Abstract
This chapter explains the critique of mainstream economics from behavioural economics. Research by economists and psychologists shows that people are irrational in ways which violate the basic assumptions of economic theory. Humans use heuristics which lead to biases, and decisions can be influenced by framing effects. Such irrationality widens the scope for government intervention, particularly through libertarian paternalist policies which nudge people in the right direction without explicit coercion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
‘Linda is more likely to be a bank teller than she is to be a feminist bank teller, because every feminist bank teller is a bank teller, but some women bank tellers are not feminists, and Linda could be one of them’ (Tversky and Kahneman 1983: 299).
- 2.
We emphasize that our point here is not to equate moral warnings against homosexuality with health warnings against smoking or to accuse public health advocates of bigotry. Our point is simply that policies can be non-coercive but still very harmful. Another difference is that there is strong evidence that smoking has deleterious health effects, whereas no such evidence exists that homosexuality is harmful.
References
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2013). Behavioral economics and the retirement savings crisis. Science, 339, 1152–1153.
Blaszczynski, A., Parke, A., Harris, A., Parkes, J., & Rigbye, J. (2015). Facilitating player control in gambling. Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 8, 36–51.
Breman, A. (2011). Give more tomorrow: Two field experiments on altruism and intertemporal choice. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 1349–1357.
Caplan, B. (2007). The myth of the rational voter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chapman, S., & Freeman, B. (2008). Markers of the denormalisation of smoking and the tobacco industry. Tobacco Control, 17, 25–31.
Conly, S. (2013). Against autonomy: Justifying coercive paternalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cowen, T. (1991). Self-constraint versus self-liberation. Ethics, 101, 360–373.
Crampton, E. (2009). Public health and the new paternalism. Policy: A Journal of Public Policy and Ideas, 25, 36–40.
Crampton, E., Burgess, M., & Taylor, B. R. (2011). The cost of cost studies (Department of Economics and Finance Working Paper, No. 29). Christchurch: University of Canterbury.
Crampton, E., Burgess, M., & Taylor, B. R. (2012). What’s in a cost? Comparing economic and public health measures of alcohol’s social costs. New Zealand Medical Journal, 125, 66–73.
Downs, J. S., Wisdom, J., Wansink, B., & Loewenstein, G. (2013). Supplementing menu labeling with calorie recommendations to test for facilitation effects. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 1604–1609.
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2006). The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic: Why the adjustments are insufficient. Psychological Science, 17, 311–318.
Evans, J. S. (2007). Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgement. Hove: Psychology Press.
Friedman, M., & Savage, L. J. (1948). The utility analysis of choices involving risk. Journal of Political Economy, 56, 279–304.
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650–669.
Grether, D. M., & Plott, C. R. (1979). Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economic Review, 69, 623–638.
Halpern, D., & Sanders, M. (2016). Nudging by government: Progress, impact, and lessons learned. Behavioral Science and Policy, 2, 52–65.
Hanson, R. (2007). Paternalism is about bias: Overcoming bias. Blogpost. http://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/03/paternalism_is_.html.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193–206.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
Kiszko, K. M., Martinez, O. D., Abrams, C., & Elbel, B. (2014). The influence of calorie labeling on food orders and consumption: A review of the literature. Journal of Community Health, 39, 1248–1269.
Klick, J., & Mitchell, G. (2005). Government regulation of irrationality: Moral and cognitive hazards. Minnesota Law Review, 90, 1620–1663.
Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 443–478.
Le Grand, J. (2008). The giants of excess: A challenge to the nation’s health. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 171, 843–856.
Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 46–55.
Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1973). Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in Las Vegas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 16–20.
List, J. A. (2002). Preference reversals of a different kind: The ‘more is less’ phenomenon. American Economic Review, 92, 1636–1643.
Loewenstein, G. (2011). Confronting reality: Pitfalls of calorie posting. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 93, 679–680.
O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2006). Optimal sin taxes. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1825–1849.
Pennington, M. (2016). Paternalism, behavioural economics, irrationality and state failure. European Journal of Political Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885116647853.
Pommerehne, W. W., Schneider, F., & Zweifel, P. (1982). Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon: A reexamination. American Economic Review, 72, 569–574.
Reilly, R. J. (1982). Preference reversal: Further evidence and some suggested modifications in experimental design. American Economic Review, 72, 576–584.
Rintoul, A., & Thomas, A. (2017). Pre-commitment systems for electronic gambling machines: Preventing harm and improving consumer protection (AGRC Discussion Paper No. 9). Canberra: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Rizzo, M. J., & Whitman, D. G. (2009). Little brother is watching you: New paternalism on the slippery slopes. Arizona Law Review, 51, 685–739.
Schnellenbach, J., & Schubert, C. (2015). Behavioral political economy: A survey. European Journal of Political Economy, 40, 395–417.
Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1968). Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 1–18.
Stigler, G. J. (1961). The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, 69, 213–225.
Sugden, R. (2009). On nudging: A review of Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 16, 365–373.
Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Nudging: A very short guide. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 583–588.
Thaler, R. H., & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save more tomorrow™: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112, 164–187.
Thaler, R. H., & Shefrin, H. M. (1981). An economic theory of self-control. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 392–406.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293–315.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59, 251–278.
Whitman, G. (2006). Against the new paternalism. Policy Analysis, 563, 1–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dowding, K., Taylor, B.R. (2020). Irrationality and Public Policy. In: Economic Perspectives on Government. Foundations of Government and Public Administration. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19707-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19707-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19706-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19707-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)