Skip to main content

Why Does It Matter How Creative Writing Is Taught?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Writing Fantasy and the Identity of the Writer

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture ((PASCC))

  • 591 Accesses

Abstract

Charalambous provides a comprehensive review of Creative Writing pedagogies to date with the objective of allowing the reader to consider the assumptions behind the Creative Writing courses they have been taught and pointing to the scarce qualitative research about students’ Creative Writing texts and Creative Writing exercises currently in the field. Three distinct strands in the literature of Creative Writing are discussed: Creative Writing in relation to Literature, to the self (or shift of self) and to research. The first section deals with the conceptual bases of Creative Writing, referring to its relationship to Romanticism, New Criticism, Theory and the workshop. Next follows an analytical account of the literary, the therapeutic, the political and the research conceptions of Creative Writing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The study of Creative Writing as a subject is interlinked with its scholarship and the ideologies espoused about writing (studies). By “writing ideologies,” I mean here a particular line of logic followed with regard to the function of writing: for example, we might say that our practice is informed by the ideology that writing is an art form that can be used for raising political awareness or that writing is an art that does not have to have a specific purpose.

  2. 2.

    Interestingly, the concept of ‘creativity accessible to all’ became the symbol for democracy andcapitalist productivity,’ during the 1920s and 1930s. Similarly, in a post-industrial narrative, the ethos of a creative class is an argued ‘force for economic growth’ (Dawson 2005, p. 46; see also Webb 2012 on a further critique). This aspect of “artistic spirit,” then, by the name of “creativity,” might be perceived both as a mode of social expression and suppression.

  3. 3.

    The Ancient Greek connotations to ‘mimesis’ are a matter of debate, however.

  4. 4.

    Attesting to the complex interstices of links in literary theory, New Criticism, which arose in the middle decades of the twentieth century, is connected to Formalism, defined as the study of the literary text concerned with the purposes of the text focusing on form, not external influences (Waugh, 2006, see pp. 212–22, and pp. 165–75). It arose as a reaction to Romanticist theories of the individual writer and genius, originating from Russian formalism, and afterward Anglo-American New Criticism (ibid.).

  5. 5.

    It is (ironically) defined as ‘a building in which manual labour took place’ (Dawson 2005, p. 81).

References

  • Andrew, M., & Arnold, J. (2011). Collaboration, Community, Identity: Engaged E-Learning and E-Teaching in an Online Writing Course. In Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Proceedings Ascilite 2011 Hobart (pp. 106–117). Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/downloads/papers/Andrew-full.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C., & Bizzaro, P. (2017). Research in Creative Writing: Theory into Practice. Research in the Teaching of English, 52(1), 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shir, D. (2007). The Endless Search: Writing As a Way of Being. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 4(3), 188–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shir, D. (2008). Born to Write: Discovery and Construction of Self in the Identity Stories of Poets and Writers. Qualitative Sociology Review, 4(1), 21–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, J. (1996). Psychoanalytic Diary Writing and the Transformation of Self and Society. Psychoanalysis Culture and Society, 1(1), 123–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulter, A. (2004). Assessing the Criteria: An Argument for Creative Writing Theory. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 1(2), 134–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracher, M. (1999). The Writing Cure: Psychoanalysis, Composition and the Aims of Education. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, K. (1998). Creativity: Psychoanalysis, Surrealism and Creative Writing. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, K. (2006). Repulsion and Day-Dreaming: Freud Writing Freud. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 3(2), 132–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, K. (2009). Patterns of Creativity: Investigations into the Sources and Methods of Creativity. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, M. (2011). How to Read Like a Writer. In C. Lowe & P. Zemliansky (Eds.), Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing, Volume 1 (pp. 71–86). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press. Retrieved from https://wac.colostate.edu/books/writingspaces2/bunn%2D%2Dhow-to-read.pdf

  • Cain, M. A. (2010). A Space of Radical Openness: Re-visioning the Creative Writing Workshop. In D. Donnelly (Ed.), Does the Writing Workshop Still Work? (New Writing Viewpoints). Bristol, Buffalo, and Toronto: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M. A. (2017). Collaborative Story Writing and the Question of Influence. In D. M. Clark, T. Hergenrader, & J. Rein (Eds.), Creative Writing Innovations: Breaking Boundaries in the Classroom (pp. 125–139). London, Oxford, and New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M., Hergenrader, T., & Rein, J. (2017). Creative Writing Innovations: Breaking Boundaries in the Classroom. London, Oxford, and New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, K. (2006). Short Fiction. In G. Harper (Ed.), Teaching Creative Writing. London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, A. (2011a). Blind Spots, What Creative Writing Does Not Know. 15(1). [Online no pages]. Retrieved from http://www.textjournal.com.au/april11/cowan.htm

  • Cowan, A. (2011b, October 18). Interview with Cowan Andrew. Retrieved from http://www.newwriting.net/feature/%E2%80%98we-speak-we-write-in-order-to-call-back-what-we-are-missing%E2%80%99/

  • Cowan, A. (2012). A Live Event, a Life Event: The Workshop That Works. 16(1). [Online no pages]. Retrieved from http://www.textjournal.com.au/april12/cowan.htm

  • Dawson, P. (2005). Creative Writing and the New Humanities. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P. (2006). Writers, Critics and Literary Authority. In N. Krauth & T. Brady (Eds.), Creative Writing: Theory Beyond Practice. Teneriffe: Post Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P. (2008). Creative Writing and Post-modern Interdisciplinarity. 12(1). [Online no pages]. Retrieved from http://www.textjournal.com.au/april08/dawson.htm

  • DeWitt, H. (2012). A Short History of Creative Writing in America. In H. Beck (Ed.), Teaching Creative Writing. New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan (Published in Association with the English Subject Centre).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, D. (2010). Does the Writing Workshop Still Work? (New Writing Viewpoints Series). Buffalo, Toronto, and London: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, D. (2013). Re-shaping Creative Writing: Power and Agency in the Academy. In D. Donnelly & G. Harper (Eds.), Key Issues in Creative Writing (New Writing Viewpoints Series). Buffalo, Toronto, and London: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, D. (2019). Building and Mobilizing a Sustainable, Knowledge-Based Culture for Creative Writing Studies. New Writing, 16(1), 116–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein-Jannai, M. (2010). Some Remarks about Semi-automatic Writing: Between Constraints and Possibilities in a Writing Workshop. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 7(1), 58–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, E. (2017). Multiple Facets of the Developing Writer. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 14, 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, A. (2006). Writing and Danger: The Intercorporeality of Affect. In N. Krauth & T. Brady (Eds.), Creative Writing: Theory Beyond Practice. Teneriffe: Post Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haake, K. (2005). Dismantling Authority: Teaching What We Do Not Know. In A. Leahy (Ed.), Power and Identity in the Creative Writing Classroom: The Authority Project (New Writing Viewpoints). Bristol, Buffalo, and Toronto: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haake, K. (2010). Re-envisioning the Workshop: Hybrid Classrooms, Hybrid Texts. In D. Donnelly (Ed.), Does the Writing Workshop Still Work? (New Writing Viewpoints). Bristol, Buffalo, and Toronto: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haake, K. (2012). Thinking Systematically About What We Do. In H. Beck (Ed.), Teaching Creative Writing. New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan (Published in Association with the English Subject Centre).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, G. (2013). Creative Writing Research. In D. Donnelly & G. Harper (Eds.), Key Issues in Creative Writing (New Writing Viewpoints Series). Buffalo, Toronto, and London: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, G. (Ed.). (2015). Creative Writing and Education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, G. (Ed.). (2017a). Changing Creative Writing in America: Strengths, Weaknesses and Possibilities. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, G. (2017b). The UnWorkshop. In D. M. Clark, T. Hergenrader, & J. Rein (Eds.), Creative Writing Innovations: Breaking Boundaries in the Classroom (pp. 27–38). London, Oxford, and New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (2003). Signifying Pain: Constructing and Healing the Self Through Writing. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, G. (2012). The Irrational Element in the Undergraduate Poetry Workshop. In H. Beck (Ed.), Teaching Creative Writing. New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan (Published in Association with the English Subject Centre).

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, S. (2009, January). The Rise of Creative Writing and the New Value of Creativity. PhD thesis. Retrieved from https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/54437/Healey_umn_0130E_10355.pdf?sequence=1

  • Hecq, D. (2005). The Poetic Text and Its Theoretical Gesturing. TEXT, 9(1). [Online no pages]. Retrieved from http://www.textjournal.com.au/april05/hecq.htm

  • Hecq, D. (2009). Interactive Narrative Pedagogy as Heuristic for Understanding Supervision in Practice-Led Research. International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 6, 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecq, D. (Ed.). (2012a). The Creativity Market: Creative Writing in the 21st Century (New Writing Viewpoints). Bristol, Buffalo, and Toronto: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecq, D. (2013). Creative Writing and Theory: Theory Without Credentials. In J. Kroll & G. Harper (Eds.), Research Methods in Creative Writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecq, D. (2015). Towards a Poetics of Creative Writing (New Writing Viewpoints). Bristol, Buffalo, and Toronto: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hecq, D., & Novitz, J. (Eds.). (2018). Creative Writing with Critical Theory: Inhabitation. Canterbury: Gylphi Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hergenrader, T. (2016). Making Space for Creative Writing Research in the Academy. Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 1(1), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, C. (2013). Transformative Learning Through Creative Life Writing: Exploring the Self in The Learning Process. USA and Canada: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. (1987). Adult Learning in Social Context. London: Croon Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, T. (2011). ‘Pleasure Balks, Bliss Appears’ or ‘The Apparatus Shines Like a Blade’: Towards a Theory of a Progressive Reading Praxis in Creative Writing Pedagogy. TEXT Journal, 15(2). [Online no pages]. Retrieved from http://www.textjournal.com.au/oct11/jarvis.htm

  • Koehler, A. 2013. “Digitizing Craft: Creative Writing Studies and New Media: A Proposal.” College English, 75(4), 379–397. Retrieved June 2014, from http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Journals/CE/0754-mar2013/CE0754Digitizing.pdf

  • Kroll, J., & Harper, G. (2013). Research Methods in Creative Writing. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leahy, A., Halloran, L., & Jaenichen, C. (2014). Text(ure), Modelling, Collage: Creative Writing and the Visual Arts. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 11(1), 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leahy, A., et al. (Eds.). (2016). What We Talks about When We Talk about Creative Writing (New Writing Viewpoints). UK, USA and Canada: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, G. (1995). The Literature of the Unpublished: Student Conceptions of Creative Writing in Higher Education. PhD thesis, Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRobert, M. (2013). Modeling the Creative Writing Process. In J. Kroll & G. Harper (Eds.), Research Methods in Creative Writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, P. (2008). Suddenness: On Rapid Knowledge. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 5(3), 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manery, R. (2015). Revisiting the Pedagogy and Theory Coral: Creative Writing Pedagogy Teachers’ Conceptions of Pedagogic Identity. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 12, 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, S. (2012). Undergraduate Creative Writing Provision in the UK: Origins, Trends and Student Views. In H. Beck (Ed.), Teaching Creative Writing. New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan (Published in Association with the English Subject Centre).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayers, T. (2005). (Re)writing Craft: Composition, Creative Writing, and the Future of English Studies (Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy and Culture). Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayers, T. (2017). Notes Toward an Inventive, Process-Oriented Pedagogy for Introductory Multigenre Creative Writing Courses. In H. Clark & J. Rein (Eds.), Creative Writing Innovations: Breaking Boundaries in the Classroom. London, Oxford, and New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgelow, V. L. (2013). Sensualities: Experiencing/Dancing/Writing. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 10(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholes, J. (2017). Measuring Writing Engagement and Emotional Tone in L2 Creative Writing: Implications for Interdisciplinarity. Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 2(1), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, R. (2005). Creative Writing: Education, Culture and Community. Leicester: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, H. (2012). Hidden Purposes of Undergraduate Creative Writing: Power, Self and Knowledge. In H. Beck (Ed.), Teaching Creative Writing. New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan (Published in Association with the English Subject Centre).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peary, A., & Hunley, T. C. (Eds.). (2015). Creative Writing Pedagogies for the 21st Century. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, G. (2007). This Story Wants to be Danced: Creative Writing, Dance, Convergence and Confluence. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 4(2), 135–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piller, E. (2017). What’s Creative about Creative Writing? Critical Pedagogy and Transversal Creativity. Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, R. (2012). Re … creation, Critique, Catalysis: Critical-Creative Rewriting in Theory and Practice. In H. Beck (Ed.), Teaching Creative Writing. New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan (Published in Association with the English Subject Centre).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rein, J. M. (2011). Write What You Don’t Know: Teaching Creative Research. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 8(2), 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, K., & Vanderslice, S. (2007). Can It Really Be Taught? Resisting Lore in Creative Writing Pedagogy. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarrimo, C. (2010). Creative Writing as a Communicative Act—An Artistic Method. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 7(3), 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P. (2017). Pedagogy and Authority in Teaching The Waste Land: What We Do with Authorial Voices and the Postcolonial Body in the Writing Workshop. In D. M. Clark, T. Hergenrader, & J. Rein (Eds.), Creative Writing Innovations: Breaking Boundaries in the Classroom (pp. 230–241). London, Oxford, and New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. (2005). The Writing Experiment: Strategies for Innovative Creative Writing. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. (2006a). Emerging from the Experiment: A Systematic Methodology for Creative Writing Teaching. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 3(1), 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. (2006b). The Posthuman and the Writing Process: Emergence, Algorithm, Affect and Multimodality. In N. Krauth & T. Brady (Eds.), Creative Writing: Theory Beyond Practice. Teneriffe: Post Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. (2017). Word and Sound Relationships in Creative Writing Pedagogy. In D. M. Clark, T. Hergenrader, & J. Rein (Eds.), Creative Writing Innovations: Breaking Boundaries in the Classroom (pp. 63–76). London, Oxford, and New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swiss, T., & Damon, M. (2006). New Media Literature. In N. Krauth & T. Brady (Eds.), Creative Writing: Theory Beyond Practice. Teneriffe: Post Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderslice, S. (2006). Workshopping. In G. Harper (Ed.), Teaching Creative Writing. London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderslice, S. (2012). The Lynchpin in the Workshop: Student Critique and Reflection. In H. Beck (Ed.), Teaching Creative Writing. New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan (Published in Association with the English Subject Centre).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wandor, M. (2008). The Author Is Not Dead, Merely Somewhere Else: Creative Writing Reconceived. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, P. (Ed.). (2006). Literary Theory and Criticism: An Oxford Guide. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J. (2012). Creativity and the Marketplace. In D. Hecq (Ed.), The Creativity Market: Creative Writing in the 21st Century (New Writing Viewpoints). Bristol, Buffalo, and Toronto: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J. (2015). Researching Creative Writing. Newmarket: Frontinus Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, C. (2015). Yoga Minds, Writing Bodies: Contemplative Writing Pedagogy. WAC Clearlinghouse. (E-book).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, C., & Wright, J. (2018). How Creative Does Writing Have to Be in Order to Be Therapeutic? A Dialogue on the Practice and Research of Writing to Recover and Survive. Journal of Poetry Therapy, 31(2), 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, C. (2006). Writing, Textual Culture and the Humanities. In N. Krauth & T. Brady (Eds.), Creative Writing: Theory Beyond Practice. Teneriffe: Post Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. (2011). L2 Creative Writers: Identities and Writing Processes. PhD thesis, University of Warwick, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. (2015). Second Language Creative Writers: Identities and Writing Processes (New Writing Viewpoints). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Charalambous, Z. (2019). Why Does It Matter How Creative Writing Is Taught?. In: Writing Fantasy and the Identity of the Writer. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20263-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics