Skip to main content

The Ergonomics of Work Conditions as Force Element of the OHS Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Social and Occupational Ergonomics (AHFE 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 970))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The effectiveness of systemic occupational health and safety management is linked inextricably to the nature and scope of improvement measures. In improving OHS management, organizations which have a management system in place need to account for all factors affecting their ability to secure their desired outcomes. Such outcomes include the satisfaction of ergonomic criteria, whose application enhances the robustness of systemic management defined as the successful establishment of worker-friendly working conditions. In addition, one of the most critical focal points emphasized in the ergonomic principles that constitute an integral part of systemic management is the role of worker and factors related to the working environment. Organizations that recognize such factors while complying with ergonomic standards will be able to fully enjoy an effective management system and ultimately generate benefits for the organization itself and its stakeholders. The paper underlines the importance of ergonomic standards governing the effectiveness of systemic occupational health and safety management. It identifies ergonomic requirements as a key to improving the effectiveness of systemic management while recognizing that failures to satisfy such requirements will inevitably undermine such effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Górny, A.: The use of working environment factors as criteria in assessing the capacity to carry out processes. In: Oancea, G., Drăgoi, M.V. (eds.) MATEC Web of Conferences (The 4th International Conference on Computing and Solutions in Manufacturing Engineering 2016, CoSME 2016), vol. 94, no. 06011 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rae, A., Provan, D.: Safety work versus the safety of work. Saf. Sci. 111, 119–127 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berlik, M., Dahlke, G., Sławińska, M.: The idea of modification of work conditions for the reduction of the pilot’s workload in a glider. J. KONBiN 45(1), 7–16 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Górny, A.: The role of safety in ensuring efficient working conditions. In: Fertsch, M., et al. (eds.) Engineering and Technology Research (24th International Conference on Production Research, ICPR 2017), pp. 348–353. DEStech Publications Inc., Lancaster (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jørgensen, K.: Prevention of “simple accidents at work” with major consequences. Saf. Sci. 81, 46–58 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ISO 45001:2018, Occupational health and safety management systems. Requirements with guidance for use. ISO, Geneva (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li, Y., Guldenmund, F.W.: Safety management systems: a broad overview of the literature. Saf. Sci. 103, 94–123 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arntz-Gray, J.: Plan, do, check, act: the need for independent audit of the internal responsibility system in occupational health and safety. Saf. Sci. 84, 12–23 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dahlke, G.: Zarzadzanie bezpieczeństwem pracy i higieną pracy. Modele systemowego zarządzania bezpieczeństwem i higieną pracy. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej, Poznań (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guo, Ch., Khan, F., Imtiaz, S.: Risk assessment of process system considering dependencies. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 55, 204–212 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohammed, H.K., Knapkova, A.: The impact of total risk management on company’s performance. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 220, 271–277 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ISO 31000:2009, Risk management. Principles and guidelines. ISO, Geneva (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kiran, D.R.: Total Quality Management. Key Concepts and Case Studies. Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, H., Xie, M., Goh, T.N.: A comparative study of the prioritization matrix method and the analytic hierarchy process technique in quality function deployment. Total Qual. Manag. 9(6), 421–430 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Warszawska, K., Kraslawski, A.: Method for quantitative assessment of safety culture. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 42, 27–34 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Givehchi, S., Hemmativaghef, E., Hoveidi, H.: Association between safety leading indicators and safety climate levels. J. Saf. Res. 62, 23–32 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Haslam, Ch., O’Hara, J., Kazi, A., Twumasi, R., Haslam, R.: Proactive occupational safety and health management: promoting good health and good business. Saf. Sci. 81, 99–108 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Crutchfield, N., Roughton, J.: Safety Culture. An Innovative Leadership Approach. Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Górny, A.: Use of quality management principles in the shaping of work environment. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Posters Extended Abstracts: International Conference, HCI International 2015 (part II). CCIS, 529, pp. 136–142 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Burgess-Limerick, R.: Participatory ergonomics: evidence and implementation lessons. Appl. Ergonomics 68, 289–293 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Górny, A.: Total quality management in the improvement of work environment - conditions of ergonomics. In: Goossens, R.H.M. (ed.) Advances in Social & Occupational Ergonomics, AHFE 2017 International Conference. AISC, vol. 605, pp. 91–100. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Górny, A., Sadłowska-Wrzesińska, J.: Ergonomics aspects in occupational risk management. In: Arezes, P., et al. (eds.) Occupational Safety and Hygiene, SHO 2016, pp. 102–104. Portuguese Society of Occupational Safety and Hygiene (SPOSHO), Guimarães (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Khan, F., Rathnayaka, S., Ahmed, S.: Methods and models in process safety and risk management: Past, present and future. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 98, 116–147 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Labuttis, J.: Ergonomics as element of process and production optimization. Procedia Manuf. 3, 4168–4172 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zio, E.: The future of risk assessment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 177, 176–190 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Górny .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Górny, A. (2020). The Ergonomics of Work Conditions as Force Element of the OHS Management. In: Goossens, R., Murata, A. (eds) Advances in Social and Occupational Ergonomics. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 970. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20145-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20145-6_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20144-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20145-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics