Abstract
This chapter combines findings from science education and communications to assess whether nanotechnology is an ideal topic to improve science and scientific literacy. It differentiates science from scientific literacy and discusses them with respect to technical audiences and the general public. Framing the social narrative around emerging technologies is critical for improving the scientific literacy of any audience, even when done at the expense of increasing science content knowledge. The role of technical experts in educating the general public is discussed, and the chapter concludes with practical perspectives for nanotechnology practitioners—the scientists, engineers, and educators who specialize in nanotechnology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved September 30, 2017, from http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/intro.htm.
Bach, A.-M., & Waitz, T. (2015). International activities in nanoscale science and engineering education. In New perspectives in science education. Retrieved September 29, 2017, from https://conference.pixel-online.net/npse2013/common/download/Paper_pdf/034-STM03-FP-Bach-NPSE2013.pdf.
Castellini, O. M., et al. (2007). Nanotechnology and the public: Effectively communicating nanoscale science and engineering concepts. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 9(2), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-006-9160-z.
Duncan, K. A., et al. (2010). Art as an avenue to science literacy: Teaching nanotechnology through stained glass. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(10), 1031–1038. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed1000922.
Feinstein, N. W. (2015). Education, communication, and science in the public sphere. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21192.
Greenberg, A. (2009). Integrating nanoscience into the classroom: Perspectives on nanoscience education projects. ACS Nano, 3(4), 762–769. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn900335r.
Hoover, E., et al. (2009). Teaching small and thinking large: Effects of including social and ethical implications in an interdisciplinary nanotechnology course. Journal of Nano Education, 1(1), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1166/jne.2009.013.
Laherto, A. (2010). An analysis of the educational significance of nanoscience and nanotechnology in scientific and technological literacy. Science Education International, 21(3), 160–175. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ904866.
LeBlanc, S., Renninger, S., & Shittu, E. (2016a). Nanotechnology fellows program: Preparing undergraduate students for careers in nanotechnology. In Proceedings of ASEE conference & exposition (pp. 1–8). New Orleans, LA.
LeBlanc, S., Sorger, V., & Shittu, E. (2016b). Nanotechnology fellows program: An interdisciplinary practicum for nanotechnology undergraduate education. In Proceedings of the NSF-AAAS symposium on envisioning the future of undergraduate STEM education: Research and practice. Washington, DC.
Lee, C.-J., & Scheufele, D. A. (2006). The influence of knowledge and deference toward scientific authority: A media effects model for public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(4), 819–834. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300406.
Lee, C.-J., Scheufele, D. A., & Lewenstein, B. (2005). Public attitudes toward emerging technologies. Science Communication, 27(2), 240–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547005281474.
Maienschein, J., & Students. (1999). Commentary: To the future—Arguments for scientific literacy. Science Communication, 21(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547099021001003.
Malsch, I. (2008). Nano-education from a European perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 100(3), 032001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/100/3/032001.
McREL: Education and Public Outreach: NanoLeap: Home Page (n.d.). Retrieved September 30, 2017, from http://www2.mcrel.org/nanoleap/.
National Informal STEM Education Network. (n.d.) NISE network. Retrieved September 30, 2017, from http://www.nisenet.org/search/product_type/evaluation-and-research-32.
National Nanotechnology Initiative. (2016). 2016 NNI strategic plan. Retrieved September 30, 2017, from https://www.nano.gov/2016StrategicPlan.
Porter, A. L., & Youtie, J. (2009). How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(5), 1023–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9607-0.
Porter, L. A. (2007). Chemical nanotechnology: A liberal arts approach to a basic course in emerging interdisciplinary science and technology. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(2), 259. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed084p259.
Roco, M. C. (2002). Nanotechnology a frontier for engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(5), 488–497.
Roco, M. C. (2003a). Broader societal issues of nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 5(3/4), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025548512438.
Roco, M. C. (2003b). Converging science and technology at the nanoscale: Opportunities for education and training. Nature Biotechnology, 21(10), 1247–1249. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1003-1247.
Scheufele, D. A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2005). The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7(6), 659–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-005-7526-2.
Schönborn, K. J., et al. (2014). Development of an interactive immersion environment for engendering understanding about nanotechnology. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 5(2), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijvple.2014040104.
Stevens, S., Sutherland, L., & Krajcik, J. (2009). The big ideas of nanoscale science and engineering: A Guidebook for secondary teachers. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association. https://doi.org/10.2505/9781935155072.
Wang, H., et al. (2013). Development and evaluation of nanotechnology courses at The George Washington University. Journal of Nano Education, 5(1), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1166/jne.2013.1036.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation (EEC-1446001, NUE: An Interdisciplinary Practicum Approach to Nanotechnology Curricula Integration). The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
LeBlanc, S. (2020). Nanotechnology as a Tool for Science and Scientific Literacy. In: Norris, P., Friedersdorf, L. (eds) Women in Nanotechnology. Women in Engineering and Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19951-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19951-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19950-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19951-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)