Abstract
Bystanders are individuals who witness a bullying episode but are not directly involved as a bully or victim. Bystanders engage in three basic behaviors: (1) negative bystanders—They support the bully either with verbal encouragement or by actually engaging in the bullying; (2) passive bystanders—They do nothing and simply observe the bullying or wait until the bullying has ended and then comfort the victim; or (3) prosocial bystanders—They support the victim by confronting the bully, getting a teacher, or removing the victim from the situation. Recently, the term “upstander” has been used to describe prosocial bystanders. The current chapter provides an overview of prevalence rates of bystander presence and various bystander behavior. A discussion is provided of motivating factors behind bystander responses to bullying including individual psychology, sociometric status/popularity, and situational factors. The impact of witnessing bullying on bystanders is also discussed as well as an overview of how to increase prosocial bystander behavior.
The world is dangerous not because of those who do harm, but because of those who look at it without doing anything.
Nothing that I can do will change the structure of the universe. But maybe by raising my voice I can help the greatest of all causes—goodwill among men and peace on earth.
—Albert Einstein
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aluede, O., Adeleke, F., Omoike, D., & Afen-Akpaida, J. (2008). A review of the extent, nature, characteristics, and effects of bullying behaviour in schools. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35, 151–158.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Arbib, M. (2006). The mirror system hypothesis on the linkage of action and languages. In M. Arbib (Ed.), Action to language via the mirror neuron system (pp. 3–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Asher, S. R., Parker, J. G., & Walker, D. L. (1996). Distinguishing friendship from acceptance: Implications for intervention and assessment. In W. M. Burkowksi, A. F. Newcomb, & W. W. Hartfup (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship during childhood and adolescence (pp. 366–405). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Atlas, R. S., & Pepler, D. J. (1998). Observations of bullying in the classroom. Journal of Educational Research, 92(2), 86–99.
Bagwell, C. L., & Schmidt, M. E. (2011). Friendships in childhood and adolescence. New York, NY: Guilford.
Barhight, L. R., Hubbard, J. A., & Hyde, C. T. (2013). Children’s physiological and emotional reactions to witnessing bullying predict bystander intervention. Child Development, 84(1), 375–390.
Bell-Dolan, D. J., Foster, S. L., & Sikora, D. M. (1989). Effects of sociometric testing on children’s behavior at school. Developmental Psychology, 25, 306–311.
Bierman, K. L. (2004). Peer rejection: Developmental processes and intervention strategies. New York, NY: Guilford.
Bystander Revolution. (2016). Bystander Revolution: Take the power out of bullying. San Francisco, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.bystanderrevolution.org/
Caravita, S. C. S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18(1), 140–163.
Chen, L., Chang, Y. C. L., & Cheng, Y. (2016). Choosing to be a defender or an outsider in a school bullying incident: Determining factors and the defending process. School Psychology International, 37(3), 289–302.
Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., McClaskey, C. L., & Brown, M. M. (1986). Social competence in children. Monographs of the Society for Prevention Research in Child Development, 51(2), 1–85.
Facing History and Ourselves. (2017). What difference can a word make?: Holocaust and Human Behavior. Brookline, MA: Author. Retrieved from https://www.facinghistory.org/holocaust-and-human-behavior/chapter-12/what-difference-can-word-make
Fontaine, R. G., Yang, C., Burks, V. S., Dodge, K. A., Price, J. M., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (1999). Loneliness as a partial mediator of the relation between low social preference in childhood and anxious/depressed symptoms in adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 479–491.
Frey, K. S., Hirschstein, M. K., Snell, J. L., Edstrom, L. V. S., MacKenzie, E. P., & Broderick, C. J. (2005). Reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs: An experimental trial of steps to respect program. Developmental Psychology, 41(3), 479–491.
Frey, K. S., Hirshstein, M. K., Edstrom, L. V., & Snell, J. L. (2009). Observed reductions in school bullying, nonbullying aggression, and destructive bystander behavior: A Longitudinal evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 466–481.
Gini, G. (2008). Associations between bullying behavior, psychosomatic complaints, emotional and behavioral problems. Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health, 44(9), 492–497.
Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoe, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents’ bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33, 467–476.
Hawkins, D. L., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10(4), 512–527.
Hutchinson, M. (2012). Exploring the impact of bullying on young bystanders. Educational Psychology in Practice: Theory, Research, and Practice in Educational Psychology, 18(4), 425–442.
Janson, G. R., & Hazler, R. J. (2004). Trauma reactions of bystanders and victims to repetitive abuse experiences. Violence and Victims, 19(2), 239–255.
Jones, L. M., Mitchell, K. J., & Turner, H. A. (2015). Victim reports of bystander reactions to in-person and online peer harassment: A national survey of adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 2308–2320.
Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpela, M., Marttunen, M., Rimplea, A., & Rantanen, P. (1999). Bullying, depression, and suicidal ideation in Finnish adolescents: School survey. British Journal of Medicine, 319, 348–351.
Karna, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Alanen, E., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Effectiveness of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 1-3 and 7-9. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 535–551.
Karna, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Alenan, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2011a). Going to scale: A nonrandomized nationwide trial of KiVa antibullying program for grades 1-9. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 79(6), 796–805.
Karna, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011b). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 4-6. Child Development, 82(1), 311–330.
Karna, A., Voeten, M., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Vulnerable children in varying classroom contexts: Bystanders’ behaviors moderate the effects of risk factors on victimization. Merill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(3), 261–282.
Keysers, C., & Gazzola, V. (2006). Towards a unifying neural theory of social cognition. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 379–401.
Molenberghs, P., Cunnington, R., & Mattingley, J. B. (2009). Is the mirror neuron system involved in imitation? A short review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(7), 975–980.
Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(16), 2094–2110.
O’Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437–452.
Obermann, M. (2011). Moral disengagement among bystanders to school bullying. Journal of School Violence, 10, 239–257.
Oh, I., & Hazler, R. J. (2009). Contributions of personal and situational factors to bystanders’ reactions to school bullying. School Psychology International, 30, 291–310.
Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 611–621.
Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125–144.
Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41(1), 47–65.
Rivers, I., & Noret, N. (2010). Participant roles in bullying behavior and their association with thoughts on ending one’s life. Crisis, 31, 143–148.
Rivers, I., Poteat, V. P., Noret, N., & Ashurst, N. (2009). Observing bullying at school: The mental health implications of witness status. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(4), 211–223.
Sainio, M., Veenstra, R., Huitsing, G., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). Same- and other-sex victimization: Are the risk factors similar? Aggressive Behavior, 38, 442–455.
Salmivalli, C., Karna, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Counteracting bullying in Finland: The KiVa program and its effects on different forms of being bullied. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(5), 405–411.
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.
Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between Reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40(5), 668–676.
Sokol, N., Bussey, K., & Rapee, R. (2015). The effect of victims’ responses to overt bullying on same-sex peer bystander reactions. Journal of School Psychology, 53, 375–391.
Song, J., & Oh, I. (2017). Investigation of the bystander effect in school bullying: Comparison of experiential, psychological, and situational factors. School Psychology International, 38(3), 319–336.
Tapper, K., & Boulton, M. J. (2005). Victim and peer group responses to different forms of aggression among primary school children. Aggressive Behavior, 31, 238–253.
Trach, J., Hymel, S., Waterhouse, T., & Neale, K. (2010). Bystander responses to school bullying: A cross-sectional investigation of grade and sex differences. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25, 114–130.
Waddell, W. J. (2010). History of dose response. The Journal of Toxicological Sciences, 35(1), 1–8.
Wang, J., Iannotti, R. J., & Nansel, T. R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(4), 368–375.
Weiss, D. S. (2004). The impact of event scale-Revised. In J. P. Wilson & T. M. Keane (Eds.), Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD (pp. 168–190). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Williford, A., Boulton, A., Noland, B., Little, T. D., Karna, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). Effects of the KiVa anti-bullying program on adolescents’ depression, anxiety, and perception of peers. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 289–300.
Zimmer, B. (September 9, 2016). How high-school girls won a campaign for ‘Upstander’. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-high-school-girls-won-a-campaign-for-upstander-1473436114
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smokowski, P.R., Evans, C.B.R. (2019). To Intervene or Not Intervene? That Is the Question: Bystanders in the Bullying Dynamic. In: Bullying and Victimization Across the Lifespan. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20293-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20293-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20292-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20293-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)