Advertisement

Post-Structuralist Hegemony

  • Alex WilliamsEmail author
Chapter
  • 369 Downloads
Part of the International Political Theory book series (IPoT)

Abstract

Laclau and Mouffe’s 1980s and 1990s expansion of the idea of hegemony in many respects marked an advance on that put forward by Gramsci. However, as this chapter argues, it also resulted in a number of problematic developments. While in some respects they were able to generalise the operation of hegemony to cover a far wider number of different forms of politics (from feminism to black civil rights and beyond), in other ways they simplified the variegated hegemony as understood by Gramsci into a thinner and ultimately less convincing form. This chapter sets out an analysis and critique of Laclau and Mouffe’s hegemony, from the standpoint of a political complexity theory. It concludes that while their expansion of the remit of hegemony was essential, their exact reformulation serves as an adequate modelisation of power and political contention in the limited arena of ideological political discourse.

Keywords

Hegemony Laclau Mouffe Complexity Discourse Radical democracy 

References

  1. Althusser, Louis, and Étienne Balibar. 1971. Reading Capital. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  2. Balibar, Étienne. 1991. From Class Struggle to Classless Struggle. In Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities, ed. Étienne Balibar, and Immanuel Wallerstein and Trans. C. Turner. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Boucher, Geoff. 2008. The Charmed Circle of Ideology: A Critique of Laclau & Mouffe, Butler & Žižek. Melbourne: re.press.Google Scholar
  4. Brassier, Ray. 2011. Concepts and Objects. In The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism, ed. Levi R. Bryant, Nick Srnicek, and Graham Harman, 47–66. Melbourne: re.press.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, Judith, Ernesto Laclau, and Slavoj Žižek. 2000. Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Crouch, Colin. 2004. Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Deleuze, Gilles. 1968. Difference and Repetition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1972. Anti-Oedipus. Trans. Robert Hurley, Mark Seem, and Helen Lane. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  9. Derrida, Jacques. 1982. Différance. In Margins of Philosophy, 1–29. Brighton: The Harvester Press Limited.Google Scholar
  10. Durbin, Michael. 2010. All About High-Frequency Trading. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Eagleton, Terry. 1991. Ideology: An Introduction. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Geras, Norman. 1988. Ex-Marxism Without Substance: Being a Real Reply to Laclau and Mouffe. New Left Review 169: 34–62.Google Scholar
  13. Gilbert, Jeremy. 2008. Anti-Capitalism and Culture: Radical Theory and Popular Politics. Oxford and New York: Berg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. In Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  15. Grossberg, Lawrence. 1992. We Gotta Get Out of this Place: Popular Conservatism and Popular Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Hall, Stuart, and Martin Jacques, eds. 1989. New Times: The Changing Face of Politics in the 1990s. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  17. Hindess, Barry, and Paul Hirst. 1977. Mode of Production and Social Formation: An Auto-Critique of Pre-Capitalist Modes of Production. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jameson, Fredric. 1991. Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Joseph, Jonathan. 2002. Hegemony: A Realist Analysis. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lacan, Jacques. 1977. Écrits: A Selection. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Laclau, Ernesto. 1977. Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 1990. New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1996. Why Do Empty Signifiers Matter to Politics? In Emancipation(s), 36–46. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2005. On Populist Reason. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  25. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 1990. Post-Marxism Without Apologies. In New Reflections on the Revolution of our Times, 97–132. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  27. Lapavitsas, Costas. 2013. Profiting Without Producing: How Finance Exploits Us All. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  28. Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. LiPuma, Edward, and Benjamin Lee. 2004. Financial Derivatives and the Globalization of Risk. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marazzi, Christian. 2008. Capital and Language: From the New Economy to the War Economy. Los Angeles, CA and Cambridge, MA: Semiotext(e); Distributed by the MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Meillassoux, Quentin. 2008. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Trans. Ray Brassier. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  32. Miliband, Ralph. 1985. The New Revisionism in Britain. New Left Review 150: 5–26.Google Scholar
  33. Mouffe, Chantal. 1979. Hegemony and Ideology in Gramsci. In Gramsci and Marxist Theory, ed. Chantal Mouffe, 168–204. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 1993. The Return of the Political. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  36. Murray, Robin. 1989. Fordism and post-Fordism. In New Times: The Changing Face of Politics in the 1990s, ed. Stuart Hall and Martin Jacques, 38–53. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  37. Osborne, Peter. 1991. Radicalism Without Limit? In Socialism and the Limits of Liberalism, 201–225. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  38. Perez, Edgar. 2011. The Speed Traders. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  39. Reich, Michael, David Gordon, and Richard Edwards. 1973. Dual Labour Markets: A Theory of Labor Market Segmentation. American Economic Review 62: 359–368.Google Scholar
  40. de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1983. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. Roy Harris. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  41. Tronti, Mario. 1964. Lenin in England. www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/it/tronti.htm.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication StudiesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations