Abstract
This short essay outlines a framework for adopting a resilient approach to the management of secondary school infrastructures, bearing in mind that identifying resilient features and actions of infrastructure in educational establishments is a path which has only recently been embarked upon and that currently there are only a few theoretical and practical references available. This framework has been developed on the basis of both theoretical references and resilient general strategies, as well as the numerous and widely disseminated good practices that have been mainly carried out in Italian schools. Although the latter are often characterized by partial responses to problems instead of systemic and integrated solutions that distinguish resilient approaches, they provide a framework of feasible solutions that can be used to outline the capabilities and possibilities of intervention. The article, first of all, outlines the functions that an evolutionary resilient approach, geared towards achieving sustainable school infrastructures and able to capture the opportunities of development and improvement from their problems and critical situations, can have in their management. Second, it describes the main intervention criteria that should characterize this kind of resilient approach. In this regard, two aspects are explored. The first one is the capacity of the school to be able to integrate socially and functionally with the neighbourhood, succeeding in becoming a point of reference in dealing with social- and educational-critical situations and a stimulus to seize the opportunities for cultural and educational development embedded in the dynamics of change. The second one is the capacity to develop stable subsidiary management of the school infrastructures and the important role of effective planning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A criterion to evaluate the systemic efficiency is inspired by the second law of thermodynamics, so that the quantities and means of using resources (energies, materials, humans, organizational, …) consumed to achieve a specific goal, must be those considered the most suitable at the time and place (Commoner, 1971). As, in reality, efficiency of this nature is always very rare, in the order of a few percentage points, there is a huge opportunity to explore and develop innovative solutions to increase not only the overall efficiency, but also a part of it.
- 2.
By school community we mean all the subjects, such as teachers, school staff, pupils, parents and individuals, groups or associations of citizens, who are interested in making a contribution towards the improvement of the functioning of a school. By neighbourhood communities we mean the set of subjects, made up of individuals, groups or associations of citizens, institutions, companies and workers, who live, use or otherwise share the infrastructures and services of a neighbourhood. The components of the school community also belong to the neighbourhood community, even if the former have dual interests with respect to the use of school infrastructures (Magoni, 2017b).
References
Angelucci, F., Di Sivo, M., & Ladiana, D. (2011). La scuola oltre la scuola. La gestione degli spazi scolastici tra rigenerazione e condivisione delle risorse, TECHNE, 06, 141–148.
Aprile, M. (2010). Comunità /quartiere. La trasposizione dell’idea comunitaria nel progetto dell’abitare, Franco Angeli, Milano.
Commoner, B. (1971). The closing circle: Nature, man, and technology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Davoudi, S., Brooks, E., & Mehmood, A. (2013). Evolutionary resilience and strategies for climate adaptation. Planning Practice & Research, 28(3), 307–322. Taylor & Francis online.
Elmqvist, T., Barnett, G., & Wilkinson, C. (2014). Exploring urban sustainability and resilience. In Resilient sustainable cities (pp. 19–28). Routledge in Association with GSE Research.
Grin, J., Rotmans, J., Schot, D. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change, Routledge studies in sustainability transitions. New York/London: Routledge.
Hertzberger, H. (2008). Space and learning: Lessons in architecture 3. Rotterdam NL: 010 Publisher.
Magoni, M. (2017a). Resilience thinking and urban metabolism in spatial planning: Which possible integrations, in city, territory and architecture on line. Springer, Published, December 23, 2017.
Magoni, M. (2017b). Verso la realizzazione di pratiche resilienti per una gestione sostenibile delle strutture scolastiche. In M. Fianchini, (a cura di), Rinnovare le scuole dall’interno. Scenari e strategie di miglioramento per le infrastrutture scolastiche, Maggioli Editore. Santarcangelo di Romagna (RM).
Malaguzzi, L. (2010). I cento linguaggi dei bambini. L’approccio di Reggio Emilia all’educazione dell’infanzia. Edizioni Junior, Bergamo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Magoni, M. (2020). Resilience Thinking and Sustainable School Infrastructure Management. In: Fianchini, M. (eds) Renewing Middle School Facilities . Research for Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19629-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19629-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19628-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19629-5
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)