Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Political Theory ((IPoT))

  • 1108 Accesses

Abstract

How does power work in a world of ever-growing complexity? In this chapter the author introduces the argument that we can do so by introducing the concepts of complexity into the theory of hegemony. It introduces the idea of social complexity as providing a set of models and tools enabling order to be brought to bear upon complex social phenomena. It discusses the commonalities between the Gramscian tradition of hegemonic political theory and elements of complexity theory. Finally, it summarises the argument pursued in the rest of the book, the deployment of an original account of social complexity to rethink hegemony theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See for example the structurally inadequate discourse emerging around a surging ‘populism’ (Mudde and Rovira Kaltwasser 2014; Müller 2016).

References

  • Agnew, John, and Stuart Crobridge. 2002. Mastering Space: Hegemony, Territory and International Political Economy. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Perry. 1976. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review I: 5–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley-Murray, Jon. 2010. Posthegemony: Political Theory and Latin America. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, Norberto. 1979. Gramsci and the Conception of Civil Society. In Gramsci and Marxist Theory, ed. Chantal Mouffe, 21–47. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousquet, Antoine, and Simon Curtis. 2011. Beyond Models and Metaphors. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 24: 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, David. 1998. Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: An Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, Damien. 2014. The End of Laissez-Faire? On the Durability of Embedded Neoliberalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, Philip G. 2008. Embedding Neoliberalism: The Evolution of a Hegemonic Paradigm. The Journal of International Trade and Diplomacy 2: 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesters, Graeme, and Ian Welsh. 2006. Complexity and Social Movements: Multitudes at the Edge of Chaos. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, Paul. 1998. Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, William E. 2010. A World of Becoming. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The Fragility of Things: Self-Organising Processes, Neoliberal Fantasies, and Democratic Activism. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corning, Peter A. 2002. The Re-emergence of “Emergence”: A Venerable Concept in Search of a Theory. Complexity 7: 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, Colin. 2011. The Strange Non-death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudworth, Erika, and Steve Hobden. 2011. Posthuman International Relations: Complexity, Ecologism and Global Politics. London: Zed Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Jonathan S. 2011. Challenging Governance Theory: From Networks to Hegemony. Bristol and Chicago, IL: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Day, Richard J.F. 2005. Gramsci Is Dead: Anarchist Currents in the Newest Social Movements. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Jodi. 2013. Complexity as Capture—Neoliberalism and the Loop of Drive. New Formations 80: 138–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLanda, Manuel. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder-Vass, Dave. 2010. The Causal Power of Social Structures: Emergence, Structure and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gershenson, Carlos. 2012. Complexity and Information: Measuring Emergence, Self-organization, and Homeostasis at Multiple Scales. Complexity. Early View. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.21424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Jeremy. 2008. Anti-capitalism and Culture: Radical Theory and Popular Politics. Oxford and New York: Berg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. In Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Stuart. 1983. The Great Moving Right Show. In The Politics of Thatcherism, ed. Stuart Hall and Martin Jacques, 19–39. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich. 1962. The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1964. The Theory of Complex Phenomena. In Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, ed. Michael Martin and Lee McIntyre. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, Robert. 1997. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, Bob. 2007. State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, Jonathan. 2002. Hegemony: A Realist Analysis. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karatzogianni, Athina, and Andrew Robinson. 2010. Power, Resistance, and Conflict in the Contemporary World: Social Movements, Networks, and Hierarchies. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, Jean-Pierre. 2009. Complexity and the Financial Crisis presented at the Conference on “The Macroeconomy and Financial Systems in Normal Times and in Times of Stress,” June 8, Gouvieux-Chantilly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landstreicher, Wolfi. 2004. Autonomous Self-Organization and Anarchist Intervention. Portland, OR: Venomous Butterfly Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, Scott. 2007. Power After Hegemony Cultural Studies in Mutation? Theory, Culture & Society 24: 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. 1848. The Communist Manifesto. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, Philip. 2013. Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Melanie. 2009. Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, Edgar. 2006. Restricted Complexity, General Complexity. ArXiv e-print cs/0610049.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. On Complexity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2014. Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Robin. 1989. Fordism and Post-Fordism. In New Times: The Changing Face of Politics in the 1990s, ed. Stuart Hall and Martin Jacques, 38–53. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olssen, Mark. 2008. Foucault as Complexity Theorist: Overcoming the Problems of Classical Philosophical Analysis. Educational Philosophy and Theory 40: 96–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00406.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plehwe, Dieter. 2009. Introduction. In The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, ed. Philip Mirowski and Dieter Plehwe, 1–42. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plehwe, Dieter, and Bernhard Walpen. 2006. Between Network and Complex Organization: The Making of Neoliberal Knowledge and Hegemony. In Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global Critique, ed. Dieter Plehwe, Bernhard Walpen, and Gisela Neunhoffer, 27–50. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, Robert Keith. 2005. Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strand, Roger. 2007. Complexity, Ideology, and Governance. In Reframing Complexity: Perspectives from North and South, 195–217. Mansifeld, MA: ISCE Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoburn, Nicholas. 2007. Patterns of Production: Cultural Studies After Hegemony. Theory, Culture & Society 24: 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Peter. 2009. The Gramscian Moment: Philosophy, Hegemony and Marxism. Chicago, IL: Haymarket.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Urry, John. 2003. Global Complexity. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby, Sylvia. 2003. Complexity Theory, Globalisation, and Diversity presented at the Conference of the British Sociological Association, York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond. 1977. Marxism and Literature. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Williams .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Williams, A. (2020). Introduction. In: Political Hegemony and Social Complexity. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19795-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics