Advertisement

Designing a MOOC – A New Channel for Teacher Professional Development?

  • Jean-François Van de Poël
  • Dominique VerpoortenEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11475)

Abstract

This paper investigates the pedagogical benefits that 17 lecturers involved in the design of a MOOC reported in a questionnaire survey. Results reveal a fair amount of gains for several teaching skills and a strong appreciation of the collective training approach practiced during the 9-month MOOCs production process. These findings are of interest to staff development units, technology-enhanced learning competent bodies, and researchers concerned with collective modalities for scholarship of teaching and learning.

Keywords

MOOCs Faculty development SoTL P.E.P.I.T.E. methodology Quality teaching criteria Chickering and gamson principles Margaryan principles Merrill principles 

References

  1. Alony, I., Kaye, S., Lambert, S.: MOOCs’ contribution to staff development and capacity building: Australian university case study. Paper presented at the 26th ICDE World Conference, Sun City, South Africa, October 2015Google Scholar
  2. Bali, M.: 5 reasons teachers should dip into MOOCs for professional development. MOOC News and Reviews, 12 July 2013Google Scholar
  3. Bartoletti, R.: Learning through design: MOOC development as a method for exploring teaching methods. Curr. Issues Emerg. eLearning 3(1), 2 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. Biggs, J.: Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. High. Educ. 32(3), 347–364 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castaigne, J.-L., Petit, L., Verpoorten, D.: Introducing teachers and instructional developers to learning objects four suggested shifts in prevailing discourse. In: Targamadze, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the Advanced Learning Technologies and Applications Conference (ALTA 2007), pp. 73–79. Technical University Kaunas, Kaunas (2007). http://hdl.handle.net/2268/152053
  6. Castaño-Muñoz, J., Kalz, M., Kreijns, K., Punie, Y.: Who is taking MOOCs for teachers’ professional development on the use of ICT? A cross-sectional study from Spain. Technol. Pedag. Educ. 27(5), 607–624 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chickering, A., Gamson, Z.: Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bull. 3, 7 (1987)Google Scholar
  8. Dikke, D., Faltin, N.: Go-Lab MOOC – an online course for teacher professional development in the field of Inquiry-based science education. Paper presented at the 7th Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Barcelona, Spain, July 2015Google Scholar
  9. Docq, F., Hamonic, E.: Why make MOOCs? Effects on on-campus teaching and learning. Paper presented at the Conference EMOOCs 2015, Mons, Belgium, May 2015Google Scholar
  10. Gherib, C., Dujardin, J.-M., Verpoorten, D.: MOOCs in business administration - an overview of assessment practice. In: Proceedings of the Conference of the European Association for Practitioner Research on Improving Learning (EAPRIL) 2015, Issue 2, pp. 258–268. EAPRIL Office, Leuven, Belgium (2016). http://hdl.handle.net/2268/194562
  11. Hew, K.: Promoting engagement in online courses: what strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCs. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 47(2), 320–341 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ho, A.D., et al.: HarvardX and MITx: Two years of open online courses. HarvardX Working Paper No. 10 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. Jobe, W., Östlund, C., Svensson, L.: MOOCs for Professional teacher development. In: Searson, M., Ochoa, M. (eds.) Proceedings of SITE 2014–Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, pp. 1580–1586. AACE, Jacksonville, Florida (2014)Google Scholar
  14. Koelher, M., Mishra, P.: Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teach. Coll. Rec. 108(6), 1017–1054 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koutsodimou, K., Jimoyiannis, A.: MOOCS for teacher professional development: Investigating views and perceptions of the participants. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Sevilla, Espana, November 2015Google Scholar
  16. Marquis, J.: Why MOOCs are good for teacher professional development! OnlineUniversities.com, 21 May 2013
  17. Misra, K.: MOOCs for teacher professional development: reflections and suggested actions. Open Prax. 10(1), 67–77 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laurillard, D.: The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students. Res. Learn. Technol. 24 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. Loisy, C., Van de Poël, J.-F., Verpoorten, D.: Regards croisés sur deux dispositifs de formation techno-pédagogique, leur outillage conceptuel et l’évaluation de leurs bénéfices. In: Detroz, P., Crahay, M., Fagnant, A. (dir.), L’évaluation à la lumière des contextes et des disciplines (p. 277–307). Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgique: De Boeck (2017). http://hdl.handle.net/2268/205471
  20. Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., Littlejohn, A.: Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Comput. Educ. 80, 77–83 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martone, A., Sireci, S.: Evaluating alignment between curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Rev. Educ. Res. 79(4), 1332–1361 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Merrill, M.: First principles of instruction. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 50(3), 43–59 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Najafi, H., Rolheiser, C., Harrison, L., Håklev, S.: University of Toronto instructors’ experiences with developing MOOCs. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 16(3), 233–255 (2015)Google Scholar
  24. Rivera N., Ramírez, M.: Digital skills development: MOOCs as a tool for teacher training. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Sevilla, Espana, November, 2015Google Scholar
  25. Seaton, D., Coleman, C., Daries, J., Chuang, I.: Teacher enrollment in MITx MOOCs: are we educating educators? Educause Rev. (2014)Google Scholar
  26. Tyler, R.W.: Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1949)Google Scholar
  27. Verpoorten, D., Jérôme, F., Delfosse, C., Detroz, P.: Infusing SoTL components in staff training - a faculty development continuum at the university of Liège. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Conference of the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL) - Leading Learning and the Scholarship of Change, Melbourne, Australia, October 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2268/187394
  28. Verpoorten, D., Leduc, L., Mohr, A., Marichal, E., Duchâteau, D., Detroz, P.: Feedback first year – a critical review of the strengths and shortcomings of a collective pedagogical project. In: Friberg, J., McKinney, K. (eds.) Applying the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Beyond the Individual Classroom Level. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (2017). http://hdl.handle.net/2268/206782

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IFRESUniversity of LiègeLiègeBelgium
  2. 2.CSEUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations