2018) Skill shift. Automation and the future of the workforce. McKinsey & Company, May, www.mckinsey.com/mgi
- 14.
Technavio, Global Corporate E-learning Market 2016–2020, January 2016
- 15.
Sawers, P. Coursera for Business launches to tap the billion-dollar corporate e-learning market, venturebeat.com (August 31, 2016).
- 16.
Stix, J., et al. (2018) A new massive open online course on natural disasters, Eos, 99
- 17.
- 18.
It is a pricing strategy by which a product or service is provided free of charge, but money (premium) is charged for additional features, services, or virtual goods.
- 19.
Entities must not to be multiplied beyond necessity.
- 20.
Pacchiano, G. (2017) Anglicismi al Miur: parla come mangi. “Il Fatto Quotidiano”, June 9
- 21.
Bothwell, E. (2016) Nordic higher education in decline? “Times Higher Education”, September 15
- 22.
Mitchell, N. (2013) Is Sweden recovering from the international student crash? “University World News”, September 14
- 23.
Reisz, M. (2017) France’s academy: liberty, autonomy or permanent bureaucracy? “Times Higher Education”, April 20
- 24.
Kuhl, S. (2014) The Sudoku Effect: Universities in the Vicious Circle of Bureaucracy. Berlin: Springer
- 25.
Peter, L.J. & R. Hull (1969) The Peter Principle: Why Things Always Go Wrong. New York: William Morrow and Company
- 26.
http://www.laopinion.es/opinion/2010/11/07/umbral-incompetencia/312847.html (February 5, 2018)
- 27.
Deleuze, G. (1968) Différence et repetition, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France
- 28.
Cipolla, C.M. (1976) The basic laws of human stupidity, Bologna: Il Mulino (reprint 2011)
- 29.
Alvesson, M. & A. Spicer (2015) The Stupidity Paradox. The Power and Pitfalls of Functional Stupidity at Work, London: Profile Book
- 30.
Debord, G. (1967) La Société du spectacle, Paris: Éditions Buchet-Chastel
- 31.
Pinto, V. (2013) La valutazione come strumento di intelligence e tecnologia di governo, “Aut Aut” n. 360
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosso, R. (2019). The Fall of the Utilitarian Model. In: The Decline and Renaissance of Universities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20385-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20385-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20384-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20385-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)