Abstract
How does movie narration work on the viewer so that she comprehends a story? This chapter concerns the controversy in the philosophy of film over the right answer to this question. The focus is on the view that there are ubiquitous, implicit narrators in fiction films. The debate between friends and foes of the cinematic narrator has been at a stalemate most centrally because there seems to be no resolution as to whether the questions critics raise about the implied narrator in movies are legitimate ones to ask. In this chapter, I aim to advance the debate by examining how what is known as the “absurd imaginings” problem arises for all the central arguments for the elusive cinematic narrator and to discuss why the questions critics pose about this narrator are legitimate ones to ask.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
See Wilson’s discussion of the implied filmmaker of Letter from an Unknown Woman (1948) in Wilson (1986: 134–9). Some, such as David Bordwell, reject the notion of an “implied filmmaker” and, instead, prefers to talk about how the “narration itself ” cues the viewer to be surprised, sympathetic, and so on (Bordwell 1985: 62). Greg Currie (1995a, b) uses the concept of an “implied filmmaker” to address unreliable narration in fiction films.
- 6.
- 7.
For the same reason, some who accept the idea that storytelling or narration is an intentional activity reject Kendall Walton’s suggestion that there could be a “naturally occurring” and non-intentionally produced story, for instance, cracks in wood that seem to tell a story, provided the audience standardly decided to use such things as “props” in their game of make-believe (Walton 1990: 52).
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
Levinson describes the cinematic narrator as an agent who provides access to the story world. But in a note, he also endorses another role for the cinematic narrator: the cinematic narrator is also responsible for crafting the plot, the underlying sequences of events in the story (see Levinson 1996: 280, footnote 21).
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
Some philosophers, such as Noël Carroll, Colin McGinn, and Greg Currie maintain that imagining at the movies is standardly impersonal imagining. See Carroll (1995: 98–99, 2006, 2016), Currie (CitationRef CitationID="CR400">1991</CitationRef>, 1995a, b), and McGinn (2005) and Gaut (1998: 333–334, 2010: 217).
- 16.
For personal versus impersonal imaginings, see Currie (1990: 181–185).
- 17.
But see Thomson-Jones (2012), who argues that some films prompt the audience to imagine that they are moving within the world of the film.
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
See also Curran (2016: 103–106).
- 22.
- 23.
For Wilson’s view on imagined seeing as “seeing in” look at Wilson (2013: 167–168).
Bibliography
Beardsley, M. 1981. Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Booth, W. 1961. The Rhetoric of Fiction. University of Chicago Press.
Bordwell, D. 1985. Narration and the Fiction Film. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Carroll, N. 1990. Philosophy of Horror, or Paradoxes of the Heart. London: Routledge.
———. 1995. Review: Mimesis as Make-Believe. The Philosophical Quarterly 45 (178): 93–99.
———. 1996. Fiction, Nonfiction and the Film of Presumptive Assertion. In Film Theory and Philosophy, ed. Richard Allen and Murray Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2005. Introduction: Part IV: Film Narrative/Narration. In Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures, an Anthology, ed. Noël Carroll and Jinhee Choi, 175–184. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
———. 2006. Introduction to Part IV: Film Narrative/Narration. In N. Carroll and J. Choi (2004), 175–184.
———. 2008. The Philosophy of Motion Pictures. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
———. 2016. Motion Picture Narration. In K. Thomson-Jones, ed. (2016).
Carroll, N., and J. Choi. 2004. Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures: An Anthology. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Chatman, S. 1990. Coming to Terms: The Rhetoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Curran, A. 2016. Fictional Indeterminacy, Imagined Seeing, and Cinematic Narration. In K. Thomson-Jones, ed. (2016).
Currie, G. 1990. The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1991. Visual Fictions. The Philosophical Quarterly 41 (163 (April)): 129–143.
———. 1995a. Image and Mind: Film, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1995b. Unreliability Refigured: Narrative in Literature and Film. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (1): 19–29.
———. 2010. Narratives and Narrators: A Philosophy of Stories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2018. Visually Attending to Fictional Things. In Perceptual Imagination and Perceptual Memory, ed. Fiona Macpherson and Fabian Dorsch, 186–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davies, David. 2010. Eluding Wilson’s “Elusive Narrators”. Philosophical Studies 147: 387–394.
Gaut, B. (1997). Film Authorship and Collaboration. In R. Allen and M. Smith, eds. Film Theory and Philosophy. Oxford University Press: 149–72.
———. 1998. Imagination, Interpretation and Film. Philosophical Studies 89: 331–341.
———. 2004. The Philosophy of the Movies: Cinematic Narration. In P. Kivy, ed. (2004), 230–253.
———. 2010. A Philosophy of Cinematic Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopkins, R. 2008. What Do We See in Film? The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 66 (2): 149–159.
———. 2016. Realism in Film and Other Representations. In K. Thomson-Jones, ed. (2016).
Kania, A. 2005. Against the Ubiquity of Fictional Narrators. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63: 47–54.
Kivy, P., ed. 2004. The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics. 1st ed. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Köppe, T., and J. Stürhring. 2011. Against Pan-Narrator Theories. Journal of Literary Semantics 40: 59–80.
Lamarque, P. 1990. Reasoning What Is True in Fiction. Argumentation 4: 333–346.
Lamarque, P., and S.H. Olsen. 1994. Truth, Fiction, and Literature. A Philosophical Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, J. 1993. Seeing, Imaginarily, at the Movies. The Philosophical Quarterly 43: 70–78.
———. 1996. Film Music and Narrative Agency. In D. Bordwell and N. Carroll, eds. Post-Theory. Reconstructing Film Studies. The University of Wisconsin Press, 248–82.
Lewis, D. 1978. Truth in Fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1): 37–46.
Livingston, P. 1997. Cinematic Authorship. In R. Allen and M. Smith, eds. Film Theory and Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 132–48.
———. 2005. Narrative. In The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, ed. Berys Gaut and Dominic McIver Lopes, 2nd ed., 359–370. Oxon: Routledge Press.
———. 2013. The Imagined Seeing Thesis. Projections 7: 139–146.
Lorand, R. 2001. Telling a Story or Telling a World. British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (4): 425–443.
Matravers, D. 1997. The Paradox of Fiction: The Report Versus the Perceptual Model. In Emotion and the Arts, ed. Mette Hjort and Sue Laver, 78–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2014. Fiction and Narrative. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McGinn, C. 2005. The Power of Movies: How Screen and Mind Interact. New York: Pantheon.
Nehamas, A. 1981. The Postulated Author. Critical Inquiry 8: 133–149.
Pye, D. 2013. Seeing Fictions in Film. Projections 7: 131–138.
Schellekens, E. 2007. Aesthetics and Morality (Bloomsbury Aesthetics). Continuum. 63–92.
Stecker, R. 2013. Film Narration, Imaginative Seeing and Seeing-In. Projections 7: 147–154.
Stock, K. 2013. Imagining and Fiction: Some Issues. Philosophy Compass 8 (10): 887–896.
———. 2017. Only Imagine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thomson-Jones, K. 2007. The Literary Origins of the Cinematic Narrator. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1): 76–94.
———. 2009. Cinematic Narrators. Philosophy Compass 4 (2): 296–311.
———. 2012. Narration in Motion. British Journal of Aesthetics 52: 33–43.
———., ed. 2016. Current Controversies in the Philosophy of Film. New York/London: Routledge.
Walton, K. 1990. Mimesis and Make-Believe. On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walton, K. 2002. Depiction, Perception, and Imagination: Responses to Richard Wollheim. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (1): 27–35.
———. 2008. Marvelous Images: On Values and the Arts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, B. 1973. “Imagination and the Self”, in his Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956–1972, 26–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, G. 1986. Narration in Light: Studies in Cinematic Point of View. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
———. 1997. Le Grand Imagier Steps Out: The Primitive Basis of Film Narration. Philosophical Topics 25: 295–318.
Wilson, C. 2004. Literature and Knowledge. In Philosophy of Literature: Contemporary and Classic Readings, ed. E. John and D. Lopes. London: Blackwell.
Wilson, G. 2007. Elusive Narrators in Literature and Film. Philosophical Studies 135: 73–88.
———. 2011. Seeing Fictions in Film: The Epistemology of Movies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2013. Seeing through the Imagination in the Cinema. PRO 7: 155–171.
Wollheim, R. 1998. On Pictorial Representation. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56: 217–233.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Curran, A. (2019). Silly Questions and Arguments for the Implicit, Cinematic Narrator. In: Carroll, N., Di Summa, L.T., Loht, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19601-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19601-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19600-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19601-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)