Skip to main content

The Relevance of Identifying and Naming Emotional Workplace Abuse

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emotional Workplace Abuse

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the complexity of naming and identifying emotional workplace abuse (EWA) and discusses why addressing emotional abuse is difficult for the targets. We approach these obstacles by using three levels of analysis based on feminist research on violence: publicā€“private distinction, a continuum of violence and negative response to disclosing of abuse. On the basis of the interview and narrative data, it is shown that, even though there is extensive literatureĀ and policies on bullying and mobbing, targets may have difficulty recognizing indirect and subtle forms of abuse as workplace violence and violations. The chapter shows how the obstacles to identifying EWA are related to toxic organizational cultures and the reluctance of leadership to take the issue seriously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acker, Joan. 1992. Gendering Organisational Theory. In Gendering Organizational Analysis, ed. Albert J. Mills and Peta Tancred, 248ā€“260. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • ā€”ā€”ā€”. 2003. Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations. In Reader in Gender, Work and Organization, ed. Robin J. Foldy, Erica Gabrielle Foldy, Maureen A. Scully, and the Center for Gender in Organizations Simmons School of Management, 49ā€“61. Cornwall: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Acker, Joan, and Donald R. Van Houten. 1974. Differential Recruitment and Control: The Sex Structuring of Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 9 (2): 152ā€“163.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Anderson, Kristin L. 2002. Perpetrator or Victim?: Relationships Between Intimate Partner Violence and Well-Being. Journal of Marriage and Family 64: 851ā€“863.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Andersson, Lynne, and Christine Pearson. 1999. Tit for Tat? The Spiraling Effect of Incivility in the Workplace. Academy of Management Review 24 (3): 452ā€“471.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Anderson, Reid. 1997. The Envious will to Power. Journal of Analytical Psychology 42: 363ā€“382.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Attila, Henna, Marjut PietilƤinen, Miina Keski-PetƤjƤ, PƤivi Hokka, and Markku Nieminen. 2018. Tasa-arvobarometri 2017 [Gender Equality Barometer 2017]. Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriƶn julkaisuja 8/2018. Accessed November 9, 2018. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-00-3932-5.

  • Barling, Julian. 1996. The Prediction, Experience, and Consequences of Workplace Violence. In Violence on the Job: Identifying Risks and Developing Solutions, ed. G.R. VandenBos and E.Q. Bulatao, 29ā€“49. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bass, Bernard M. 1990. From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to Share the Vision. Organizational Dynamics 18 (3): 19ā€“31.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bennett, Rebecca, and L. Sandra Robinson. 2000. Development of a Measure of Workplace Deviance. The Journal of Applied Psychology 85: 349ā€“360.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bjƶrkqvist, Kaj, Karin Ɩsterman, and Monika Hjelt-BƤck. 1994. Aggression among University Employees. Aggressive Behavior 20 (3): 173ā€“184.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Braverman, Mark. 1999. Preventing Workplace Violence: A Guide for Employers and Practitioners. London: Sage.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • ā€”ā€”ā€”. 2004. Abuse and Violence in the Workplace and School: Toward a Systems-Based Model. In Aggression in Organizations: Violence, Abuse, and Harassment at Work and in Schools, ed. Robert Gefner, Mark Braverman, Joseph Galasso, and Janessa Marsh, 1ā€“11. Binghamton, NY: Hayworth Maltreatment and Trauma Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cortina, Lilia, Vicki Magley, Jill Williams, and Regina Day Langhout. 2001. Incivility in the Workplace: Incidence and Impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 6 (1): 64ā€“80.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Einarsen, StĆ„le, and BjĆørn Inge Raknes. 1991. Mobbing i arbeidslivet [Bullying at Work]. Research Centre for Occupational Health and Safety: University of Bergen.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Einarsen, StĆ„le, Helge Hoel, Dieter Zapf, and Cary Cooper. 2003. The Concept of Bullying at Work. The European Tradition. In Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace. International Perspectives in Research and Practice, ed. StĆ„le Einarsen, Helge Hoel, and Cary Cooper, 3ā€“30. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Frost, Peter J. 2003. Toxic Emotions at Work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Glomb, T.M. 2002. Workplace Anger and Aggression: Informing Conceptual Models with Data from Specific Encounters. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 7: 20ā€“36.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hearn, Jeff. 1998. The Violences of Men. London: Sage.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hearn, Jeff, Irina Novikova, Iva Smidova, Marjut Jyrkinen, LeeAnn Iovanni, FĆ”tima Arranz, Voldemar Kolga, Dag Balkmar, and Marek Wojtaszek. 2013. Studying Menā€™s Violences: Some Key Methodological Principles in Developing a European Research Framework. Masculinities and Social Change 2 (1): 82ā€“115.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hearn, Jeff, and Wendy Parkin. 1995. ā€˜Sexā€™ at ā€˜Workā€™: The Power and Paradox of Organisation Sexuality. Rev. ed. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall; New York: St. Martinā€™s Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Heikkinen, Suvi, and Anna-Maija LƤmsƤ. 2017. Narratives of Spousal Support for the Careers of Men in Managerial Posts. Gender, Work and Organization 24 (2): 171ā€“193.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hoel, Helge, and Cary Cooper. 2000. Destructive Conflict & Bullying at Work. Study Report. Manchester School of Management, University of Manchester, Institute of Science and Technology.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hoel, Helge, Cary L. Cooper, and Brian Faragher. 2001. The Experience of Bullying in Great Britain: The Impact of Organizational Status. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 10 (4): 443ā€“465.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Johnson, Michael P. 2006. Conflict and Control Gender Symmetry and Asymmetry in Domestic Violence. Violence Against Women 12 (1): 1003ā€“1018.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Jyrkinen, Marjut. 2014. Women Managers, Careers and Gendered Ageism. Scandinavian Journal of Management. An International Journal 30 (2): 175ā€“185.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kainulainen, Heini, and Anniina Kaittila. 2019. Pelolla kahlitut. ParisuhdevƤkivaltaa kokeneiden naisten hauras toimijuus esitutkinnassa. (KƤsikirjoitus 11.1.2019.)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Keashley, Loraleigh. 1997. Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: Conceptual and Empirical Issues. Journal of Emotional Abuse 1 (1): 85ā€“117.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Keashley, Loraleigh, and Karen Jagatic. 2003. By Any Other Name: American Perspectives on Workplace Bullying. In Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace. International Perspectives in Research and Practice, ed. StĆ„le Einarsen, Helge Hoel, and Cary Cooper, 31ā€“61. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kelly, Liz. 1987. Sexual Violence as a Continuum. In Women, Violence and Social Control, ed. Jalna Hanmer and Mary Maynard, 46ā€“60. London: Macmillan.

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Koonin, Michele, and Thomas M. Green. 2004. The Emotionally Abusive Workplace. The Journal of Emotional Abuse 4 (3ā€“4): 71ā€“79.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lammers, Marianne, Jane Ritchie, and Neville Robertson. 2008. Womenā€™s Experience of Emotional Abuse in Intimate Relationships. Journal of Emotional Abuse 5 (1): 29ā€“64.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lehto, Anna-Maija. 2009. Increase in Number of Women in Supervisory Posts. Eurofund, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Accessed April 12, 2019. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/article/2009/increase-in-number-of-women-in-supervisory-posts.

  • Luoma-aho, Vilma, Marita Vos, Raimo Lappalainen, Anna-Maija LƤmsƤ, Outi Uusitalo, Petri Maaranen, and Aleksi Koski. 2012. Added Value of Intangibles for Organizational Innovation. Human Technology 8 (1): 7ā€“23.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lutgen-Sandvik, Pamela. 2003. The Communicative Cycle of Employee Emotional Abuse, Generation and Regeneration of Workplace Mistreatment. Management Communication Quarterly 16 (4): 471ā€“501.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Matthiesen, Stig Berge, BjĆørn Inge Raknes, and Olav RĆøkkum. 1989. Mobbing pĆ„ arbeidsplassen [Bullying in the Workplace]. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening 26: 761ā€“774.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • McKie, Linda. 2005. Families, Violence and Social Change. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • McKie, Linda, and Marjut Jyrkinen. 2017. ā€œMyManagementā€: Female Managers Meet the Sexualised and Gendered Working Life. Gender in Management: An International Journal 32 (2): 98ā€“110.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • NƤre, Sari, and Suvi Ronkainen. 2008. Paljastettu intiimi. Sukupuolistuneen vƤkivallan dynamiikka [Revealed Intimacy: The Dynamics of Gendered Violence]. Tampere: University of Lapland.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Niemistƶ, Charlotta, Mira Karjalainen, and Jeff Hearn. 2017. ā€œPakko painaa pitkƤƤ pƤivƤƤā€: Tyƶn ja muun elƤmƤn vƤliset hƤmƤrtyvƤt rajat tietotyƶssƤ [Forced to Long Days: Work and Non-work Blurring Boundaries in Knowledge Work]. In Tyƶaikakirja, ed. Mika Helander, Ilkka LevƤ, and Sanna Saksela-Bergholm, 147ā€“170. Helsinki: Into Kustannus.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Parent-Thirion, AgnĆØs, Enrique FernĆ”ndez-MacĆ­as, John Hurley, and Greet Vermeylen. 2007. Fourth European Working Conditions Survey. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Accessed April 12, 2019. http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2006/98/en/2/ef0698en.pdf.

  • Penttinen, Elina. 2018. Gender, Agency and Violence. In Routledge Handbook of Gender and Security, ed. L. Shepherd, C. Gentry, and L. Sjoberg. London: Routledge.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Rayner, Charlotte, Helge Hoel, and Cary L. Cooper. 2002. Workplace Bullying. What We Know, Who is to Blame, and What Can We Do? London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Richman, Judith, Kathleen Rospenda, Stephanie Nawyn, Joseph Flaherty, Michael Fendrich, Melinda Drum, and Timothy Johnson. 1999. Sexual Harassment and Generalized Workplace Abuse among University Employees: Prevalence and Mental Health Correlates. American Journal of Public Health 89 (3): 358ā€“363.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ronkainen, Suvi. 2008. Kenen ongelma vƤkivalta on? Suomalainen hyvinvointivaltio ja vƤkivallan toimijuus. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka 73 (4): 388ā€“401.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Salin, Denise. 2001. Prevalence and Forms of Bullying Among Business Professionals: A Comparison of Two Different Strategies for Measuring Bullying. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 10 (4): 425ā€“441.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • ā€”ā€”ā€”. 2003. The Significance of Gender in the Prevalence, Forms and Perceptions of Bullying. Nordiske Organisasjonsstudier 5 (3): 30ā€“50.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Sanderson, Kathy. 2017. Workplace Ostracism: Critical Discourse Analysis of the Lived Experience. PhD diss., St. Maryā€™s University. Accessed November 8, 2018. http://library2.smu.ca/handle/01/27039#.W-RJ99UzZ0w.

  • Siltala, Heli, Juha Holma, and Maria Hallman-Keiskoski. 2014. Henkisen, fyysisen ja seksuaalisen lƤhisyhdevƤkivallan vaikutukset psykososiaaliseen hyvinvointiin [Impact of Physical and Sexual Intimate Violence on Psycho-Social Well-Being]. Psykologia 49 (2): 113ā€“120.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Vartia, Maarit. 1991. Bullying at Workplaces. In Towards the 21st century. Proceedings from the International Symposium on Future Trends in the Changing Working Life, ed. S. Lehtinen, J. Rantanen, P. Juuti, A. Koskela, K. Lindstrƶm, P. Rehnstrƶm, and J. Saari, 131ā€“135. Helsinki: Institute of Occupational Health.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Velonis, Alisa J. 2016. ā€œHe Never Did Anything You Typically Think of as Abuseā€: Experiences With Violence in Controlling and Non-Controlling Relationships in a Non-Agency Sample of Women. Violence Against Women 22 (9): 1031ā€“1054.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • York, M.R. 2011. Gender Attitudes and Violence Against Women. El Paso: LFB Scholar.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Zapf, Dieter, StĆ„le Einarsen, Helge Hoel, and Maarit Vartia. 2011. Empirical Findings on Bullying in the Workplace. In Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace. International Perspectives in Research and Practice, ed. StĆ„le Einarsen, Helge Hoel, and Cary Cooper, 75ā€“105. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elina Penttinen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Penttinen, E., Jyrkinen, M., Wide, E. (2019). The Relevance of Identifying and Naming Emotional Workplace Abuse. In: Emotional Workplace Abuse. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19993-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics