Skip to main content

Entrepreneurial Intentions, Risk-Taking Propensity and Environmental Support: The Italian Experience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Anatomy of Entrepreneurial Decisions

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Abstract

Entrepreneurship is recognised as a powerful engine for employment and wealth for nations, to the point that, at the European level, institutions are, to date, particularly active in finding ways to stimulate young people’s entrepreneurial skills. In line with this, this chapter aims at analysing the entrepreneurial intention (EI) of students, testing the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) introduced by Ajzen in 1988 and expanding it by adding two ‘new’ variables, i.e. risk-taking propensity and perceived environmental support. In doing so, a questionnaire has been developed and the answers from a final sample of 383 Italian undergraduate students have been analysed.

Results support the entrepreneurial intention model: most hypotheses have been supported, and the explained variance is notably high. These results are interesting both for academics and policy-makers, pointing out the pivotal role of the environment to develop and foster the attitude towards entrepreneurship among students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Weighted average: 1 = highly insufficient, 9 = highly sufficient.

  2. 2.

    In particular, the outer loadings express the absolute contribution of each item to its assigned construct with their standardised value being higher than 0.7. The second indicator for the valuation of convergent validity of the measures is the average variance extracted (AVE), which is the degree to which a latent construct explains the variance of its items; here, the suggested threshold is 0.5. For the internal consistency, we report the composite reliability (CR) and the Cronbach’s alpha, whose values should be between 0.6 and 0.9 (a value of 0.7 is generally accepted). Lastly, to assess whether each construct is genuinely distinct from the others, we followed two approaches: the Fornell-Larcker criterion, which verifies that the square root of each construct’s AVE is higher than its correlations with all the remaining constructs, and the Heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT), which is indeed an estimation of what the actual correlation between two constructs would be, if they were perfectly reliable (its value should be lower than 0.9).

  3. 3.

    Bootstrapping is a resampling technique used to compute standard errors of coefficients and assess their significance without relying on distributional assumptions (i.e. multi-normality of data). Here 5000 sub-samples are calculated.

  4. 4.

    A shared rule is that the VIF should be lower than 5 (or 10 if a more liberal approach is adopted).

  5. 5.

    For the variable AGE, a group was created following a dichotomous categorisation of students born before 1997 or from this year forth. For the statistical comparison, each subsample was balanced with its counterpart by using a weighting vector.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Cliff, J. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 573–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alferaih, A. (2017). Weight- and meta-analysis of empirical literature on entrepreneurship: Towards a conceptualization of Entrepreneurial intention and behaviour. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 18, 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (2012). Determinants of high-growth entrepreneurship. OECD/DBA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Keeley, R. H., Klofsten, M., Parker, G. G. C., & Hay, M. (2001). Entrepreneurial intent among students in Scandinavia and in the USA. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 2, 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Keeley, R. H., Klofsten, M., & Ulfstedt, T. (1997). Entrepreneurial intent among students: Testing an intent model in Asia, Scandinavia and USA. In P. D. Reynolds (Ed.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacq, S., Ofstein, L. F., Kickul, J. R., & Gundry, L. K. (2017). Perceived entrepreneurial munificence and entrepreneurial intentions: A social cognitive perspective. International Small Business Journal, 35, 639–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa, S. D., Kickul, J., & Liao-Troth, M. (2007). Development and validation of a multidimensional scale of entrepreneurial risk perception. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2007(1), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modelling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begley, T. M., & Boyd, D. P. (1987). A comparison of entrepreneurs and managers of small business firms. Journal of Management, 13, 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begley, T. M., Tan, W. L., Larasati, A. B., Rab, A., Zamora, E., & Nanayakkara, G. (1997). The relationship between socio-cultural dimensions and interest in starting a business: A multi-country study (Vol. 17). Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S. (2007). Entrepreneurial culture, regional innovativeness and economic growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17, 187–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, B. (2015). Entrepreneurial intentions research: A review and outlook. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 13, 143–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov, C., & Foss, N. J. (2016). Institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: What do we know and what do we still need to know? Academy of Management Perspectives, 30, 292–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, N., Content, J., Sanders, M., & Stam, E. (2018). Institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth in Europe. Small Business Economics, 51, 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockhaus, R. H. (1980). Risk-taking propensity of entrepreneurs. The Academy of Management Journal, 23, 509–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cafferata, R., & Dossena, G. (Eds.). (2012). Spirito imprenditoriale e formazione d’impresa: I risultati di un’indagine empirica nazionale. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Braunerhjelm, P. (2009). Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: A historical review. Industrial & Corporate Change, 18, 1193–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Casero, J. C., Ferreira, J. J. M., Mogollon, R. H., & Raposo, M. L. B. (2012). Influence of institutional environment on entrepreneurial intention: A comparative study of two countries university students. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8, 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, E. J. (2013). Reconstructing entrepreneurial intentions to identify predisposition for growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 633–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, E. J., & Shepherd, D. A. (2002). Self-Employment as a career choice: Attitudes, entrepreneurial intentions, and utility maximization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26, 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32, 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer. (2012). Entrepreneurship in the EU and beyond. Survey co-ordinated by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer. (2014). European youth in 2014 analytical synthesis. Survey co-ordinated by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2018). https://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes_it

  • European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2016). Entrepreneurship education at school in Europe. Eurydice report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayolle, A., & Liñán, F. (2014). The future of research on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Research, 67, 663–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., & Lüthje, C. (2004). Entrepreneurial intentions of business students — A benchmarking study. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 1, 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2014). Global report. Babson Park, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2017/2018). Global report. Babson Park, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnyawali, D. R., & Fogel, D. S. (1994). Environments for entrepreneurship development: Key dimensions and research implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18, 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, J., Hu, L., Wu, J., & Lado, A. A. (2018). Risk propensity, self-regulation, and entrepreneurial intention: Empirical evidence from China. Current Psychology, 37, 648–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (Eds.). (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, C., & Treanor, L. (2013). Where to now? New directions in supporting new venture creation. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20, 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, A., & Liñán, F. (2013). Testing alternative measures of subjective norms in entrepreneurial intention models. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 19, 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INSEAD. (2018). The global talent competitiveness index 2018, Fontainebleau, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, J. E., & Brush, C. G. (2013). Research on women entrepreneurs: Challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature? The Academy of Management Annals, 7, 663–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kautonen, T., Van Gelderen, M., & Fink, M. (2015). Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 655–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, A., & Frank, H. (2009). Nascent entrepreneurship in a longitudinal perspective: The impact of person, environment, resources and the founding process on the decision to start business activities. International Small Business Journal, 27, 720–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolvereid, L. (1996). Prediction of employment status choice intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21, 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., & Carsrud, A. L. (1993). Entrepreneurial intentions: Applying the theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 5, 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L., Wong, P. K., Foo, M. D., & Leung, A. (2011). Entrepreneurial intentions: The influence of organizational and individual factors. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 124–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 593–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liñán, F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: Citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11, 907–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, J., & Castogiovanni, G. (2015). The theory of planned behavior in entrepreneurship research: What we know and future directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11, 935–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüthje, C., & Franke, N. (2003). The ‘making’ of an entrepreneur: Testing a model of entrepreneurial intent among engineering students at MIT. R & D Management, 33, 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mari, M., Poggesi, S., & De Vita, L. (2016). Family embeddedness and business performance: Evidences from women-owned firms. Management Decision, 54, 476–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1848). Principles of political economy with some of their applications to social philosophy. London: John W. Parker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriano, J. A., Gorgievski, M., Laguna, M., Stephan, U., & Zarafshani, K. (2011). A cross-cultural approach to understanding entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Career Development, 39, 162–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neira, I., Calvo, N., Fernandez, L., & Portela, M. (2017). Entrepreneur: Do social capital and culture matter? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13, 665–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2016. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017). Enhancing the contributions of SMEs in a global and digitalised Economy. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD/European Union. (2012). Policy brief on youth entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial activities in Europe. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD/European Union. (2017). The missing entrepreneurs 2017: Policies for inclusive entrepreneurship. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostapenko, N. (2017). Do informal institutions affect entrepreneurial intentions? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24, 446–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, S., & Jones, R. (2011). Business support for new technology based firms: A study of entrepreneurs in North Wales. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 17, 645–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passoni, D., & Glavam, R. B. (2018). Entrepreneurial intention and the effects of entrepreneurial education: Differences among management, engineering, and accounting students. International Journal of Innovation Science, 10, 92–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poggesi, S., Mari, M., & De Vita, L. (2015). Family and work-life balance mechanisms: What is their impact on the performance of Italian female service firms? The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 16, 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poh Kam, W., Yuen Ping, H., & Erkko, A. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24, 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. B., Stimpson, D. V., Huefner, J. C., & Hunt, H. K. (1991). An attitude approach to the prediction of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15, 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2011). Multi-group analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. Advances in International Marketing, 22, 195–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scafarto, F., & Balzano, S. (2012). The role and determinants of entrepreneurial intention at university level: Theoretical issues and new empirical evidence from Italy. Milano: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scafarto, F., Cerruti, C., Binci, D., Ozeren, E., & Duygulu, E. (2017). Entrepreneurial intentions and cultural orientations. An exploratory analysis in Italian and Turkish universities. In M. H. Bilgin, H. Danis, E. Demir, & U. Can (Eds.), Regional studies on economic growth, financial economics and management. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaegel, C., & Koenig, M. (2014). Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: A meta-analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 291–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, E. J., Wdowiak, M. A., Almer-Jarz, D. A., & Breitenecker, R. J. (2009). The effects of attitudes and perceived environment conditions on students’ entrepreneurial intent: An Austrian perspective. Education + Training, 51, 272–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). The social dimension of entrepreneurship. In C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of entrepreneurship. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinnar, R. S., Hsu, D. K., Powell, B. C., & Zhou, H. B. (2018). Entrepreneurial intentions and start-ups: Are women or men more likely to enact their intentions? International Small Business Journal-Researching Entrepreneurship, 36, 60–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2017). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12, 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, S. J., Casteleiro, C. M. L., Rodrigues, R. G., & Guerra, M. D. (2018). Entrepreneurial intentions and entrepreneurship in European countries. International Journal of Innovation Science, 10, 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. R. (2009). Individual entrepreneurial intent: Construct clarification and development of an internationally reliable metric. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 669–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tkachev, A., & Kolvereid, L. (1999). Self-employment intentions among russian students. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 11, 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, K. H., Chang, H. C., & Peng, C. Y. (2016). Refining the linkage between perceived capability and entrepreneurial intention: Roles of perceived opportunity, fear of failure, and gender. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12, 1127–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turker, D., & Sonmez Selcuk, S. (2009). Which factors affect entrepreneurial intention of university students? Journal of European Industrial Training, 33, 142–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, B., & Kujinga, L. (2017). The institutional environment and social entrepreneurship intentions. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 23, 638–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valliere, D., & Peterson, R. (2009). Entrepreneurship and economic growth: evidence from emerging and developed countries. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 21, 459–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2005). The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, D. H., Memili, E., Kaciak, E., & Ochi, M. (2014). Japanese women entrepreneurs: Implications for family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 52, 286–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13, 27–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wold, H. O. (1980). Model construction and evaluation when theoretical knowledge is scarce: Theory and application of PLS. In J. Kmenta & J. B. Ramsey (Eds.), Evaluation of econometric models. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (1999). The changing rules of global competitiveness in the 21st century. Academy of Management Perspectives, 13, 36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2010). The relationship of personality to entrepreneurial intentions and performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36, 381–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Scafarto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Scafarto, F., Poggesi, S., Mari, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial Intentions, Risk-Taking Propensity and Environmental Support: The Italian Experience. In: Caputo, A., Pellegrini, M.M. (eds) The Anatomy of Entrepreneurial Decisions. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19685-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics