Skip to main content

A Study of Metacognitive Problem Solving in Undergraduate Engineering Students

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 963))

Abstract

One of the key challenges in engineering education is the problem of teaching future engineers’ professional skills. Engineering students need to know what they do and do not know. This is termed metacognition. There is still quite a bit that we do not know about how metacognition develops in classroom settings. In this study, we discuss an exploration of these issues using both physical and virtual reality (VR) simulations of manufacturing systems; which are performed by student teams. We discuss the incorporation of measures of metacognition into a model of conflict and error to predict what types of experiences may be most helpful to produce improved metacognition in engineering students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/

  2. Levesque, K., Laird, J., Hensley, E., Choy, S.P., Cataldi, E.F., Hudson, L.: Career and Technical Education in the United States: 1990 to 2005. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2008-035. National Center for Education Statistics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aqlan, F., Al-Fandi, L.: Prioritizing process improvement initiatives in manufacturing environments. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 196, 261–268 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sengul, S., Katranci, Y.: Meta-cognitive aspects of solving indefinite integral problems. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci 197, 622–629 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. García Peñalvo, F.J.: Entrepreneurial and problem solving skills in software engineers. J. Inf. Technol. Res. 8, iv–vi (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bickhard, M.H.: Why children don’t have to solve the frame problems: cognitive representations are not encodings. Dev. Rev. 21, 224–262 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Visser, W.: The Cognitive Artifacts of Designing. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Flavell, J.H.: Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. Am. Psychol. 34, 906 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Flavell, J.H., Friedrichs, A.G., Hoyt, J.D.: Developmental changes in memorization processes. Cogn. Psychol. 1, 324–340 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Markman, E.M.: Realizing that you don’t understand: a preliminary investigation. Child Dev. 48(3), 986–992 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schraw, G., Dennison, R.: Assessing meta-cognitive awareness. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 19, 460–475 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Garrison, D.R., Akyol, Z.: Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. Internet High. Educ. 24, 66–71 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zohar, A., Lustov, E.: Challenges in Addressing Metacognition in Professional Development Programs in the Context of Instruction of Higher-Order Thinking. Contemporary Pedagogies in Teacher Education and Development. Intech Open (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coutinho, M.V., Redford, J.S., Church, B.A., Zakrzewski, A.C., Couchman, J.J., Smith, J.D.: The interplay between uncertainty monitoring and working memory: can metacognition become automatic? Mem. Cogn. 43, 990–1006 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Akturk, A.O., Sahin, I.: Literature review on metacognition and its measurement. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 15, 3731–3736 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. van Gog, T., Jarodzka, H.: Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance cognitive and metacognitive processes in computer-based learning environments. In: International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies, pp. 143–156. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lawanto, O., Santoso, H.B.: Development and validation of the engineering design metacognitive questionnaire. In: American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cooke, R.A., Szumal, J.L.: Measuring normative beliefs and shared behavioral expectations in organizations: the reliability and validity of the organizational culture inventory. Psychol. Rep. 72, 1299–1330 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jackson, S.A., Marsh, H.W.: Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: the flow state scale. J. Sport. Exerc. Psychol. 18, 17–35 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Green, D.M., Swets, J.A.: Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Wiley, New York (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Salvucci, D.D., Goldberg, J.H.: Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. In: Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium, pp. 71–78. ACM Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rayner, K.: The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 62, 1457–1506 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Costa-Gomes, M., Crawford, V.P., Broseta, B.: Cognition and behavior in normal-form games: an experimental study. Econ. 69, 1193–1235 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Orquin, J.L., Ashby, N.J.S., Clarke, A.D.F.: Areas of interest as a signal detection problem in behavioral eye-tracking research. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 29, 103–115 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. (1830741). Awarded 8/1/18.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Jo Elliott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Elliott, L.J., Lum, H.C., Aqlan, F., Zhao, R., Lasher, C.D. (2020). A Study of Metacognitive Problem Solving in Undergraduate Engineering Students. In: Karwowski, W., Ahram, T., Nazir, S. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 963. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20135-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20135-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20134-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20135-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics