Skip to main content

Introduction: Why We Need Political Science of Religion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Political Science of Religion
  • 475 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter addresses three main deficiencies in the political science literature dealing with the relationship between politics and religion: its narrowly legalistic-institutional approach, resulting in viewing the political significance of religion exclusively through models of “church-state relations”; its normative overload, whereby the research is informed by philosophical preconceptions on the proper place of religion in the public sphere; and its methodological eclecticism, resulting in the failure to provide a coherent account of religion as a power resource and religious organizations as political actors, grounded in theoretical frameworks of political science. The critique is a starting point to proposing political science of religion as a consistently political science approach supplanting the “church and state” and “religion and politics” paradigms and integrating the study of religion into the mainstream of the discipline, instead of singling it out for a special treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Chapters 3 and 4 of Part II are based on my previous Polish-language book (Potz 2016) devoted entirely to theocratic political systems.

  2. 2.

    There are, admittedly, less teleological versions of deliberative democracy, i.e. not explicitly invoking reaching consensus on common good as the ultimate goal of deliberation.

  3. 3.

    To take another example, authors of a selection of sources on the attitude of various religious groups to the Polish constitution finish their perceptive and highly informative introduction with an odd conclusion that the “influence of religious communities, and particularly the Catholic church” on the Constitution “may not be assessed positively” (Borecki and Janik 2012, 42). Such an evaluation adds nothing to the content of the study, poses the question of the normative standpoint from which it is made and, ultimately, works to undermine the credibility of the authors.

References

  • Bärsch, C.-E. (2009). Basic Outlines of the ‘Political Science of Religion’. In R. Sonnenschmidt & B. C. Labuschange (Eds.), Religion, Politics and Law: Philosophical Reflections on the Sources of Normative Order in Society. Leiden and Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borecki, P., & Janik, C. (2012). Uwarunkowania i przebieg prac nad nową polską konstytucją ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem roli kościołów i organizacji światopoglądowych. In P. Borecki & C. Janik (Eds.), Kościoły i organizacje światopoglądowe o nowej polskiej konstytucji. Warszawa: Elipsa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoński, P. (2014). Modele relacji między religią i polityką. In: Religia i polityka. Zarys problematyki, P. Burgoński, M. Gierycz (Eds.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberle, E. J. (2011). Church and State in Western Society. Established Church, Cooperation and Separation. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enyedi, Z. (2003). Conclusion: Emerging Issues in the Study of Church-state Relations. West European Politics, 26(1), 218–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, S. (2009). Churches as Societal Veto Players: Religious Influence in Actor-Centred Theories of Policy-Making. West European Politics, 32(1), 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddy, C. W., & Lynn, B. W. (2008). First Freedom First. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, A. (2001). Religion and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 117–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, J. (Ed.). (2006). The Politics of Religion. A Survey. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, J. (Ed.). (2016). Routledge Handbook of Religion and Politics (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzke, A. (2009). Religious Interest Groups in American Politics. In C. E. Smidt, L. A. Kellstedt, & J. L. Guth (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevtić, M. (2007). Political Science and Religion. Politics and Religion Journal, 1(1), 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettell, S. (2016). Do We Need a Political Science of Religion? Political Studies Review, 14(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalczyk, K. (2012). Partie i ugrupowania parlamentarne wobec Kościoła katolickiego w Polsce w latach 1989–2011. Szczecin: Zapol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marczewska-Rytko, M. (2018). Politologia religii jako subdyscyplina religioznawstwa i/lub nauk o polityce. In M. Marczewska-Rytko & D. Maj (Eds.), Politologia religii. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. D. (2016). The Myth of Normative Secularism. Religion and Politics in the Democratic Homeworld. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (2007). Religion Is Not a Preference. The Journal of Politics, 69(2), 351–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, B. (1999–2000). Religion and State in Europe and Israel. Israel Affairs, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus, R. J. (1986). The Naked Public Square. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potz, M. (2010). The Unfulfilled Promise? Deliberative Democracy vs. Political Participation. Polish Political Science Yearbook, XXXIX: 108–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potz, M. (2016). Teokracje amerykańskie. Źródła i mechanizmy władzy usankcjonowanej religijnie. Łódź: Łódź University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. In The Law of Peoples with “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smidt, C. E., Kellstedt, L. A., & Guth, J. L. (Eds.). (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Religion and American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, K. D., & Wilcox, C. (2006). Getting Religion: Has Political Science Rediscovered the Faith Factor? American Political Science Review, 100(4), 523–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, C. (2001). Confessions of an Interest Group: The Catholic Church and Political Parties in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zrinščak, S. (2011). Church, State and Society in Post-Communist Europe. In J. M. Barbalet, A. Possamai, & B. S. Turner (Eds.), Religion and the State. A Comparative Sociology. London; New York; Delhi: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maciej Potz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Potz, M. (2020). Introduction: Why We Need Political Science of Religion. In: Political Science of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20169-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics