Advertisement

The Construction of Identity in Interaction

  • Dariush Izadi
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter sets out to investigate the construction of identity in the situated context of the Persian ethnic shop under investigation. Through the analysis of the linguistic practices and mediational means (cultural tools) in the shop, the study foregrounds that a mediated discourse analysis and the application of mediational means embedded in service encounters provides a finer understanding of specific social practices and actions and local material contexts, which serve to ascribe social identities for shop-owners and customers. Such intricacies encourage us to re-evaluate our understanding of the critical complexity of the language practices of late-modern urban groups who employ and exploit features from a wide range of cultural and semiotic resources.

References

  1. Agha, A. (2007a). Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Agha, A. (2007b). Recombinant selves in mass mediated spacetime. Language & Communication, 27(3), 320–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (Eds.). (1998). Identities in talk. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London and Basingstoke: The Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailey, B. (2000). Communicative behavior and conflict between African-American customers and Korean immigrant retailers in Los Angeles. Discourse & Society, 11(1), 86–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  8. Beeman, W. O. (1986). Language, status, and power in Iran. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Blommaert, J. (2007). Sociolinguistics and discourse analysis: Orders of indexicality and polycentricity. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 2(2), 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blommaert, J. (2015). Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44(1), 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blommaert, J., & De Fina, A. (2017). Chronotopic identities: On the timespace organization of who we are. In A. De Fina, J. Wegner, & D. Ikizoglu (Eds.), Diversity and super-diversity. Sociocultural linguistic perspectives (pp. 1–15). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bucholtz, M. (1999). Bad examples: Transgression and progress in language and gender studies. In M. Bucholtz, A. C. Liang, & L. A. Sutton (Eds.), Reinventing identities (pp. 3–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Candlin, C. N. (2002). Alterity, perspective and mutuality in LSP research and practice. In M. Gotti, D. Heller, & M. Dossena (Eds.), Conflict and negotiation in specialized texts (pp. 21–40). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Day, D. (1998). Being ascribed, and resisting, membership of an ethnic group. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 151–170). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. De Fina, A. (2007). Code-switching and the construction of ethnic identity in a community of practice. Language in Society, 36(3), 371–392.Google Scholar
  21. De Fina, A. (2008). Who tells which story and why? Micro and macro contexts in narrative. Text & Talk, 28(3), 421–442.Google Scholar
  22. De Fina, A., Schiffrin, D., & Bamberg, M. (Eds.). (2006). Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Filliettaz, L. (2005). Mediated actions, social practices, and contextualization: A case study from service encounters. In S. Norris & R. H. Jones (Eds.), Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis (pp. 100–109). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Garot, R., & Berard, T. (2011). Ethnomethodology and membership categorization analysis. In R. Wodak, B. Johnstone, & P. Kerswill (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 125–138). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday, Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  27. Goffman, E. (1964). The neglected situation. American Anthropologist, 66(6), 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organisation of experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  30. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gumperz, J. (1972). Sociolinguistics and communication in small groups. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  32. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (1997a). The reflexive constitution of category, predicate and context in two settings. In S. Hester & P. Eglin (Eds.), Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis (pp. 25–48). Boston, MA: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  34. Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (Eds.). (1997b). Culture in action: Studies in membership mategorization analysis. Boston, MA: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  35. Hill, J. (2008). The everyday language of white racism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Sharing the tools of the trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 29(5), 523–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Izadi, D. (2015). Spatial engagement in Persian ethnic shops in Sydney. Multimodal Communication, 4(1), 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Izadi, D., & Parvaresh, V. (2016). The framing of the linguistic landscapes of Persian shop signs in Sydney. Linguistic Landscape, 2(2), 182–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C. (2009). Taking an elitist stance. In A. Jaffee (Ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 195–226). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C. (Eds.). (2010). Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  41. Jaworski, A., & Yeung, S. (2010). Life in the Garden of Eden: The naming and imagery of residential Hong Kong. In E. Shohamy, E. Ben-Rafael, & M. Barni (Eds.), Linguistic landscapes in the city (pp. 155–182). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  42. Jayyusi, L. (1984). Categorization and the moral order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Jones, R. H. (2016). Spoken discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  44. Karimzad, F. (2016). Life here beyond now: Chronotopes of the ideal life among Iranian transnationals. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(5), 607–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Koutlaki, S. A. (2002). Offers and expressions of thanks as face enhancing acts: tæ’arof in Persian. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(12), 1733–1756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  47. Leech, G. (1999). The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. In H. Hasselgård & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of corpora: Studies in honour of Stig Johansson (pp. 107–118). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  48. Merritt, M. (1976). On questions following questions in service encounters. Language in Society, 5(3), 315–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Norris, S. (2007). The micropolitics of personal national and ethnicity identity. Discourse & Society, 18(5), 653–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Norris, S. (2011). Identity in (inter)action: Introducing multimodal (inter)action analysis. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pennycook, A., & Otsuji, E. (2015). Metrolingualism: Language in the city. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Perrino, S. (2015). Chronotopes: Time and space in oral narrative. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis (pp. 140–159). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  54. Placencia, M. E. (2004). Rapport-building activities in corner shop interactions. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(2), 215–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rendle-Short, J. (2010). ‘Mate’ as a term of address in ordinary interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(5), 1201–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sacks, H. (1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 31–74). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  57. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation, vols. 1 and 2. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  58. Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In N. J. Enfield & T. Stivers (Eds.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives (pp. 23–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Scollon, R. (1997). Handbills, tissues, and condoms: A site of engagement for the construction of identity in public discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 1(1), 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Scollon, R. (2008). Discourse itineraries: Nine processes of resemiotization. In V. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, & R. Jones (Eds.), Advances in discourse studies (pp. 233–244). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Scollon, R., Scollon, S. W., & Jones, R. H. (2012). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach (3rd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  65. Silverstein, M. (1993). Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In J. A. Lucy (Ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics (pp. 33–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stokoe, E. (2012). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies, 14(3), 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. ten Have, P. (2004). Understanding qualitative research and ethnomethodology. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thurlow, C., & Jaworski, A. (2014). ‘Two hundred ninety-four’: Remediation and multimodal performance in tourist placemaking. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(4), 459–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Watson, R. (1978). Categorization, authorization and blame-negotiation in conversation. Sociology, 12(1), 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identity as an analyst’s and a participants’ resource. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 191–206). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  71. Wortham, S. (2003). Accomplishing identity in participant-denoting discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 13(2), 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wortham, S. (2004). From good student to outcast: The emergence of a classroom identity. Ethos, 32(2), 164–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Identity, context and interaction. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 87–106). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dariush Izadi
    • 1
  1. 1.Western Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations