Abstract
The National Institute for Economic and Social Research (NIESR) is one of the oldest and most reputed policy research organisations in the UK, with roots in post-war economic decision-making and strong links with academics and economists at the Bank of England. As an organisation that produces econometric forecasts and research funded by government departments, it faced two main challenges after 2008; first, a growing mistrust of their work—even if demand for it grew—as they were seen to have failed to foresee the crisis; second, a tighter budget following cuts to public spending on research. As a result, NIESR hired a new director in 2011 who successfully raised the public profile of the organisation while expanding the types of funding it pursued. However, NIESR also faced ever more frequent challenges from defenders of the government’s austerity programme. Critics argued NIESR had become politicised, even if its researchers claimed to merely be bringing attention to the economic evidence in a public debate in which the latter was mostly absent.
Throughout this chapter, references in the format (MM/YYYY) include those of this think tank’s own academic journal, the National Institute Economic Review .
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Although NIESR went through a hiatus during WWII, due to the concentration of economists in the war effort, it became stronger after the war (Jones, op. cit.; Robinson 05/1988).
- 2.
These include the Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung in Germany and the Swedish Konjunkturinstitutet, founded in 1925 and 1937, respectively.
- 3.
Christopher Dow was also former Assistant Secretary General of the OECD and Fellow of the British Academy (Independent 1998).
- 4.
Bryan Hopkin was chair at the University of Cardiff and, among many other public service positions, head of the Government Economic Service and Chief Economic Advisor to the Treasury during Healey’s premiership (see Daily Telegraph 2009).
- 5.
Before joining NIESR, Christopher Saunders was Deputy Director of the Central Statistical Office, and later became Director of Research for the UN Economic Commission for Europe (Frowen 1983).
- 6.
Possibly NIESR’s first mainly academic director, David Worswick was based at the University of Oxford Institute of Statistics.
- 7.
See, for comparison, ASI top-ten positions in the same categories (Chapter 4).
- 8.
Accessed 10 October 2015, https://web.archive.org/web/20101219124903/http://www.niesr.ac.uk/aboutniesr2.0.php.
- 9.
By way of contrast, the Policy Studies Institute—formerly Political and Economic Planning—a historically comparable think tank that also has a strong academic profile, depends nowadays on the University of Westminster.
- 10.
Lord Burns GCB is a life peer, former Treasury Chief Economic Advisor and former Chairman of Abbey plc (Santander bank subsidiary).
- 11.
Tim Besley CBE is Professor of Economics at the LSE, former member of the BoE MPC , and former president of the International Economic Association.
- 12.
Diane Coyle OBE is a Professor at the University of Manchester, former advisor to the Treasury, and former Vice-chairman of the BBC, and current NIESR Council Chair.
- 13.
Heather Joshi CBE is Emeritus Professor of Economic and Developmental Demography at the University of London. She is also the former Director of the Centre for Longitudinal Studies and of the UK Millennium Cohort Study.
- 14.
John Hills is Head of Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE), LSE.
- 15.
Bronwyn Curtis OBE is former HSBC Head of Global Research and current Non-Executive Director of JP Morgan Asian Investment Trust.
- 16.
Peter Kellner is a political commentator and Head of the polling company YouGov.
- 17.
John Llewelyn is Founding Partner at Llewellyn Consulting, former Managing Director at Lehman Brothers and adviser to HM Treasury.
- 18.
This type of organisation finds parallels in the United States in the faith in positivist social sciences implicit in early twentieth century institutions such as the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) and the aforementioned NBER (Medvetz 2012a).
- 19.
See NEF’s (Reid 04/2013) and ASI’s (Oliver 01/2012) in their respective chapters (III and IV).
- 20.
“The Science Arbiter seeks to stay removed from explicit considerations of policy and politics […] but recognizes that decision-makers may have specific questions that require the judgment of experts, so unlike the Pure Scientist the Science Arbiter has direct interactions with decision-makers. […] A key characteristic of the Science Arbiter is a focus on positive questions that can in principle be resolved through scientific inquiry. In principle, the Science Arbiter avoids normative questions and thus seeks to remain above the political fray” (Pielke 2007: 16).
- 21.
“Our independence is everything, our reputation for independence. So that’s something that does worry us […] if they begin to try and attack that. […] We are deliberately not aligned with any political party or any political stance. We value […] independence in our thought and […] if you’ve got core funding it’s probably increasingly more difficult to have it. But it makes fundraising easier if you have that […] income on a regular basis” (NIESR interview).
- 22.
“[I]ntervention cannot be efficacious without being equipped with all that makes expertise strong, and that opinion by itself lacks, namely, techniques, instruments, demonstrations, figures, charts, numbers” (Eyal and Levy, op. cit.: 228).
- 23.
“Once [our data] moves into the public domain then you have no control over how your message evolves. So it is very common for us to put pieces out and people to take not quite the extreme, but at times almost […] diametrically opposed views on the basis of the same piece of work. But that happens with statistics. Statistics come out from the ONS and all sorts of different messages are spun from exactly the same number. We try and be very clear in what we’re doing and how we’re interpreting our work, but […] if someone wants to use it in a certain way they will. You can put a formal piece out saying we would like to clarify that’s not what it says or ‘would you correct that,’ but once it’s out there, it’s out there” (NIESR interview).
- 24.
“From the perspective of those that work on macroeconomics at the Institute […] particularly around NiGEM […] the crisis really did change what we were working on […] Running up to the crisis we were about to undertake a major piece of work just looking at macro-level consumption functions across Europe. We’d done all the data work […] just to get things into the situation we wanted them to be. That was scrapped entirely because we weren’t going to get […] funding for it [….] so the cost of all the data work was gone. We’ve never gone back to it” (NIESR interview).
- 25.
“[After the crisis] we re-focused entirely. We started having calls from various institutions […] The Financial Services Authority as they then existed […] came to us and [said] ‘we provide you with funding, can you try and prepare a banking sector model for the UK into NIGEM that we can use?’ […] they wanted to […] gauge what impact regulatory changes to banking sector would have on the real economy” (NIESR interview).
- 26.
A risk premium is the “additional expected return that an investor requires over the return on a risk-free asset” (NIESR 11/2009: 19).
- 27.
The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) was established in May 2010 as an advisory public body tasked with producing independent assessments of the state of British public finances.
- 28.
Accessed 17 October 2015, http://www.niesr.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publications/131011_171942.pdf.
- 29.
“We re-vamped the website completely, introduced a blog post, went into social media, trained all our staff in social media and Twitter and we’ve aimed to have much more of an impact, and we have had an impact. So our profile has really risen in the last few years” (NIESR interview).
- 30.
“We […] became a bit too pessimistic in the second half of 2012 into 2013 because of real world events. In particular, our 2013 forecasts were low because of data […] that were subsequently revised up quite significantly. So that led us down that path […] I find that quite interesting because people say you were just continuously pessimistic and gloomy and it’s like well, if you look at our 2012 forecasts, we weren’t that far off where the economy got to” (NIESR interview).
- 31.
“So this year and last year [2014-2015] we’ve just tried to publish a very short piece that just gives our forecast errors […] We performed better than some recent benchmark forecasts, started comparing ourselves to a few other institutions […]. So we’ve not done [forecast error analyses] at the level of detail the OBR, the IMF, or the OECD have, which is fine because they’ve got the resources to do it […] It is a resource question. It would be nice for us to do that, but no one is going to provide the funding for us to […]. We may be able to carve out the time gradually over the years to look at that, but that’s a luxury that I’m envious of” (NIESR interview).
- 32.
See (accessed 13 October 2015) http://www.pcc.org.uk/advanced_search.html?keywords=jonathan+portes&page=1&num=10&publication=x&decision=x&image.x=0&image.y=0.
- 33.
Accessed 1 November 2015, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBC0mLFz91o.
- 34.
“[On government department research] the competition has increased because there’s a lot of different organisations now bidding for that kind of work, which there weren’t in the past” (NIESR interview).
- 35.
Denham and Garnett argue a rift between NIESR and government had already happened in the Thatcher years: “[a] new low point […] was reached in the early 1980s, when […] NIESR, which generally favoured growth, confronted a government which had committed itself to a policy which deepened an already serious recession” (Denham and Garnett 1998: 78).
References
Alesina, A., & Ardagna, S. (2009). Large changes in fiscal policy: Taxes versus spending (NBER Working Papers, 15438). Accessed 10 April 2015. http://www.nber.org/papers/w15438.pdf.
Alonso, W., & Starr, P. (Eds.). (1987). The politics of numbers. New York: Sage.
Barrell, R., Davis, P., Karim, D., & Liadze, I. (2010). Bank regulation, property prices and early warning systems for banking crises in OECD countries. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34, 2255–2264.
Barrell, R., Hurst, I., & Kirby, S. (2009). The macroeconomic implications of pension reform. In D. France (Ed.), Pension reform, fiscal policy and economic performance. Rome: Bank of Italy.
BBC. (2007). Northern Rock: Expert views. Accessed 20 March 2015. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6999246.stm.
BBC. (2009a). UK recession ‘worst since 1930s’. Accessed 28 October 2015. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8034879.stm.
BBC. (2009b). UK recovery ‘to take five years’. Accessed 28 October 2015. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8162217.stm.
Bockman, J., & Eyal, G. (2002). Eastern Europe as a laboratory for economic knowledge: The transnational roots of neoliberalism. American Journal of Sociology, 108(2), 310–352.
Boswell, C. (2009). The political uses of expert knowledge: Immigration policy and social research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Budd, A. (1999). Learning from the wise people. The Manchester School Supplement, 1463–6786, 36–48.
Callon, M. (2007). What does it means to say that economics is performative? In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics (pp. 311–356). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Coats, A. W. (Ed.). (2000). The development of economics in Western Europe since 1945. London: Routledge.
ConservativeHome. (2013). Andrew Lilico: What Jonathan Portes gets wrong and why. Accessed 15 October 2015. http://www.conservativehome.com/platform/2013/01/andrew-lilico-what-jonathan-portes-gets-wrong-and-why.html.
Daily Telegraph. (2009). Sir Bryan Hopkin. Accessed 20 March 2016. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/politics-obituaries/6638037/Sir-Bryan-Hopkin.html.
Denham, A., & Garnett, M. (1998). British think tanks and the climate of opinion. London: UCL Press.
Denham, A., & Garnett, M. (2004). A ‘hollowed out’ tradition? British think tanks in the twenty-first century. In A. Denham & D. Stone (Eds.), Think tank traditions (pp. 232–246). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Evans, R. (1999). Macroeconomic forecasting: A sociological appraisal. London: Routledge.
Eyal, G., & Levy, M. (2013). Economic indicators as public interventions. In T. Mata & S. Medema (Eds.), The economist as public intellectual (pp. 220–253). London: Duke University Press.
Financial Times. (2009). Think tank says cuts will not pay debt. Accessed 15 October 2015. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/39c54894-7655-11de-9e59-00144feabdc0.html.
Financial Times. (2010a). UK out of recession, says think tank. Accessed 23 June 2015. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/271f57e6-0054-11df-8626-00144feabdc0.html.
Financial Times. (2010b). Labour ‘errors’ attacked by former official. Accessed 15 October 2015. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d86bed74-4f38-11df-b8f4-00144feab49a.html.
Financial Times. (2010c). Spending cuts spark fears for growth. Accessed 15 October 2015. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d7abbb20-7d65-11df-a0f5-00144feabdc0.html.
Financial Times. (2010d). UK growing near long-term trend, says NIESR. Accessed 30 June 2015. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/073c19f8-7590-11df-86c4-00144feabdc0.html.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power, knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. New York: The Harvester Press.
Frowen, S. (Ed.). (1983). Controlling industrial economies: Essays in honour of Christopher Thomas Saunders. London: Macmillan.
Guardian. (2008). No recession, economists say—Provided there are no more Rocks. Accessed 20 October 2015. http://www.theguardian.com/business/2008/may/02/creditcrunch.banking.
Guardian. (2009). Revealed: £3bn mistake in George Osborne’s budget plan. Accessed 21 October 2015. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/oct/09/george-osborne-budget-deficit.
Guardian. (2013). Romanian and Bulgarian migrants ‘unlikely to head for UK’—Report. Accessed 25 October 2015. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/apr/05/eastern-european-migrants-report.
Hierländer, R., Huber, P., Iara, A., Landesmann, M., Nowotny, K., O’Mahony, M., et al. (2010). Migration, skills and productivity (WIIW Research Reports, 365). Accessed 20 June 2015. http://wiiw.ac.at/migration-skills-and-productivity-dlp-2270.pdf.
Independent. (1998). Obituary: Christopher Dow. Accessed 20 March 2016. http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/obituary-christopher-dow-1189026.html.
Ladi, S. (2011). Think tanks, discursive institutionalism and policy change. In G. Papanagnou (Ed.), Social science and policy challenges: Democracy, values and capacities. Paris: UNESCO.
London Review of Books. (2013). Jonathan Portes: An exercise in scapegoating. Accessed 10 October 2015. http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n12/jonathan-portes/an-exercise-in-scapegoating.
Markoff, J., & Montecinos, V. (1993). The ubiquitous rise of economists. Journal of Public Policy, 13(1), 37–68.
McGann, J. (2013). 2012 global go to think tanks and policy advice ranking. Think Tanks and Civil Society Program, University of Pennsylvania.
Medium. (2015). Ed Conway: Why Jonathan Portes left NIESR. Accessed 30 October 2015. https://medium.com/@edconwaysky/why-jonathan-portes-left-niesr-3999329290d9#.t9pn5q6ka.
Medvetz, T. (2012a). Think tanks in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Medvetz, T. (2012b). Murky power: ‘Think tanks’ as boundary organizations. In D. Golsorkhi, D. Courpasson, & J. Sallaz (Eds.), Rethinking power in organizations, institutions, and markets: Research in the sociology of organizations (pp. 113–133). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
Mirowski, P. (2002). Machine dreams: Economics becomes a cyborg science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norman, J. (2012). Fisking Portes: How politically neutral *is* the Director of NIESR? Accessed 23 October 2015. http://www.jessenorman.com/2012/11/fisking-portes-how-politically-neutral-is-the-director-of-niesr.html.
Norpoth, H. (1991). The popularity of the Thatcher government: A matter of war and economy. In H. Norpoth, M. Lewis-Beck, & J. Lafay (Eds.), Economics and politics: The calculus of support. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Pain, N., & Young, G. (2004). The macroeconomic impact of UK withdrawal from the EU. Economic Modelling, 21, 387–408.
ParliamentLive. (2012). Treasury Committee: Tuesday 13 November 2012. Accessed 10 October 2015. http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/a31b4072-101e-4a65-8a90-f14cba88937d.
Pielke, R. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pieria. (2013). Jonathan Portes: NIESR and the European Commission: A response to Dan Hannan. Accessed 12 October 2015. http://www.pieria.co.uk/articles/niesr_and_the_european_commission_a_response_to_dan_hannan.
Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Prospect. (2013). The Prospect duel: Was Osborne right? Accessed 10 October 2015. http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/regulars/the-prospect-duel-mark-littlewood-jonathan-portes-was-osborne-right.
Reichmann, W. (2011). Institutionalizing scientific knowledge: The social and political foundation of empirical economic research. Sociology Compass, 5(7), 564–575.
Schmidt, V. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Political Science, 11(1), 303–322.
The Spectator. (2015a). Niall Ferguson: Jonathan Portes, master of the political correction. Accessed 10 October 2015. http://www.spectator.co.uk/2015/06/jonathan-portes-master-of-correct-politicalness/.
The Spectator. (2015b). Jonathan Portes fired as NIESR director. Accessed 30 October 2015 http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2015/10/jonathan-portes-stands-down-from-niesr-by-mutual-consent/.
The Times. (2004). Brown attacked for fiscal ‘fudge.’ Accessed 24 October 2015. http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/business/entrepreneur/article2229114.ece.
Weale, M. (2010). Unsustainable consumption: The structural flaw behind the UK’s long boom. In G. Giudice, R. Kuenzel, & T. Springbett (Eds.), UK economy: The crisis in perspective (pp. 59–79). London: Routledge.
Weingart, P. (1999). Scientific expertise and political accountability: Paradoxes of science in politics. Science and Public Policy, 26(3), 151–161.
Think Tank Reports and Blog Posts [NIESR, available at niesr.ac.uk]
Armstrong, A. (10/2011). An assessment of the Independent Commission on Banking’s recommendations. National Institute Economic Review, 218(3), f4–f12.
Babecký, J., Bulíř, A., & Šmídková, K. (04/2008). Sustainable real exchange rates when trade winds are plentiful. National Institute Economic Review, 204, 98–107.
Bagaria, N., Holland, D., & Van Reenen, J. (07/2012). Fiscal consolidation during a depression. National Institute Economic Review, 221, f42–f54.
Barrell, R. (10/2008). Press release: The great crash of 2008.
Barrell, R. (10/2009a). Budget consolidation options for the UK. National Institute Economic Review, 210, 58–60.
Barrell, R. (10/2009b). Long-term scarring from the financial crisis. National Institute Economic Review, 210, 36–38.
Barrell, R., & Davis, P. (04/2011). Financial regulation. National Institute Economic Review, 216, F4–F9.
Barrell, R., Foley-Fischer & Kirby, S. (10/2009). Prospects for the UK economy. National Institute Economic Review, 210, 39–57.
Barrell, R., & Hurst, I. (04/2008). Financial crises and the prospects for recession. National Institute Economic Review, 204, 33–38.
Barrell, R., & Kirby, S. (04/2007). Managing a decline in inflation. National Institute Economic Review, 200, 53–55.
Barrell, R., Kirby, S., Metz, R., & Weale, M. (04/2005). The Labour government’s economic record and economic prospects. National Institute Economic Review, 192, 4–10.
Barrell, R., & Weale, M. (03/2009). The economics of a reduction in VAT (NIESR Discussion Paper, 325).
Budd, A. (04/2010) Fiscal policy under Labour. National Institute Economic Review, 212, R34-R48.
Dorsett, R., Lui, S., & Weale, M. (08/2010). Economic benefits of lifelong learning.
Goodridge, P., Haskel, J., & Wallis, G. (05/2013). Can intangible investment explain the UK productivity puzzle? National Institute Economic Review, 224, f48–f58.
Holland, D., & Portes, J. (10/2012). Self-defeating austerity? National Institute Economic Review, 222, f4–f10.
Kirby, S., Paluchowski, P., & Warren, J. (05/2014). The performance of NIESR’s GDP forecasts. National Institute Economic Review, 228, 66–70.
Kirby, S., & Riley, R. (01/2007). UK economy forecast. National Institute Economic Review, 199, 40–58.
Jones, K. (05/1988). Fifty years of economic research: A brief history of the National Institute for Economic and Social Research. National Institute Economic Review, 124, 36–62.
Jones, K. (04/1998). Sixty years of economic research: A brief history of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research. London: NIESR Occasional Papers.
Metcalf, H., & Rolfe, H. (12/2010). Caste discrimination and harassment in Great Britain.
NIESR. (08/2007). 2007 annual report.
NIESR. (01/2008). The world economy: Risks of a global recession. National Institute Economic Review, 203, 8–30.
NIESR. (07/2008). The UK economy. National Institute Economic Review, 205, 3.
NIESR. (08/2008). 2008 annual report.
NIESR. (01/2009). Estimates of monthly GDP.
NIESR. (04/2009). The UK economy. National Institute Economic Review, 208, p. 3.
NIESR. (08/2009). 2009 annual review.
NIESR. (11/2009). The channels of financial market contagion in the new EU member states.
NIESR. (03/2011). 2011 annual accounts.
NIESR. (01/2012). The UK economy. National Institute Economic Review, 219, f3.
NIESR. (03/2012). 2012 annual accounts.
NIESR. (07/2012). The UK economy. National Institute Economic Review, 221, f3.
NIESR. (02/2013). The UK economy. National Institute Economic Review, 223, f3.
NIESR. (08/2013). The UK economy. National Institute Economic Review, 225, f3.
NIESR. (05/2014). Prospects for the UK economy.
Portes, J. (01/2012a). British jobs and foreign workers: Today’s reports on immigration and unemployment.
Portes, J. (01/2012b). Fiscal policy: What does “Keynesian” mean?
Portes, J. (03/2012). It’s not too late to change course: Macbeth and fiscal policy.
Portes, J. (04/2012). The European Commission is doing its best to drive Spain to disaster.
Portes, J. (06/2012a). DWP analysis shows mandatory work activity is largely ineffective. Government is therefore extending it.
Portes, J. (06/2012b). Macroeconomics: What is it good for? [a response to Diane Coyle].
Portes, J. (10/2012). More on multipliers: Why does it matter?
Portes, J. (11/2012). Faith-based economics at the Treasury Committee.
Portes, J. (01/2013). Debating debt ratios with Michael Fabricant.
Portes, J. (03/2013). Budget 2013: Time for an investment-led growth agenda.
Portes, J. (10/2013). Fiscal consolidation and growth: What’s going on?
Portes, J. (11/2013). Commentary: The economic implications for the UK of leaving the European Union. National Institute Economic Review, 226, 4–9.
Riley, R., & Young, G. (05/2014). Financial crisis and economic performance: Introduction. National Institute Economic Review, 228, r1–r2.
Robinson, A. (05/1988). The National Institute: The early years. National Institute Economic Review, 124, 63–66.
Rolfe, H., Fic, T., Lalani, M., Roman, M., Prohaska, M., & Doudeva, L. (04/2013). Potential impacts on the UK of future migration from Bulgaria and Romania.
Weale, M. (10/2007). Northern Rock: Solutions and problems. National Institute Economic Review, 202, 4–8.
Weale, M. (04/2008). Commentary: The banking crisis and the economy. National Institute Economic Review, 204, 4–8.
Weale, M. (10/2008). Commentary: The burden of the national debt. National Institute Economic Review, 2010, 4–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
González Hernando, M. (2019). The National Institute of Economic and Social Research: The Shifting Fortunes of Expert Arbiters. In: British Think Tanks After the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. Palgrave Studies in Science, Knowledge and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20370-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20370-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20369-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20370-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)