Abstract
Mobility is fundamental for enhancing the individual possibility to pursue one’s own aspirations. Every person needs to be mobile to reach those opportunities she has reason to value, depending on her needs, attitudes and interests. Despite different individual habits, skills and attitudes, mobility has the same enabling role for any individual, an aspect that the prevailing operational approaches to urban mobility issues nonetheless still tend to overlook. Yet a growing stream of theoretical approaches in the field of mobilities seems to be working in the direction of enhancing individuals’ ability to move and, consequently, their ability to access the opportunities they have reason to value. In transport planning and policy approaches, these reflections produced some experiments that have not yet been consolidated as ordinary practice. To address the issue, this book intends to investigate how established transport planning tools can evolve to understand and plan for ever changing contemporary mobilities. As an introduction, this chapter discusses the main conceptual and operational approaches that consider mobility to be an enabling condition. The cases presented in the book intend to introduce how to revisit established tools in light of enhancing the enabling role of mobility, as well as how emerging and experimental tools may influence urban mobility planning and policy approaches.
This chapter was co-authored by Giovanni Vecchio and Paola Pucci.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adey P (2006) If mobility is everything then it is nothing: towards a relational politics of (im)mobilities. Mobilities 1(1):75–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100500489080
Adey P, Bissel D (2010) Mobilities, meetings, and futures: an interview with John Urry. Environ Plan D Soc Space 28:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1068/d3709
Angelo H, Wachsmuth D (2015) Urbanizing urban political ecology: a critique of methodological cityism. Int J Urban Reg Res 39(1):16–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12105
Beyazit E (2011) Evaluating social justice in transport: lessons to be learned from the capability approach. Transp Rev 31(1):117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2010.504900
Brenner N, Schmid C (2015) The epistemology of urban morphology. City 19(2–3):151–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712
Bührmann S (2010) Guidelines for implementers of travel training for public transport. Brussels
Canzler W, Kaufmann V, Kesselring S (eds) (2008) Tracing mobilities. Ashgate, Farnham
Cass N, Faulconbridge J (2016) Commuting practices: new insights into modal shift from theories of social practice. Transp Policy 45:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.08.002
Cass N, Shove E, Urry J (2005) Social exclusion, mobility and access. Sociol Rev 53(3):539–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00565.x
Chu X, Fielding GJ, Lamar BW (1992) Measuring transit performance using data envelopment analysis. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 26(3):223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-8564(92)90033-4
Cresswell T (2006) On the move: mobility in the modern western world. Routledge, London
Cresswell T, Merriman P (eds) (2011) Geographies of mobilities: practices, spaces, subjects. Ashgate, Farnham
Dijst M, Rietveld P, Steg L (2013) Individual needs, opportunities and travel behaviour: a multidisciplinary perspective based on psychology, economics and geography. In: Van Wee B, Annema JA, Banister D (eds) The transport system and transport policy. Elgar, Celtenham, pp 19–50
Docherty I, Marsden G, Anable J (2017) The governance of smart mobility. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 115:114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.012
Dong X, Ben-Akiva ME, Bowman JL, Walker JL (2006) Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 40(2):163–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2005.05.002
Filion P, Keil R (2017) Contested infrastructures: tension, inequity and innovation in the global suburb. Urban Policy Res 35(1):7–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2016.1187122
Flamm M, Kaufmann V (2006) Operationalising the concept of motility: a qualitative study. Mobilities 1(2):167–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100600726563
Goodman A, Jones A, Roberts H, Steinbach R, Green J (2014) “We can all just get on a bus and go”: rethinking independent mobility in the context of the universal provision of free bus travel to young Londoners. Mobilities 9(2):275–293. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2012-201753.101
Gössling S (2016) Urban transport justice. J Transp Geogr 54:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2016.05.002
Hananel R, Berechman J (2016) Justice and transportation decision-making: the capabilities approach. Transp Policy 49:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.005
Inoi H, Nitta Y (2005) The planning of the community transport from the viewpoint of well-being: applying Amartya Sen’s capability approach. Proc East Asia Soc Transp Stud 5:2330–2341
Jensen OB (2009) Flows of meaning, cultures of movements—urban mobility as meaningful everyday life practice. Mobilities 4(1):139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100802658002
Kaufmann V (2002) Re-thinking mobility. Ashgate, Farnham
Kaufmann V, Bergmann MM, Joye D (2004) Motility: mobility as capital. Int J Urban Reg Res 28(4):745–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00549.x
Kębłowski W (2018 Aug 24) Public transport can be free. Jacobin
Kenyon S, Lyons G, Rafferty J (2002) Transport and social exclusion: Investigating the possibility of promoting inclusion through virtual mobility. J Transp Geogr 10(3):207–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00012-1
Kronlid D (2008) Mobility as Capability. In: Uteng TP, Cresswell T (eds) Gendered mobilities. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 15–34
Larsen J, Axhausen KW, Urry J (2006) Geographies of social networks: meetings, travel and communications. Mobilities 1(2):261–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100600726654
Le Breton É (ed) (2005) Bouger pour s’en sortir: mobilité quotidienne et intégration sociale. Armand Colin, Paris
Litman T (2013) Measuring transport system efficiency. Victoria
Lucas K (2012) Transport and social exclusion: where are we now? Transp Policy 20:105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
Lucas K, Mattioli G, Verlinghieri E, Guzman A (2016) Transport poverty and its adverse social consequences. Proc Inst Civ Eng Transp 169(6):353–365. https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.15.00073
Martens K (2006) Basing transport planning on principles of social justice. Berkeley Plan J 19:1–17
Martens K (2017a) Transport justice: designing fair transportation systems. Routledge, New York, London
Martens K (2017b) Why accessibility measurement is not merely an option, but an absolute necessity. In: Punto N, Hull A (eds) Accessibility tools and their applications. Routledge, New York, London
Martens K, Golub A (2012) A justice-theoretic exploration of accessibility measures. In: Geurs KT, Krizek KJ, Reggiani A (eds) Accessibility analysis and transport planning: challenges for Europe and North America. Elgar, Celtenham, pp 195–210
Orfeuil J-P (ed) (2004) Transports, pauvretés, exclusions: Pouvoir bouger pour s’en sortir. La Tour d’Aigues: Éditions de l’Aube
Pereira RHM, Schwanen T, Banister D (2017) Distributive justice and equity in transportation. Transp Rev 37(2):170–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1257660
Preston J, Rajé F (2007) Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion. J Transp Geogr 15(3):151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.05.002
Purwanto AJ (2003) Measuring inequality in mobility: a capability perspective. In: 3rd conference on the capability approach. Pavia
Sen AK (2000) The discipline of cost-benefit analysis. J Legal Stud 29(S2):931–952. https://doi.org/10.1086/468100
Sheller M, Urry J (2006) The new mobilities paradigm. Environ Plan A 38(2):207–226. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268
Sheller M, Urry J (2016) Mobilizing the new mobilities paradigm. Appl Mobil 1(1):10–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2016.1151216
Social Exclusion Unit (2003) Report on transport and social exclusion. London
Sheller M (2018) Mobility Justice. The politics of movement in an age of extremes. Verso, London-Brooklyn
Stanley J, Vella-Brodrick D (2009) The usefulness of social exclusion to inform social policy in transport. Transp Policy 16(3):90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.02.003
Urry J (2000) Sociology beyond societies: mobilities for the twenty-first century. Routledge, Abingdon
Urry J (2007) Mobilities. Polity Press, Cambridge
Van Wee B (2011) Transport and ethics: ethics and the evaluation of transport policies and projects. Elgar, Celtenham
Van Wee B (2013a) Land use and transport. In: Van Wee B, Annema JA, Banister D (eds) The transport system and transport policy. Elgar, Celtenham, pp 78–100
Van Wee B (2013b) The traffic and transport system and effects on accessibility, the environment and safety: an introduction. In: Van Wee B, Annema JA, Banister D (eds) The transport system and transport policy. Elgar, Celtenham, pp 4–18
Van Wee B, Geurs K (2011) Discussing equity and social exclusion in accessibility evaluations. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 11(4):350–367
Webber M (1964) The urban place and the nonplace urban realm. In: Webber M (ed) Explorations into urban structure. Pennsylvania University Press, Philadelphia
Wismadi A, Zuidgeest M, Brussel M, van Maarseveen M (2014) Spatial Preference Modelling for equitable infrastructure provision: an application of Sen’s capability approach. J Geogr Syst 16(1):19–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-013-0185-4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pucci, P., Vecchio, G. (2019). Enabling Mobilities: Reinterpreting Concepts and Tools. In: Enabling Mobilities. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19581-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19581-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19580-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19581-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)