Skip to main content

When Clustering the Multiscalar Fingerprint of the City Reveals Its Segregation Patterns

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Self-Organizing Maps, Learning Vector Quantization, Clustering and Data Visualization (WSOM 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 976))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 804 Accesses

Abstract

The complexity of urban segregation challenges researchers to develop powerful and complex mathematical tools for assessing it. With more and more fine-grained and massive data becoming available these last years, individual-based models are now made possible in practice. Very recently, a mathematical object called multiscalar fingerprint [1], containing all possible and all scale individual trajectories in a city, was introduced. Here, we use clustering combined with specific measures for assessing features contributions to clusters, to explore this complex object and to single out hotspots of segregation. We illustrate how clustering allows to see where, how and to which extent segregation occurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Randon-Furling J, Olteanu M, Lucquiaud A (2018) From urban segregation to spatial structure detection. Urban Analytics and City Science, Environment and Planning B

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reardon SF, Firebaugh G (2002) Measures of multigroup segregation. Sociol Methodol 32(1):33–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kramer MR, Cooper HL, Drews-Botsch CD, Waller LA, Hogue CR (2010) Do measures matter? comparing surface-density-derived and census-tract-derived measures of racial residential segregation. Int J Health Geogr 9(1):29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hong S, O’Sullivan D, Sadahiro Y (2014) Implementing spatial segregation measures in R. PLOS ONE 9:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  5. Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable areal unit problem. University of East Anglia

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reardon SF, Matthews SA, O’Sullivan D, Lee BA, Firebaugh G, Farrell CR, Bischoff K (2008) The geographic scale of metropolitan racial segregation. Demography 45(3):489–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark WAV, Andersson E, Östh J, Malmberg B (2015) A multiscalar analysis of neighborhood composition in Los Angeles, 2000–2010: a location-based approach to segregation and diversity. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 105(6):1260–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Spielman SE, Logan JR (2013) Using high-resolution population data to identify neighborhoods and establish their boundaries. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 103(1):67–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fowler C (2016) Segregation as a multiscalar phenomenon and its implications for neighborhood-scale research: the case of south seattle 1990–2010. Urban Geogr 37(1):1–25

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Olteanu M, Randon-Furling J, Clark W (2019, to appear) Spatial analysis in high resolution geo-data. In: ESANN Proceedings. Preprint available on demand

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lamirel J-C, Dugue N, Cuxac P (2016) New efficient clustering quality indexes. In: International joint conference on neural networks, pp 3649–3657

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lamirel J-C, Mall R, Cuxac P, Safi G (2011) Variations to incremental growing neural gas algorithm based on label maximization. In: International joint conference on neural networks, pp 956–965

    Google Scholar 

  13. James M (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, vol 1, pp 281–297

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fritzke B (1995) A growing neural gas network learns topologies. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 625–632

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank W. Clark (UCLA) and J. Randon-Furling (Université Panthéon Sorbonne) for the many discussions on the topics of spatial segregation and individual trajectories analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madalina Olteanu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Olteanu, M., Lamirel, JC. (2020). When Clustering the Multiscalar Fingerprint of the City Reveals Its Segregation Patterns. In: Vellido, A., Gibert, K., Angulo, C., Martín Guerrero, J. (eds) Advances in Self-Organizing Maps, Learning Vector Quantization, Clustering and Data Visualization. WSOM 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 976. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19642-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics