Skip to main content

Computing a Consensus Phylogeny via Leaf Removal

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Bioinformatics Research and Applications (ISBRA 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 11490))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 689 Accesses

Abstract

Given a set \(\mathcal{T} = \{T_1, T_2, \ldots , T_m\}\) of phylogenetic trees with the same leaf-label set X, we wish to remove some leaves from the trees so that there is a tree T with leaf-label set X displaying all the resulting trees. One objective is to minimize the total number of leaves removed from the trees, while the other is to minimize the maximum number of leaves removed from an input tree. Chauve et al. [6] refer to the problem with the first (respectively, second) objective as AST-LR (respectively, AST-LR-d), and show that both problems are NP-hard. They further present algorithms for the parameterized versions of both problems, but it seems that their algorithm for the parameterized version of AST-LR is flawed [7]. In this paper, we present a new algorithm for the parameterized version of AST-LR and also show that Chauve et al.’s algorithm for the parameterized version of AST-LR-d can be sped up by an exponential factor. We further design heuristic integer-linear programming (ILP for short) models for AST-LR and AST-LR-d. Our experimental results show that the heuristic models can be used to significantly speed up solving the exact models proposed in [7].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aho, A.V., Sagiv, Y., Szymanski, T.G., Ullman, J.D.: Inferring a tree from lowest common ancestors with application to the optimization of relational expressions. SIAM J. Comput. 10, 405–421 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Baroni, M., Grunewald, S., Moulton, V., Semple, C.: Bounding the number of hybridisation events for a consistent evolutionary history. J. Math. Biol. 51, 171–182 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Beiko, R.G., Hamilton, N.: Phylogenetic identification of lateral genetic transfer events. BMC Evol. Biol. 6, 15 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bordewich, M., Semple, C.: On the computational complexity of the rooted subtree prune and regraft distance. Ann. Comb. 8, 409–423 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Buneman, P.: The recovery of trees from measures of dissimilarity. In: Kendall, D., Tauta, P. (eds.) Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences, pp. 387–395. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chauve, C., Jones, M., Lafond, M., Scornavacca, C., Weller, M.: Constructing a consensus phylogeny from a leaf-removal distance (extended abstract). In: Fici, G., Sciortino, M., Venturini, R. (eds.) SPIRE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10508, pp. 129–143. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67428-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, Z.-Z., Ueta, S., Li, J., Wang, L.: Finding a center tree of phylogenetic trees via leaf removal. In: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cole, R., Farach-Colton, M., Hariharan, R., Przytycka, T.M., Thorup, M.: An \(O(n\log n)\) algorithm for the maximum agreement subtree problem for binary trees. SIAM J. Comput. 30, 1385–1404 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Guillemot, S., Mnich, M.: Kernel and fast algorithm for dense triplet inconsistency. Theor. Comput. Sci. 494, 134–143 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, M., Tromp, J., Zhang, L.: On the nearest neighbour interchange distance between evolutionary trees. J. Theor. Biol. 182, 463–467 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma, B., Wang, L., Zhang, L.: Fitting distances by tree metrics with increment error. J. Comb. Optim. 3, 213–225 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Maddison, W.P.: Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46, 523–536 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakhleh, L., Warnow, T., Lindner, C.R., John, K.S.: Reconstructing reticulate evolution in species - theory and practice. J. Comput. Biol. 12, 796–811 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Robinson, D., Foulds, L.: Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math. Biosci. 53, 131–147 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Swofford, D., Olsen, G., Waddell, P., Hillis, D.: Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis, D., Moritz, D., Mable, B. (eds.) Molecular Systematics, 2nd edn, pp. 407–514. Sinauer Associates, Sunderiand (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhi-Zhong Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chen, ZZ., Ueta, S., Li, J., Wang, L. (2019). Computing a Consensus Phylogeny via Leaf Removal. In: Cai, Z., Skums, P., Li, M. (eds) Bioinformatics Research and Applications. ISBRA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11490. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20242-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20242-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20241-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20242-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics