Skip to main content

Gender Differences Measured on Driving Performances in an Urban Simulated Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors and Simulation (AHFE 2019)

Abstract

For decades, researchers have highlighted significant differences in gender and age groups in terms of driving behaviour. There are several studies, concerning gender, about the different perceptions of risk, traffic accident involvement and risky driving. The present research is a part of a research project about risk perception between genders that aims to estimate and quantify gender differences in terms of driving behaviour. In particular, this paper aims to focus on differences between male and female drivers in performing stopping maneuver in an urban environment. As confirmed by several medical studies, the gender difference involves cognitive and psychophysiological differences, which have a significant impact on the risk perception assessment. In the past, several researches have investigated gender differences on driving behaviour through questionnaire, statistical analysis and psychological driving task, but today technological advances have allowed the development of new tools to study the drivers’ behaviour. In fact, many studies in the field of road safety were recently conducted with the virtual reality driving simulator. In this instance, the analysis is carried out through the virtual reality driving simulator, situated in the LASS3 Virtual Reality Laboratory of University Research Centre for Road Safety, by implementing a simulated scenario of an urban condition with many sudden events (e.g. intersection, pedestrian crossing, merging vehicle into the traffic, etc.) that can lead to a stopping maneuver. The LASS3 virtual reality driving simulator collects all the kinematic and dynamic driving measures (e.g. speed, acceleration, position respect to the lane, pedal pressure, etc.) with a frequency of 0.1 s. A sample of 40 drivers were subjected to the driving test and the results of three indicators of risk perception are studied in order to confirm the results of the previous analysis. The selected indicators for the analysis are: time to collision (TTC), pressure on brake pedal (PB) and slip ratio (SR). As results show, male and female drivers have a different behaviour in performing stopping maneuver. Even if they have the same perception of the potential risk of the road environment (TTC values), they perform in a very different way the stopping maneuver: men more carefully than women (PB, SR).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mariotti, R., Biapencheri, R., Dell’Orso, L.: Un approccio di genere alla salute. Atti del Convegno Da Esculapio a Igea. University Press, Pisa (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lavoro, A.E.: Stress legato all’attività lavorativa. Lussemburgo (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rosiello, A., Quarà, L.: Lo stress correlato al lavoro e le differenze di genere. Pianeta Lavoro e Tributi (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simon, F., Corbett, C.: Road traffic offending, stress, age, and accident history among male and female drivers. Ergonomics 39, 757–780 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D’Ambrosio, L.A., Donorfio, L.K., Coughlin, J.F., Mohyde, M., Meyer, J.: Gender differences in self-regulation patterns and attitudes toward driving among older adults. J. Women Aging 20, 265–282 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenbloom, S., Herbel, S.: The safety and mobility patterns of older women. Public Works Manage. Policy 13(4), 338–353 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wickens, M., Mann, R., Stoduto, G., Anca, I., Smart, R.: Age group differences in self-reported aggressive driving perpetration and victimization. Transp. Res. Part F 14(5), 400–412 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hennessy, D.A., Wiesenthal, D.L., Wickens, C., Lustman, M.: The impact of gender and stress on traffic aggression: are we really that different? In: Focus on Aggression Research, pp. 157–174 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fletcher, D.: A five year study of effects of fines, gender, race and age on illegal parking in spaces reserved for people with disabilities. Rehabil. Psychol. 40, 203–210 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hayward, J.: Near Miss Determination Through Use of a Scale of Danger. The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parker, D., Lajunen, T., Stradling, S.: Attitudinal predictors of interpersonally aggressive violations on the road. Transp. Res. Part F 1, 11–24 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Laapotti, S., Keskinen, E., Rajalin, S.: Comparison of young male and female drivers’ attitude and self-reported traffic behaviour in Finland in 1978 and 2001. J. Saf. Res. 34(5), 579–587 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pradhan, A.K., Li, K., Bingham, R., Simons-Morton, B.G., Ouimet, M.C., Shope, J.T.: Peer passenger influences on male adolescent drivers’ visual scanning behavior during simulated driving. J. Adolesc. Health 54, S42–S49 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Farah, H.: Age and gender differences in overtaking maneuvers on two-lane rural highways. Trasp. Res. Rec. 30–36 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. De Blasiis, M., Ferrante, C., Veraldi, V., Moschini, L.: Risk perception assessment using a driving simulator: a gender analysis. Road Safety and Simulation – RSS Proceedings. The Hague (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Underwood, G., Crundall, D., Chapman, P.: Driving simulator validation with hazard perception. Transp. Res. 14(6), 435–446 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bella, F.: Driving simulator for speed research on two-lane rural roads. Accid. Anal. Prev. 40, 1078–1087 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bella, F.: Validation of a driving simulator for work zone design. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1937, 136–144 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Calvi, A., Benedetto, A., De Blasiis, M.: A driving simulator study of driver performance on deceleration lanes. Accid. Anal. Prev. 45, 195–203 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cuevas, A., Febrero, M., Fraiman, R.: An ANOVA test for functional data. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 47(1), 111–122 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Van der Horst, R.: A time-based analysis of road user behaviour in normal and critical encounters. Delft University of Technology (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  22. De Blasiis, M., Ferrante, C., Veraldi, V., Santilli, A.: Weaving lanes in different operating speed conditions: a driving simulator study. Advances in Transportation Studies: an international Journal, Section A 40 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lee, C., Hedrick, K., Yi, K.: Real-time slip-based estimation of maximum tire–road friction coefficient. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 9(2), 454–458 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Ferrante .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ferrante, C., Varladi, V., De Blasiis, M.R. (2020). Gender Differences Measured on Driving Performances in an Urban Simulated Environment. In: Cassenti, D. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and Simulation. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 958. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20148-7_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics