Abstract
The reliability of human being has been paid increasing attention by engineers in recent years, which significantly increases the success of aerospace mission. Many Human Reliability Analysis methods, which are referred to HRA have been proposed to quantify Human Error Probability (namely HEP) in the past few decades. This paper takes crew human reliability into account and present its concept. Then, an assessment method for crew human reliability is proposed basing on Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method, referred to as CREAM, and this assessment method mainly focuses on how to make accurate quantification model on crew errors. Finally, an example about the crew of fueling process in space launch is evaluated to show the usage of the model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hollnagel, E.: Chapter 1 - The state of human reliability analysis. In: Hollnagel, E. (ed.) Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method, pp. 1–21. Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford (1998)
Balbir, S.: Human reliability with human factors. Microelectron. Reliab. 26, 994–995 (1986)
Williams, H.L.: Reliability evaluation of the human component in man-machine systems. Electr. Manuf. 61, (1958)
Sasou, K., Reason, J.: Team errors: definition and taxonomy. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 65, 1–9 (1999)
Rouse, W.B., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E.: The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. IEEE Transact. Syst. Man Cybern. 22, 1296–1308 (1992)
Sasou, K., Takano, K., Yoshimura, S.: Modeling of a team’s decision-making process. Saf. Sci. 24, 13–33 (1996)
Shu, Y., Furuta, K., Kondo, S.: Team performance modeling for HRA in dynamic situations. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 78, 111–121 (2002)
Chang, Y.H.J., Mosleh, A.: Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92, 997–1013 (2007)
Chang, Y.H.J., Mosleh, A.: Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. Part 2: IDAC performance influencing factors model. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92, 1014–1040 (2007)
Chang, Y.H.J., Mosleh, A.: Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. Part 4: IDAC causal model of operator problem-solving response. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92, 1061–1075 (2007)
Hollnagel, E.: Chapter 6 - CREAM — A second generation HRA Method. In: Hollnagel, E. (ed.) Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method, pp. 151–190. Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford (1998)
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants No. 71571004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, X., Zhang, W., Pan, X., Liu, T. (2020). Method for Crew Human Reliability Analysis Based on CREAM. In: Boring, R. (eds) Advances in Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 956. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20037-4_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20037-4_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20036-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20037-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)