Skip to main content

‘Beauty Does Not Own Itself’: Coetzee’s Feminist Critique of Platonic and Kantian Aesthetics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reading Coetzee's Women
  • 271 Accesses

Abstract

J.M. Coetzee’s novels frequently comment on male preoccupation with female beauty that often leads to women’s disempowerment. Giles provides critical insight into Coetzee’s interrogation of Platonic ideas of love and Kantian disinterested aesthetics, inflected by Cervantes and Samuel Richardson, in her examination of three novels: Disgrace, Slow Man, and The Schooldays of Jesus. Arguing that Coetzee engages the question of whether a ‘male-writer-pornographer’ can represent power and desire ethically and philosophically, Giles observes that the novels exhibit a desire to take ownership, as a man, of male violence against women by examining the forces behind that violence. Reading Coetzee as performing a postcritical feminist critique of the traditional aesthetics that ignored sexual politics, she concludes that for Coetzee there is no disinterested aesthetic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Because Plato puts himself at two removes from Diotima’s arguments it is problematic to assert they are Plato’s own, however often they are treated as such.

  2. 2.

    The sublime, for Kant, goes a step further to actually realise this unification; see ‘Of Gods and Dogs’ (Giles, 2012). The grounding for this lies in a sensus communis or ‘common sense’ (Kant, 2001a, 5: 238) but Kant fails to answer the ‘everything is beautiful’ conundrum, that is, why every intuition doesn’t appear beautiful as a result of a common sense: there must be a third component for judging, but a third element could introduce contingency (Derrida, 1987: 35; Guyer, 1997: 285–287, 2009: 204). Kant does not assert that we do share judgements of beauty, but that we feel that we ought to share them (Kant, 2001a, 5: 211).

  3. 3.

    On rape and the foundation of nations in Disgrace, see Van Wyk Smith (2014); and Boehmer (2002: 349).

  4. 4.

    For this and other insights, I wish to thank the members of the Prato J.M. Coetzee Reading Group for their conversation: Patricia Álvarez, Michael Deckard, Lucy Graham, Agata Szczeszak-Brewer, and Aparna Tarc.

  5. 5.

    See Korsmeyer (2004, ch. 3); and Battersby (1989).

  6. 6.

    See May on the body’s resistance to metaphor and on postmodern dance and the body in Coetzee (2001: 404, 408, 410).

  7. 7.

    On dance as the art form forgotten by aesthetic theory, and its pan-cultural and evolutionary origins, see Sheets-Johnstone (2005).

Works Cited

  • Attridge, Derek. 2005. J. M. Coetzee and The Ethics of Reading: Literature in the Event. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battersby, Christine. 1989. Gender and Genius: Towards a Feminist Aesthetics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, John. 1972. Ways of Seeing. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehmer, Elleke. 2002. Not Saying Sorry, Not Speaking Pain: Gender Implications in Disgrace. Interventions 4 (3): 342–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervantes, Miguel de. 2004. Don Quixote. Gutenberg.org. http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/996. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.

  • Chaplin, Adrienne. 2005. Art and Embodiment: Biological and Phenomenological Contributions to Understanding Beauty and the Aesthetic. Contemporary Aesthetics, 3. http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=291. Accessed 10 Jan 2018.

  • Coetzee, John Maxwell. 1979. Surreal Metaphors and Random Processes. Journal of Literary Semantics 8 (3): 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. Confession and Double Thoughts: Tolstoy, Rousseau, Dostoevsky. Comparative Literature 37 (3): 193–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Giving Offense: Essays on Censorship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Stranger Shores: Literary Essays. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Disgrace. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Slow Man. London: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Diary of a Bad Year. London: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. An Interview with J.M. Coetzee. By Lawrence Rainey, David Atwell, and Benjamin Madden. Modernism/modernity 18 (4): 847–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. The Schooldays of Jesus. London: Harvill Secker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derksen, Rick. 2008. Etymological Dictionary of the Slavic Inherited Lexicon. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1987. The Truth in Painting. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Ian McLeod. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, Anne. 2013. What’s Wrong with the (Female) Nude? A Feminist Perspective on Art and Pornography. In Art and Pornography: Philosophical Essays, ed. Hans Maes and Jerrold Levenson, 277–308. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, Jana María. 2012. Of Gods and Dogs: The Post/Colonial Sublime in Coetzee’s Disgrace. In The Sublime Today, ed. Gillian Pierce, 13–48. Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Lucy Valerie. 2003. Reading the Unspeakable: Rape in J.M. Coetzee’s Disgrace. Journal of African Studies 29 (2): 433–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, Paul. 1997. Kant and the Claims of Taste. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. The Harmony of the Faculties in Recent Books. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67 (2): 201–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, N.G.L., and H.H. Scullard, eds. 1970. The Oxford Classical Dictionary. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, Patrick, ed. 2003. Dictionary of American Family Names. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewett, Ivan. 2014. Anna Magdalena Bach: A Forgotten Genius? The Telegraph, October 26. www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/classicalmusic/11188594/Anna-Magdalena-Bach-a-forgotten-genius.html. Accessed 10 Jan 2018.

  • Isserlis, Steven. 2014. Suite Scandal: Why Bach’s Wife Cannot Take Credit for His Cello Masterwork. The Guardian, October 29. https://www.theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2014/oct/29/why-bach-wife-cannot-take-credit-for-his-cello-masterwork. Accessed 10 Jan 2018.

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001a. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Rev. ed. Trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001b. Lectures on Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001c. Religion and Rational Theology. Rev. ed. Trans. Allen Wood and George di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Observations on the Feeling of the Sublime and the Beautiful. Trans. John T. Goldthwaite. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. In Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, ed. Robert Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, Adam. 2017. With Fear and Trembling: The Essential Protestantism of J. M. Coetzee’s Late Fiction. The Nation, June 19–26: 37–40. https://www.thenation.com/article/j-m-coetzees-essential-protestantism/. Accessed 10 Jan 2018.

  • Korsmeyer, Carolyn. 2004. Gender and Aesthetics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Feminist Aesthetics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, January 12. Ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/feminism-aesthetics/. Accessed 10 Jan 2018.

  • Kuenzli, Rudolf. 1991. Surrealism and Misogyny. In Surrealism and Women, ed. Mary Ann Caws, Rudolf E. Kuenzli, and Gloria Gwen Raebert. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lear, Jonathan. 2008. The Ethical Thought of J. M. Coetzee. Raritan 28 (1): 68–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddell and Scott. 1968. An Intermediate Greek Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, María J. 2013. Miguel De Cervantes and J. M. Coetzee: An Unacknowledged Paternity. Journal of Literary Studies 29 (4): 80–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardorossian, Carine M. 2011. Rape and the Violence of Representation in J.M. Coetzee’s Disgrace. Research in African Literatures 42 (2): 72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, Brian. 2001. J. M. Coetzee and the Question of the Body. Modern Fiction Studies 47 (2): 391–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 1961. In Collected Dialogues, ed. Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheman, Naomi. 1993. Thinking About Quality in Women’s Visual Art. In Engenderings: Constructions of Knowledge, Authority, and Privilege. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 2005. Man Has Always Danced: Forays into the Origins of an Art Largely Forgotten by Philosophers. Contemporary Aesthetics, 3. http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=273&searchstr=sheets-johnstone. Accessed 10 Jan 2018.

  • Van Wyk Smith, M. 2014. Rape and the Foundation of Nations in J. M. Coetzee’s Disgrace. English in Africa 41 (1): 13–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Janet. 2015. The Aesthetics of Uncertainty. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfflin, Heinrich. 1950. Principles of Art History. Trans. M. D. Hottinger. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfthal, Diane. 2000. Images of Rape: The Heroic Tradition and Its Alternatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jana M. Giles .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Giles, J.M. (2019). ‘Beauty Does Not Own Itself’: Coetzee’s Feminist Critique of Platonic and Kantian Aesthetics. In: Kossew, S., Harvey, M. (eds) Reading Coetzee's Women. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19777-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics