Advertisement

Curiouser and Curiouser: The Wonderland of Emotion in LMOOCs

  • Elaine BeirneEmail author
  • Mairéad Nic Giolla Mhichíl
  • Conchúr Mac Lochlainn
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11475)

Abstract

Emotions and learning are inextricably linked and as such, computer-based learning environments should be cognisant of learning-enhancing emotions. More research, however, is needed to identify the factors that lead to specific emotions in digital and online learning environments, along with research to explore our understanding of the effects that different emotions can have on learning and on performance. This paper reports on a study-in-progress in the National Institute for Digital Learning in Dublin City University in Ireland, which is investigating the relationship between emotion and learning in Language MOOCs (LMOOCs). This study reports on preliminary findings of the first run of the Irish 101: Introduction to Irish Language and Culture, LMOOC, hosted on the FutureLearn platform. Using an experience sampling method, participants self-reported on their emotional experience after completing a range of activities during the three-week course. Initial findings show that Curiosity was the emotion participants felt most strongly, followed by Excitement, Hope and Pride. Affective states shifted over the duration of the course, most notably from week 1 to week 2, and following various MOOC activities. This paper concludes by providing an initial insight into the importance of considering learner affect in an LMOOC and in MOOCs more generally.

Keywords

Emotion Learning design Language learning MOOC 

References

  1. 1.
    Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., Perry, R.P.: Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educ. Psychol. 37(2), 91–105 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Pekrun, R.: Students’ emotions and academic engagement: introduction to the special issue. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 36(1), 1–3 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Efklides, A., Volet, S.: Feelings and emotions in the learning process. Learn. Instr. 15, 377–515 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D’Mello, S., Blanchard, N., Baker, R., Ocumpaugh, J., Brawner, K.: I feel your pain: a selective review of affect-sensitive instructional strategies. In: Sottilare, R., Graesser, A., Hu, X., Goldberg, B. (eds.) Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems - Volume 2: Instructional Management. U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Orlando (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goetz, T., Frenzel, A.C., Stoeger, H., Hall, N.C.: Antecedents of everyday positive emotions: an experience sampling analysis. Motiv. Emot. 34(1), 49–62 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D’Mello, S.: A selective meta-analysis on the relative incidence of discrete affective states during learning with technology. J. Educ. Psychol. 105(4), 1082–1099 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goetz, T., Frenzel, A.C., Pekrun, R., Hall, N.C.: The domain specificity of academic emotional experiences. J. Exp. Educ. 75(1), 5–29 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Bárcena, E., Martín-Monje, E.: Language MOOCs: an emerging field. In: Bárcena, E., Martín-Monje, E. (eds.) Language MOOCs: Providing Learning, Transcending Boundaries. Degruyter Open (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beirne, E., Nic Giolla Mhichíl, M., Cleircín, G.Ó.: LMOOCs, classifying design: survey findings from LMOOC providers. In: Borthwick, K., Bradley, L., Thouësny, S. (eds.) CALL in a Climate of Change: Adapting to Turbulent Global Conditions – Short Papers from EUROCALL 2017, pp. 30–34. Research-publishing.net (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dillon, J., Bosch, N., Chetlur, M.: Student emotion, co-occurrence, and dropout in a MOOC context. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. International Educational Data Mining Society (IEDMS), Raleigh (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leony, D., Muñoz-Merino, P.J., Ruipérez-Valiente, J.A., Pardo, A., Kloos, C.D.: Detection and evaluation of emotions in massive open online courses. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 21(5), 638–655 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wen, M., Diyi, Y., Rosé, C.P.: Sentiment analysis in MOOC discussion forums: what does it tell us? In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. International Educational Data Mining Society, London (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sokolik, M.: What constitutes an effective language MOOC? In: Bárcena, E., MartínMonje, E. (eds.) Language MOOCs: Providing Learning, Transcending Boundaries. Degruyter Open (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Pekrun, R.: The control-value theory of achievement emotions: assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 18(4), 315–341 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Larson, R., Csikszentmihalyi, M.: The experience sampling method. In: Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology, pp. 21–34. Springer, Dordrecht (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_2
  18. 18.
    Napa Scollon, C., Prieto, C.K., Diener, E.: Experience sampling: promises and pitfalls, strength and weaknesses. In: Diener, E. (ed.) Assessing Well-Being, vol. 39, pp. 157–180. Springer, Dordrecht (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pekrun, R., Vogl, E., Muis, K.R., Sinatra, G.M.: Measuring emotions during epistemic activities: the Epistemically-Related Emotion Scales. Cogn. Emot. 31(6), 1268–1276 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jarrell, A., Harley, J.M., Lajoie, S.P.: The link between achievement emotions, appraisals, and task performance: pedagogical considerations for emotions in CBLEs. J. Comput. Educ. 3(3), 289–307 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tong, E.M.W., et al.: Emotion and appraisal: a study using ecological momentary assessment. Cogn. Emot. 21(7), 1361–1381 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hurd, S.: Anxiety and non-anxiety in a distance language learning environment: the distance factor as a modifying influence. System 35(4), 487–508 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    de los Arcos, B., Coleman, J.A., Hampel, R.: Learners’ anxiety in audiographic conferences: a discursive psychology approach to emotion talk. ReCALL 21(1), 3–17 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elaine Beirne
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mairéad Nic Giolla Mhichíl
    • 1
  • Conchúr Mac Lochlainn
    • 1
  1. 1.Dublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations