Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Skin Elements Ltd—The Importance of Knowledge Management in Commercialisation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Leadership in Strategy and Communication

Abstract

This Chapter examines the case of Skin Elements Ltd., a Biotech start-up enterprise that successfully created, manufactured and commercialised an innovative skincare technology into a global market. The principal focus of this case study is on the role played by knowledge management and how this shaped the innovation strategy that saw the technology successfully commercialised and positioned within the global natural skin care market. The chapter examines the process of commercialisation, and demonstrates how knowledge management (KM), open innovation (OI), absorptive capacity (ACAP), and entrepreneurial operations management (EOM) played key roles in evolving the innovation strategy and commercialisation process. The chapter opens with an overview of the case study before introducing the concepts described above, and then enfolding the academic literature into the case to illustrate the relationships found. It then draws conclusions from the findings and lessons for research, policy and practice. The case draws from the personal experience of the lead author, who has provided first hand observations of the company’s foundation and evolution over its first 12 years of operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abetti, P. A., Lemaistre, C. W., & Wacholder, M. H. (1988). The role of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: Technopolis development in a mature industrial area. In R. W. Smilor, G. Kozmetsky, & D. V. Gibson (Eds.), Creating the Technopolis (pp. 125–144). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgun, A. E., Lynn, G. S., & Byrne, J. C. (2004). Taking the guess work out of new product development: How successful high-tech companies get that way. Journal of Business Strategy, 25(4), 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alegre, J., Sengupta, K., & Lapiedra, R. (2013). Knowledge management and innovation performance in a high-tech SMEs industry. International Small Business Journal, 31(4), 454–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athaide, G. A., Meyers, P. W., & Wilemon, D. L. (1996). Seller-buyer interactions during the commercialisation of technological process innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(5), 406–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., & Klofsten, M. (1998). A comparative study of two European business incubators. Journal of Small Business Management, 36(1), 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagshaw, M. (2000). Why knowledge management is here to stay. Industrial and Commercial Training, 32(5), 179–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, S., & Dorf, B. (2012). The start-up owner’s manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company. Pescadero, CA: K&S Ranch Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougrain, F., & Haudeville, B. (2002). Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities. Research Policy, 31(5), 735–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Meissner, D. (2017). Glocal targeted open innovation: Challenges, opportunities and implications for theory, policy and practice. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 236–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerchione, R., Esposito, E., & Spadaro, M. (2016). A literature review on knowledge management in SMEs. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 14(2), 169–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravorti, B. (2004). The new rules for bringing innovations to market. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Lehaney, B. (2006). Toward understanding inter-organizational knowledge transfer needs in SMEs: Insight from a UK investigation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(3), 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In: H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, J. West (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civi, E. (2000). Knowledge management as a competitive asset: A review. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 18(4), 166–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G. (2019). The drivers of success in new-product development. Industrial Marketing Management, 76(1), 36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G., & Edgett, S. J. (2005). Lean, rapid and profitable new product development. Canada: Product Development Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1993). Screening new products for potential winners. Long Range Planning, 26(6), 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1995). Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(5), 374–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., Steffans, P., & Fitzsimmons, J. (2009). Growing profitable or growing from profits: Putting the horse in front of the cart? Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 388–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Zubielqui, G. C., Lindsay, N., & O’Connor, A. (2014). How product, operations, and marketing sources of ideas influence innovation and entrepreneurial performance in Australian SMEs. International Journal of Innovation Management, 18(2), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimov, D. (2007). From opportunity insight to opportunity intention: The importance of person-situation learning match. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(4), 561–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Do, T. H., Mazzarol, T., Soutar, G. N., Volery, T., & Reboud, S. (2018). Organisational factors, anticipated rents and commercialisation in SMEs. International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(2), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, M. (2000). The management of technological innovation. An international and strategic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durst, S., & Edvardsson, I. R. (2012). Knowledge management in SMEs: A literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(6), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson, I. R. (2009). Is knowledge management losing ground? Developments among Icelandic SMEs. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 7(1), 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (2002). Success factors of new product development: A review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(1), 1–40.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista, P., Esposito, E., Lauro, V., & Raffa, M. (2010). The adoption of knowledge management systems in small firms. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(1), 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, M., & Prashantham, S. (2011). Knowledge assimilation processes of rapidly internationalising firms. Longitudinal case studies of Scottish SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18(3), 475–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D., & Saren, M. (2001). Managing and marketing technology. London: Cengage Learning Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambardella, A., & Panico, C. (2014). On the management of open innovation. Research Policy, 43(5), 903–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, H., Von Krogh, G., & Spaeth, S. (2013). How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(9), 1134–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. (2006). Absorptive capacity, knowledge management and innovation in entrepreneurial small firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 12(6), 345–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., & Livio, C. (2016). An analysis of the open innovation effect on firm performance. European Management Journal, 34(5), 501–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. J. (2008). Developing a collaborative learning environment through technology enhanced education (TE3) support. Education + Training, 50(8/9), 674–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, G. (1994). A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heydebreck, P., Klofsten, M., & Maier, J. (2000). Innovation support for new technology-based firms: The Swedish Teknolopol approach. R&D Management, 30(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, K., Parejo, M., Bessant, J., & Perren, L. (1998). Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: A literature review. Technovation, 18(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M. (2015). A review of literature on open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 5(1), 1–12.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, F., & Rice, J. (2009). The role of absorptive capacity in facilitating “open innovation” outcomes: A study of Australian SMEs in the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., Soutar, G. N., & Brown, A. (2002). New product development processes in small to medium-sized enterprises: Some Australian evidence. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(1), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, V., & Quintas, P. (2008). Do SMEs do knowledge management? Or simply manage what they know? International Small Business Journal, 26(2), 131–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, V. K. (1997). Commercializing new technologies: Getting from mind to market. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J., Gwon, S. H., Kim, S., & Cho, K. (2013). Determinants of successful technology commercialization: Implication for Korean government-sponsored SMEs. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21(1), 72–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, D. J., & Rice, M. P. (2002). Advantage beyond founding the strategic use of technologies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(1), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keogh, W., Mulvie, A., & Cooper, S. (2005). The identification and application of knowledge capital within small firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(1), 76–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klofsten, M., & Jones-Evans, D. (1996). Stimulation of technology-based small firms—A case study of university-industry cooperation. Technovation, 16(4), 187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koen, P. A., Ajamian, G. M., Boyce, S., Clamen, A., Fisher, E., Fountoulakis, S., et al. (2002). Fuzzy front end: Effective methods, tools and techniques. In P. Belliveau, A. Griffin, & S. Somermeyer (Eds.), The PDMA toolbook 1 for new product development (Chapter 1). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, M., Loebbecke, C., & Powell, P. (2003). SMEs, co-opetition and knowledge sharing: The role of information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malecki, E. J. (1997). Technology and economic development: The dynamics of local, regional and national competitiveness (2nd ed.). Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, P., Mazzarol, T., & Reboud, S. (2015). Understanding commercialization in entrepreneurial firms: A case example. In International Council of Small Business (ICSB) 60th Annual Conference 2015, 6–9 June, Dubai, UAE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzarol, T., Clark, D., Gough, N, Olson, P., & Reboud, S. (2014). Commercialisation in SMEs: Case studies from Australia, New Zealand and the United States. In B. Kotey, T. Mazzarol, D. Clark, D. Foley, & T. McKeown (Eds.), Meeting the globalisation challenge: Smart and innovative SMEs in a globally competitive environment. Melbourne: Tilde University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J. (2001). Marketing of high-technology products and innovations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, I. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, M. B., Annansingh, F., Eaglestone, B., & Wakefield, R. (2006). Knowledge management issues in knowledge-intensive SMEs. Journal of Documentation, 62(1), 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2006). The SME financing gap: Theory and evidence (Vol. 1). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. www.oecd.org/bookshop.

  • OECD. (2010). High-growth enterprises: What governments can do to make a difference. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). Financing SMEs and entrepreneurs 2016: An OECD scoreboard. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2018). Promoting innovation in established SMEs. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). www.oecd.org.

  • Ozer, M. (2003). Process implications of the use of the internet in new product development: A conceptual analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(6), 517–530.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, M. (2004). Managing the selection process for new product ideas. Research Technology Management, 47(4), 10–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padula, G., Novelli, E., & Conti, R. (2015). SMEs inventive performance and profitability in the markets for technology. Technovation, 41–42(2015), 38–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parida, V., Oghazi, P., & Ericson, Å. (2014). Realization of open innovation: A case study in the manufacturing industry. Journal of Promotion Management, 20(3), 372–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parida, V., Westerberg, M., & Frishammar, J. L. (2012). Inbound open innovation activities in high-tech SMEs: The impact on innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 283–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, T., & Ryu, D. (2015). Drivers of technology commercialization and performance in SMEs. Management Decision, 53(2), 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellikka, J., & Lauronen, J. (2007). Fostering commercialization of innovation in small high technology firms. International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, 1(1), 92–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellikka, J., & Virtanen, M. (2009). Problems of commercialisation in small technology-based firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 9(3), 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Araos, A., Barber, K. D., Munive-Hernandez, J. E., & Eldridge, S. (2007). Designing a knowledge management tool to support knowledge sharing networks. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 18(2), 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillania, R. K. (2008). Strategic issues in knowledge management in small and medium enterprises. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 6(4), 334–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillania, R. K. (2009). Demystifying knowledge management. Business Strategy Series, 10(2), 96–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post critical philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radzevicience, D. (2008). Developing small and medium enterprises using knowledge management frameworks. Aslib Proceedings, 60(6), 672–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ries, E. (2011). The lean start-up: How constant innovation creates radically successful businesses. London: Portfolio Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salojärvi, S., Furu, P., & Sveiby, K.-E. (2005). Knowledge management and growth in Finnish SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(2), 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedighadell, S., & Kachquie, R. (2013). Managerial factors influencing success of new product development. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(5), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, R. (2001). Helping a small business owner to share knowledge. Human Resource Development International, 4(4), 429–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D., & Patzelt, H. (2017). Trailblazing in entrepreneurship: Creating new paths for understanding the field. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, J. (2001). Knowledge management in small firms. Knowledge and Process Management, 8(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, J. (2005). Classification of different knowledge management development approaches of SMEs. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 3(3), 136–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theyel, N. (2013). Extending open innovation throughout the value chain by small and medium-sized manufacturers. International Small Business Journal, 31(3), 256–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Vrande, V., de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & de Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6), 423–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hemert, P., Nijkamp, P., & Masurel, E. (2013). From innovation to commercialization through networks and agglomerations: Analysis of sources of innovation, innovation capabilities and performance of Dutch SMEs. The Annals of Regional Science, 50(2), 425–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open innovation: The next decade. Research Policy, 43(5), 805–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. L., & Bukowitz, W. R. (2001). The Yin and Yang of intellectual capital management: The impact of ownership on realizing value from intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(2), 96–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. Y., & Aspinwall, E. (2004a). Characterizing knowledge management in the small business environment. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(3), 44–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. Y., & Aspinwall, E. (2004b). Knowledge management implementation frameworks: A review. Knowledge and Process Management, 11(2), 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. Y., & Aspinwall, E. (2005). An empirical study of the important factors for knowledge-management adoption in the SME sector. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 64–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. Y., & Aspinwall, E. (2006). Development of a knowledge management initiative and system: A case study. Expert Systems with Applications, 30(4), 633–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynarczyk, P., Piperopoulos, P., & Mcadam, M. (2013). Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: An overview. International Small Business Journal, 31(3), 240–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yahaya, S.-Y., & Nooh, A.-B. (2007). New product development management issues and decision-making approaches. Management Decision, 45(7), 1123–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yencken, J., & Gillin, M. (2006). A longitudinal comparative study of university research commercialisation performance: Australia, UK and USA. Innovation, 8(3), 214–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York, J., & Danes, J. (2014). Customer development, innovation and decision-making biases in the lean start-up. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 24(2), 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, re-conceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziamou, P. L. (2002). Commercializing new technologies: Consumers’ response to a new interface. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(5), 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UWA Business School, University of Western Australia, M263, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia

    Peter Malone & Tim Mazzarol

  2. Burgundy School of Business, 29 Rue Sambin, 21000, Dijon, France

    Tim Mazzarol & Sophie Reboud

Authors
  1. Peter Malone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tim Mazzarol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sophie Reboud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Mazzarol .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Paris, France

    Nicole Pfeffermann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Malone, P., Mazzarol, T., Reboud, S. (2020). Skin Elements Ltd—The Importance of Knowledge Management in Commercialisation. In: Pfeffermann, N. (eds) New Leadership in Strategy and Communication. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19681-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19681-3_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19680-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19681-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation