Abstract
In the first decade of the twenty-first century, the BBC’s NHU changed its treatment of environmental programmes from acting as a neutral observer of wildlife to taking a more active role in environmental debates. This shift can be related to changes in the life sciences’ relationship to the environment with the emergence of the biodiversity movement in the 1990s, and the development of what has been called an endangerment sensibility. These changes in the life sciences conflated conservation activism with the biological study of biodiversity. But could the endangerment sensibility be a consequence of the repeated exposure of life scientists to wildlife documentaries?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Richard Brock, 2007, Oral history interview. Wildscreen.
- 2.
George Monbiot, ‘David Attenborough has betrayed the living world he loves’, The Guardian, 7 November 2018. Available online at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/07/david-attenborough-world-environment-bbc-films. Last accessed 3 April 2019.
- 3.
Lucy Mangan, ‘Our planet review—Attenborough’s first act as an eco-warrior’, The Guardian, 5 April 2019. Available online at https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2019/apr/05/our-planet-review-david-attenborough-netflix-eco-warrior-activist-bbc. Last accessed 5 April 2019.
- 4.
See for instance G. Monbiot, 2018, ‘David Attenborough has betrayed the living world he loves’, The Guardian, 7 November 2018. Available Online at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/07/david-attenborough-world-environment-bbc-films. Last accessed 14 April 2018.
- 5.
References
Anker, P. (2001). Imperial ecology: Environmental order in the British Empire, 1895–1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Benson, E. (2016). Endangered birds and epistemic concerns. In F. Vidal & N. Dias (Eds.), Endangerment, biodiversity and culture (pp. 175–194). London: Routledge.
Blewitt, J. (2010). Media, ecology and conservation: Using the media to protect the world’s wildlife and ecosystems. London: Green books.
Canales, J. (2011). Desired machines: Cinema and the world in its own image. Science in Context, 24(3), 329–359.
Gouyon, J.-B. (2011). From Kearton to Attenborough: Fashioning the telenaturalist’s identity. History of Science, 49(1), 25–60.
Mitman, G. (1999). Reel nature: America’s romance with wildlife on film. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Parsons, C. (1996). The electronic zoo and other components of Wildscreen world—A new approach to wildlife visitors attractions about the natural world. Conference Proceedings, Trends in Leisure and Entertainment, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 159–167.
Richards, M. (2013). Global nature, global brand: BBC Earth and David Attenborough’s landmark wildlife series. Media International Australia, 146(1), 143–154.
Richards, M. (2014). The wildlife docusoap: A new ethical practice for wildlife documentary? Television & New Media, 15(4), 321–335.
Sepkoski, D. (2016). Extinction, diversity, and endangerment. In F. Vidal & N. Dias (Eds.), Endangerment, biodiversity and culture (pp. 62–86). London: Routledge.
Takacs, D. (1996). The idea of biodiversity: Philosophies of paradise. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Vidal, F., & Dias, N. (Eds.). (2016). Endangerment, biodiversity and culture. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gouyon, JB. (2019). Afterword. In: BBC Wildlife Documentaries in the Age of Attenborough. Palgrave Studies in Science and Popular Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19982-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19982-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19981-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19982-1
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)