Skip to main content

The Power of the “Pursuit” Learning Paradigm in the Partitioning of Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1953 Accesses

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1000))

Abstract

Traditional Learning Automata (LA) work with the understanding that the actions are chosen purely based on the “state” in which the machine is. This modus operandus completely ignores any estimation of the Random Environment’s (RE’s) (specified as \(\mathbb {E}\)) reward/penalty probabilities. To take these into consideration, Estimator/Pursuit LA utilize “cheap” estimates of the Environment’s reward probabilities to make them converge by an order of magnitude faster. This concept is quite simply the following: Inexpensive estimates of the reward probabilities can be used to rank the actions. Thereafter, when the action probability vector has to be updated, it is done not on the basis of the Environment’s response alone, but also based on the ranking of these estimates. While this phenomenon has been utilized in the field of LA, until recently, it has not been incorporated into solutions that solve partitioning problems. In this paper (The second author gratefully acknowledges the partial support of NSERC, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada), we will submit a complete survey of how the “Pursuit” learning paradigm can be and has been used in Object Partitioning. The results demonstrate that incorporating this paradigm can hasten the partitioning by a order of magnitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The bibliography in this paper is necessarily limited. The majority of the present results very briefly summarize the results in the Ph.D. thesis of the First Author.

  2. 2.

    To be consistent with the terminology of LA, we use the terms “action”, “class” and “group” synonymously.

  3. 3.

    The OMA’s algorithms/figures are in [11], and omitted here in the interest of space.

References

  1. Godsil, C., Royle, G.F.: Algebraic Graph Theory, vol. 207. Springer, New York (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Biggs, N.: Algebraic Graph Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Fayyoumi, E., Oommen, B.J.: Achieving microaggregation for secure statistical databases using fixed-structure partitioning-based learning automata. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B (Cybern.) 39(5), 1192–1205 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Freuder, E.C.: The object partition problem. Vision Flash, WP-(4) (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gale, W., Das, S., Yu, C.T.: Improvements to an algorithm for equipartitioning. IEEE Trans. Comput. 39(5), 706–710 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jobava, A.: Intelligent traffic-aware consolidation of virtual machines in a data center. Master’s thesis, University of Oslo (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lanctot, J.K., Oommen, B.J.: Discretized estimator learning automata. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 22(6), 1473–1483 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Mamaghani, A.S., Mahi, M., Meybodi, M.: A learning automaton based approach for data fragments allocation in distributed database systems. In: 2010 IEEE 10th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT), pp. 8–12. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oommen, B.J., Ma, D.C.Y.: Stochastic automata solutions to the object partitioning problem. Carleton University, School of Computer Science (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oommen, B.J., Agache, M.: Continuous and discretized pursuit learning schemes: various algorithms and their comparison. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B: Cybern. 31(3), 277–287 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shirvani, A.: Novel solutions and applications of the object partitioning problem. Ph.D. thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yazidi, A., Granmo, O.C., Oommen, B.J.: Service selection in stochastic environments: a learning-automaton based solution. Appl. Intell. 36(3), 617–637 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Amer, A., Oommen, B.J.: A novel framework for self-organizing lists in environments with locality of reference: lists-on-lists. Comput. J. 50(2), 186–196 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. John Oommen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shirvani, A., Oommen, B.J. (2019). The Power of the “Pursuit” Learning Paradigm in the Partitioning of Data. In: Macintyre, J., Iliadis, L., Maglogiannis, I., Jayne, C. (eds) Engineering Applications of Neural Networks. EANN 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1000. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20257-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20257-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20256-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20257-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics