Abstract
Recent election cycles in the United States and in other democracies have often been accompanied by accusations of hacking, meddling, disinformation, and voter suppression by non-state actors as well as elected government officials. Such threats pose a grave danger to the perceived legitimacy of democratic elections and public trust in the institutions upon which representative democracy relies. This paper utilizes an agent-based modeling approach to simulate the impact of actions by nefarious state and non-state actors on voter turnout, trust in electoral democracy, misrepresentation, and the potential for political conflict. Through repeated simulation and the development of a landscape of plausible futures, this paper uncovers means by which the electoral process may be most sensitive to attack. Given that the potential erosion of trust in elections poses an existential threat to democracy itself, this paper should provide valuable insight for those who seek to preserve and protect the most fundamental elements of liberal democracy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/
Hetherington, M.: Putting polarization in perspective. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 39(2), 413–448 (2009)
Sokhey, A., McClurg, S.: Social networks and correct voting. J. Polit. 74(3), 751–764 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381612000461
Esteban, J., Schneider, G.: Polarization and conflict: theoretical and empirical issues: introduction. J. Peace Res. 45(2), 131–141 (2008)
Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J., Osborn, T.: Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: the political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Polit. Psychol. 25(1), 65–95 (2004)
Price, V., Cappella, J., Nir, L.: Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Polit. Commun. 19(1), 95–112 (2002)
Warren, M.: Trust and Democracy. The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)
Downs, A.: An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper, New York (1957)
FiveThirtyEight. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-many-times-the-average-person-moves/
New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/23/us/gerrymandering-states.html
Huffington Post. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/obama-gerrymandering_us_5c1de4b08aaf7a8826f5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stowell, N., Thomas, N. (2020). Nefarious Actors: An Agent-Based Analysis of Threats to the Democratic Process. In: Cassenti, D. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and Simulation. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 958. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20148-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20148-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20147-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20148-7
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)