Skip to main content

Comparative Assessment of Classroom Desk Dimensions with Respect to Students Anthropometry for Females Middle Schools

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors (AHFE 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 967))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1243 Accesses

Abstract

This study compares six classroom desk dimensions to students’ anthropometry for female middle schools in Libya. The assessed desk dimensions include seat height, seat depth and seat width, desk height, backrest height, and under-surface of desk height. These dimensions were compared to the related anthropometric data of 90 students. The comparison was carried out using six equations (obtained from the literature). Results of the comparison showed that the size of the desk is not suitable for a large proportion of the students. Seat height, desk height and backrest height were found high for a large proportion of the students. Also, seat depth and width were found small for a very large proportion of the students. Under desk height was the only desk dimension that was found suitable for most of the students. Two alternative proposed designs of the desk were considered. Both showed significant improvement compared to the current design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Altaboli, A., Elfituri, O., Alturkey, A., Dogman, M., Almagrhi, M.: Anthropometric evaluation of the classroom desk for middle schools. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Taiar, R. (eds.) Human Systems Engineering and Design. IHSED 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 876. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altaboli, A., Nawras, N., Mahdi, A., Alzardomi, H., Alyseri, M., Alkendi, M.: Anthropometric evaluation of the design of the classroom desk for the eighth and the ninth grades of Benghazi schools. In: Goonetilleke, R., Karwowski, W. (eds.) Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 602. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Altaboli, A., Elhinaid, M., Alasbali, A., Egjam, I.: Anthropometric evaluation of the design of the classroom desk for the sixth and the seventh grades of Benghazi schools. In: Goonetilleke, R., Karwowski, W. (eds.) Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 489. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Altaboli, A., Belkhear, M., Bosenina, A., Elfsei, N.: Anthropometric evaluation of the design of the classroom desk for the fourth and fifth grades of Benghazi primary schools. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Schmorrow, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics International Conference 2015, Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 3, pp. 5655–5662. Elsevier B.V, Amsterdam (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Altaboli, A., Ahmida, R., Elmgrab, M., Immraga, H., Othman, R.: Anthropometric evaluation of proposed improved designs of the classroom desk for Benghazi primary schools. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 59(1), 426–430 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Parcells, C., Manfred, S., Hubbard, R.: Mismatch of classroom furniture and body dimensions, empirical findings and health implications. J. Adolesc. Health 24(4), 265–273 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gouvali, M.K., Boudolos, K.: Match between school furniture dimensions and children anthropometry. Appl. Ergonomics 37(6), 765–773 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Agha, S.: School furniture match to students’ anthropometry in the Gaza Strip. Ergonomics 53(3), 344–354 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Castellucci, H., Arezes, P., Molenbroek, J.: Analysis of the most relevant anthropometric dimensions for school furniture selection based on a study with students from one Chilean region. Appl. Ergonomics 46, 201–211 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Castellucci, H.I., Arezes, P.M., Molenbroek, J.F.M.: Applying different equations to evaluate the level of mismatch between students and school furniture. Appl. Ergonomics 45, 1123–1132 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Macedo, A., Morais, A., Martins, F., Martins, J., Pais, S., Mayan, O.: Match between classroom dimensions and students’ anthropometry: re-equipment according to european educational furniture standard. Hum. Factors 57(1), 48–60 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yant, A.C., Chih-Wei Lu, A., Jun-Ming Lu, b.: Evaluation of the Indonesian national standard for elementary school furniture based on children’s anthropometry. Appl. Ergonomics 62, 168–181 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahamed Altaboli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Altaboli, A., Akrim, A., Omar, E., Hamad, F., Ahmed, S. (2020). Comparative Assessment of Classroom Desk Dimensions with Respect to Students Anthropometry for Females Middle Schools. In: Goonetilleke, R., Karwowski, W. (eds) Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 967. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20142-5_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20142-5_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20141-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20142-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics