Abstract
Researchers and managers need to better understand how different ideas of ethics shape how artificial intelligence can be effectively applied and leveraged as a source of competitive advantage. More fundamentally, managers need to understand how the competitive use of artificial intelligence cannot be differentiated from the specific ethical claims reflected in the design, operation, management, and maintenance of the technology. We pose how AI can be given dimensions to provide better insight into ethical requirements. We pose, however, that there is no ethical panacea, rather that the effective global management of ethical and unethical AI requires a larger common meta-ethical approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Grossman (2018).
- 2.
Esposito et al. (Forthcoming).
- 3.
See Dewey et al. (2012).
- 4.
See for inspiration, as the specific concept of relevant in relation to moral propositions derives from Matheis’s work (2016).
- 5.
However, within the field, there is a divide between those who believe the current set of solution and problems genuinely constitute AI or whether such neural networks, or any other similar solution (machine learning, deep learning, etc.) is simply imitation.
- 6.
“Deep Learning beyond Cats and Dogs: Recent Advances in …”. Accessed 2019. http://www.cs.ucf.edu/~bagci/publications/catsdogs.pdf.
- 7.
Managers should learn to discriminate between systems that learn how to perform a specific task, and system that can learn “how to learn” how to perform that or other tasks.
- 8.
Garcia (2018).
- 9.
Goldhill and Goldhill (2018).
- 10.
Katwala (2018).
- 11.
The intercept (2019).
- 12.
Day (2018).
- 13.
“Does Predictive Policing Work?—Instituto Igarapé.” Igarape.org.br. https://igarape.org.br/does-predictive-policing-work/.
- 14.
For inspiration, see Scott (2008). The issue is identified in relation to government organization of forestation in strict rows by virtue of state defined reasons.
- 15.
Esposito et al. (Forthcoming).
- 16.
Ibid.
- 17.
Esposito et al. (Forthcoming)
References
Day, M. (2018). Amazon officials pitched their facial recognition software to ICE. The Seattle Times, October 23, 2018. Accessed 2019. https://www.seattletimes.com/business/amazon/amazon-officials-pitched-their-facial-recognition-software-to-ice/.
Dewey, J., Deen, P., & Hickman, L. A. (2012). Unmodern philosophy and modern philosophy. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Esposito, M., Tse, T., Entsminger, J., & Jean, A. (Forthcoming). Why algorithmic accountability is a problem for everyone. Project Syndicate (2019).
Garcia, S. E. (2018). Ex-content moderator Sues Facebook, saying violent images caused her PTSD. The New York Times, September 25, 2018. Accessed March 30, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/25/technology/facebook-moderator-job-ptsd-lawsuit.html.
Goldhill, O., & Goldhill, O. (2018). Philosophers are building ethical algorithms to help control self-driving cars. Quartz, February 11, 2018. Accessed March 30, 2019. https://qz.com/1204395/self-driving-cars-trolley-problem-philosophers-are-building-ethical-algorithms-to-solve-the-problem/.
Grossman, D. (2018). ‘Trolley problem’ survey reveals society’s unwritten rules about who self-driving cars can kill. Popular Mechanics, October 25, 2018. Accessed March 30, 2019. https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/infrastructure/a24222017/trolley-problem-self-driving-cars/.
Katwala, A. (2018). How to make algorithms fair when you don’t know what they’re doing. WIRED, December 11, 2018. Accessed March 30, 2019. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/ai-bias-black-box-sandra-wachter.
Matheis, C. (2016). Refuge and refusal: Credibility assessment, status determination and making it feasible for refugees to say “no”. Migration Policy and Practice, 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137503817_2.
The Intercept. (2019). Google hedges on promise to end controversial involvement in military drone contract. The Intercept, March 01, 2019. Accessed 2019. https://theintercept.com/2019/03/01/google-project-maven-contract/.
Scott, J. C. (2008). Seeing like a state how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Esposito, M., Entsminger, J., Xiong, L. (2020). A Manager’s Introduction to AI Ethics. In: Pfeffermann, N. (eds) New Leadership in Strategy and Communication. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19681-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19681-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19680-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19681-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)