Advertisement

Ideologies of Self-Organisation

  • Alex WilliamsEmail author
Chapter
  • 350 Downloads
Part of the International Political Theory book series (IPoT)

Abstract

The emergence of forms of order form the interactions of many individuals is a common interest of complexity theory, sociology, and political theory alike. This chapter examines two trajectories of thought in order to explore some of the political implications of social self-organisation. One strand is the proto-complexity thinking of the economist and social theorist Hayek, the other a sequence of anarchist thinkers of self-organisation. This chapter develops a critical reading of both these ideologies of self-organisation. It outlines a critique of Hayek as failing to pay proper attention to the mechanisms by which social systems coordinate themselves, in favour of the overarching catallaxy order which emerges. Conversely, anarchist-leaning thinkers of self-organisation tend to stress the consensuality of relations between human components over the order which they collectively form. Seeking to avoid such flaws, the author concludes that we need a kind of ‘really complex’ complexity that avoids the kind of misguided notions of ‘pure’ hierarchies and networks that bedevil many thinkers of self-organisation.

Keywords

Self-organisation Hayek Bookchin Networks Hierarchies 

References

  1. Adorno, Theodor, and Max Horkheimer. 1997. Dialectic of Enlightenment. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Barabási, Albert-László, and Réka Albert. 1999. Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science 286: 509–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berlin, Isaiah. 1958. Two Concepts of Liberty: An Inaugural Lecture Delivered Before the University of Oxford on 31 October 1958. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Best, Steven, and Douglas Kellner. 1999. Kevin Kelly’s Complexity Theory: The Politics and Ideology of Self-Organizing Systems. Organization & Environment 12: 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bookchin, Murray. 1982. The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy. Palo Alto, CA: Cheshire Books.Google Scholar
  6. Chesters, Graeme, and Ian Welsh. 2006. Complexity and Social Movements: Multitudes at the Edge of Chaos. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cudworth, Erika, and Steve Hobden. 2011. Posthuman International Relations: Complexity, Ecologism and Global Politics. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  8. Davies, Jonathan S. 2011. Challenging Governance Theory: From Networks to Hegemony. Bristol and Chicago, IL: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1972. Anti-Oedipus. Trans. Robert Hurley, Mark Seem, and Helen Lane. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1980. A Thousand Plateaus. Trans. Brian Massumi. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  11. Farrell, Henry, and Cosma Shalizi. 2012. Cognitive Democracy. Crooked Timber. http://crookedtimber.org/2012/05/23/cognitive-democracy/.
  12. Freeman, Jo. 1972. The Tyranny of Structurelessness. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 17: 151–165.Google Scholar
  13. Gaus, Gerald. 2006. The Evolution of Society and Mind: Hayek’s System of Ideas. In The Cambridge Companion to Hayek, 232–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gould, Stephen Jay. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gray, John. 1993. Beyond the New Right: Markets, Government and the Common Environment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 1998. Hayek on Liberty. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2007. Enlightenment’s Wake. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hayek, Friedrich. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 1962. The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 1964. The Theory of Complex Phenomena. In Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, ed. Michael Martin and Lee McIntyre. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Karatzogianni, Athina, and Andrew Robinson. 2010. Power, Resistance, and Conflict in the Contemporary World: Social Movements, Networks, and Hierarchies. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Kelly, Kevin. 1994. Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems, and the Economic World. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  24. Kropotkin, Petr Alekseevich. 1972. Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Land, Nick. 2011. In Fanged Noumena: Collected Writings 1987–2007, ed. Ray Brassier and Robin Mackay. Falmouth: Urbanomic.Google Scholar
  26. Landstreicher, Wolfi. 2004. Autonomous Self-Organization and Anarchist Intervention. Portland, OR: Venomous Butterfly Publications.Google Scholar
  27. McShea, Daniel W. 2001. The Hierarchical Structure of Organisms: A Scale and Documentation of a Trend in the Maximum. Paleobiology 27: 405–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mirowski, Philip, and Dieter Plehwe. 2009. The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mislove, Alan E. 2011. Online Social Networks: Measurement, Analysis, and Applications to Distributed Information Systems. [S.l.]: Proquest, Umi Dissertatio.Google Scholar
  30. Nunes, Rodrigo. 2005. Nothing Is What Democracy Looks Like: Openness, Horizontality and the Movement of Movements. In Shut Them Down, ed. David Harvie, 299–319. West Yorkshire: Dissent!Google Scholar
  31. Robin, Corey. 2013. The Hayek-Pinochet Connection: A Second Reply to My Critics. Crooked Timber. http://crookedtimber.org/2013/06/25/the-hayek-pinochet-connection-a-second-reply-to-my-critics/.
  32. Tainter, Joseph. 1988. The Collapse of Complex Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Zerzan, John. 1999. Against Civilization: Readings and Reflections. Eugene, OR: Uncivilized Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication StudiesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations