Skip to main content

The Assessment of Visuospatial Abilities with Tangible Interfaces and Machine Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11486))

Abstract

Visuospatial abilities are framed in the capacity of perceiving, acting and reasoning in function of spatial coordinates, permitting to identify visual and spatial relationships among objects. They represent the set of skills conferring individuals the ability to interact with the surrounding world. Whenever spatial cognition is impaired it is important to correctly assess visuospatial abilities. Scientific literature, for this purpose, reports many diagnostic tools that have been adopted by clinicians and neuropsychologists.

In this paper we present a prototype that aims to evaluate the visuospatial abilities that are related to how individuals explore their peripersonal space. In particular, the presented tool makes use of tangible interfaces and augmented reality systems.

In the final part of this study we describe the implementation of an ecological test for the assessment of visuospatial abilities through our prototype by highlighting its advantage in terms of data collection and analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Angelini, R., Grossi, D.: La terapia razionale dei disturbi costruttivi. TeRaDic (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Appelros, P., Karlsson, G., Thorwalls, A., Tham, K., Nydevik, I.: Unilateral neglect: further validation of the baking tray task. J. Rehabil. Med. 36, 258–261 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. American Psychological Association: Committee on professional standards, American psychological Association, Board of Scientific Affairs, and committee on Psychological Tests and Assessment. Guidelines for computer-based tests and interpretations (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey, M.J., Riddoch, M.J., Crome, P.: Test-retest stability of three tests for unilateral visual neglect in patients with stroke: Star Cancellation, Line bisection, and the Baking Tray Task. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 14, 403–419 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benton, A.L., Varney, N.R., deS Hamsher, K.: Visuospatial judgment: a clinical test. Arch. Neurol. 35, 364–367 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cerrato, A., Ponticorvo, M.: Enhancing neuropsychological testing with gamification and tangible interfaces: the baking tray task. In: Ferrández Vicente, J.M., Álvarez-Sánchez, J.R., de la Paz López, F., Toledo Moreo, J., Adeli, H. (eds.) IWINAC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10338, pp. 147–156. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59773-7_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Cerrato, A., Siano, G., De Marco, A.: Augmented reality: from education and training applications to assessment procedures. Qwerty-Open Interdisc. J. Technol. Culture Educ. 13, 11–27 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cerrato, A., Ponticorvo, M., Bartolomeo, P., Miglino, O.: BTT-scan: An ecological and technology enhanced tool to assess visual neglect. Cogn. Process. 19, S36–S36 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chung, S.J., et al.: The computerized table setting test for detecting unilateral neglect. PloS one 11(1), e0147030 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Colom, R., Contreras, M., Shih, P.C., Santacreu, J., et al.: The assessment of spatial ability with a single computerized test. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 19(2), 92 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Di Fuccio, R., Ponticorvo, M., Ferrara, F., Miglino, O.: Digital and multisensory storytelling: narration with smell, taste and touch. In: Verbert, K., Sharples, M., Klobučar, T. (eds.) EC-TEL 2016. LNCS, vol. 9891, pp. 509–512. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Diller, L., et al.: Studies in cognition and rehabilitation in hemiplegia (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Facchin, A., Beschin, N., Pisano, A., Reverberi, C.: Normative data for distal line bisection and baking tray task. Neurol. Sci. 37, 1531–1536 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferrara, F., Ponticorvo, M., Di Ferdinando, A., Miglino, O.: Tangible interfaces for cognitive assessment and training in children: LogicART. In: Uskov, V.L., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Smart Education and e-Learning 2016. SIST, vol. 59, pp. 329–338. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39690-3_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Fordell, H., Bodin, K., Bucht, G., Malm, J.: A virtual reality test battery for assessment and screening of spatial neglect. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 123, 167–174 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garrido-Jurado, S., Muñoz-Salinas, R., Madrid-Cuevas, F.J., Marín-Jiménez, M.J.: Automatic generation and detection of highly reliable fiducial markers under occlusion. Pattern Recogn. 47(6), 2280–2292 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gigliotta, O., Bartolomeo, P., Miglino, O.: Approaching neuropsychological tasks through adaptive neurorobots. Connect. Sci. 27, 153–163 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gigliotta, O., Seidel Malkinson, T., Miglino, O., Bartolomeo, P.: Pseudoneglect in visual search: behavioral evidence and connectional constraints in simulated neural circuitry. eNeuro 4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0154-17.2017. eprint: http://www.eneuro.org/content/4/6/ENEURO.0154-17

  19. Goodale, M.A., Westwood, D.A., Milner, A.D.: Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action. Prog. Brain Res. 144, 131–144 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Halligan, P.W., Marshall, J.C.: Left visuo-spatial neglect: a meaningless entity? Cortex 28, 525–535 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. James, M., Warrington, E.: Visual object and space perception battery (VOSP) (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Japkowicz, N., Myers, C., Gluck, M., et al.: A novelty detection approach to classification. In: IJCAI, vol. 1, pp. 518–523 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miglino, O., Ponticorvo, M.: Enhancing multi-sensory and handling-based psycho-pedagogical approaches through new technologies (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L.G., Macko, K.A.: Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways. Trends Neurosci. 6, 414–417 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Osterieth, P.A.: Filetest de copie dune figure complex, contribution B letudede la perception et de la m&moire. Archives de Psychologie 30, 205–353 (1945)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pacella, D., Ponticorvo, M., Gigliotta, O., Miglino, O.: Basic emotions and adaptation. A computational and evolutionary model. PLOS ONE 12, 1–20 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Parsons, T.D.: Advanced Computational Intelligence Paradigms in Health-Care 6. Virtual Reality in Psychotherapy, Rehabilitation, and Assessment. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 337, pp. 271–289. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17824-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Rapcsak, S.Z., Verfaellie, M., Fleet, S., Heilman, K.M.: Selective attention in hemispatial neglect. Arch. Neurol. 46, 178–182 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rey, A.: L’examen psychologique dans les cas d’encéphalopathie traumatique. (Les problems.). Archives de psychologie (1941)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V.: The space around us. Science 277, 190–191 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tham, K.: The baking tray task: a test of spatial neglect. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 6, 19–26 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Urbanski, M., et al.: Négligence spatiale unilatérale: une conséquence dramatique mais souvent négligée des lésions de lhémisphère droit. Revue Neurologique 163, 305–322 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wilson, B., Cockburn, J., Halligan, P.: Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 68, 98–102 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Cerrato .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cerrato, A., Ponticorvo, M., Gigliotta, O., Bartolomeo, P., Miglino, O. (2019). The Assessment of Visuospatial Abilities with Tangible Interfaces and Machine Learning. In: Ferrández Vicente, J., Álvarez-Sánchez, J., de la Paz López, F., Toledo Moreo, J., Adeli, H. (eds) Understanding the Brain Function and Emotions. IWINAC 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11486. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19591-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19591-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19590-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19591-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics