Skip to main content

Building Robust Prediction Models for Defective Sensor Data Using Artificial Neural Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 950))

Abstract

Sensors are susceptible to failure when exposed to extreme conditions over long periods of time. Besides they can be affected by noise or electrical interference. Models (Machine Learning or others) obtained from these faulty and noisy sensors may be less reliable. In this paper, we propose a data augmentation approach for making neural networks more robust to missing and faulty sensor data. This approach is shown to be effective in a real life industrial application that uses data of various sensors to predict the wear of an automotive fuel-system component. Empirical results show that the proposed approach leads to more robust neural network in this particular application than existing methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ali, J.B., Chebel-Morello, B., Saidi, L., Malinowski, S., Fnaiech, F.: Accurate bearing remaining useful life prediction based on weibull distribution and artificial neural network. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 56(57), 150–172 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allred, D., Harvey, J.M., Berardo, M., Clark, G.M.: Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod. Pathol.: Off. J. US Can. Acad. Pathol. Inc. 11(2), 155–168 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. In: 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 2911–2918. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baxt, W.G.: Use of an artificial neural network for data analysis in clinical decision-making: the diagnosis of acute coronary occlusion. Neural Comput. 2(4), 480–489 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gülçehre, Ç., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., Bengio, Y.: Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2014, 25–29 October 2014, Doha, Qatar, A meeting of SIGDAT, a Special Interest Group of the ACL, pp. 1724–1734 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dziubiński, M., Drozd, A., Adamiec, M., Siemionek, E.: Electromagnetic interference in electrical systems of motor vehicles. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 148, p. 012036. IOP Publishing (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elleithy, K., Sobh, T.: Innovations and Advances in Computer, Information, Systems Sciences, and Engineering, vol. 152. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jäger, G., Zug, S., Brade, T., Dietrich, A., Steup, C., Moewes, C., Cretu, A.M.: Assessing neural networks for sensor fault detection. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Virtual Environments for Measurement Systems and Applications (CIVEMSA), pp. 70–75, May 2014

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klambauer, G., Unterthiner, T., Mayr, A., Hochreiter, S.: Self-normalizing neural networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, 4-9 December 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, pp. 972–981 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maier, H.R., Dandy, G.C.: Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environ. Model. Softw. 15(1), 101–124 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maybeck, P.: Stochastic Models, Estimation, and Control. Mathematics in Science and Engineering. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Moghaddam, A.H., Moghaddam, M.H., Esfandyari, M.: Stock market index prediction using artificial neural network. J. Econ. Financ. Adm. Sci. 21(41), 89–93 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Perez, L., Wang, J.: The effectiveness of data augmentation in image classification using deep learning. ArXiv e-prints, December 2017

    Google Scholar 

  14. Redman, T.C., Blanton, A.: Data Quality for the Information Age. Artech House, Inc., London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Refenes, A.N., Zapranis, A., Francis, G.: Stock performance modeling using neural networks: a comparative study with regression models. Neural Netw. 7(2), 375–388 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reuss, P., Stram, R., Althoff, K., Henkel, W., Henning, F.: Knowledge engineering for decision support on diagnosis and maintenance in the aircraft domain. In: Synergies Between Knowledge Engineering and Software Engineering, pp. 173–196. Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shekar, A.K., Bocklisch, T., Sánchez, P.I., Straehle, C.N., Müller, E.: Including multi-feature interactions and redundancy for feature ranking in mixed datasets. In: Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases - European Conference, ECML PKDD 2017, Skopje, Macedonia, 18–22 September 2017, Proceedings, Part I, pp. 239–255 (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Sietsma, J., Dow, R.J.: Creating artificial neural networks that generalize. Neural Netw. 4(1), 67–79 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G.E., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R.: Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15(1), 1929–1958 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Tu, J.V.: Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 49(11), 1225–1231 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Widrow, B., Rumelhart, D.E., Lehr, M.A.: Neural networks: applications in industry, business and science. Commun. ACM 37(3), 93–105 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu, X., Wu, X.: Class noise vs. attribute noise: a quantitative study. Artif. Intell. Rev. 22(3), 177–210 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the support of NVIDIA Corporation with the donation of the Titan X Pascal GPU used for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cláudio Rebelo de Sá .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

de Sá, C.R., Shekar, A.K., Ferreira, H., Soares, C. (2020). Building Robust Prediction Models for Defective Sensor Data Using Artificial Neural Networks. In: Martínez Álvarez, F., Troncoso Lora, A., Sáez Muñoz, J., Quintián, H., Corchado, E. (eds) 14th International Conference on Soft Computing Models in Industrial and Environmental Applications (SOCO 2019). SOCO 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 950. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20055-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics