Abstract
This chapter argues that discretion should be seen not only as an inevitable but also a potentially highly beneficial feature of bureaucratic organization. Taking a Weberian view of bureaucracy, we make two case-based arguments. First, we suggest that discretion is an invaluable characteristic of administrative office-holding to such an extent that, for example, the senior civil servant’s instituted purpose can best be described as ‘administrative statecraft’. Second, we argue with reference to the clinical hospital that office-holding and classic bureaucratic capacities are not located in opposition to the exercise of professional discretion. Rather, the professional’s discretionary capabilities are inseparably linked to the establishment of clear lines of command, delineated and well-defined distribution of responsibilities and obligations through a system of offices, as well as a high degree of formalization and rule-based conduct. Hence bureaucratic discretion is seen as the exercise of casuistical, prudential judgement. We end the chapter by arguing that attempts to curtail bureaucratic discretion carry with them a number of significant risks to the ability of specific bureaucracies to fulfill their instituted purposes—in public, private and professional domains alike.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ackroyd, S. & Muzio, D. (2008). Redirections in the study of expert labour: Established professions and new expert occupations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Barnard, C.I. (1938/1968). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Becker, H.S., Geer, B., Hughes, E.C. & Strauss, A. (1961). Boys in white: Student culture in medical school. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bezes, P., Demazière, D., Biamic, T.L. et al. (2012). New public management and professionals in the public sector: What new patterns beyond opposition. Sociologie du Travail, 54(1), 152.
Blau, P.M. (1968). The hierarchy of authority in organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 1967–1968, 453–467.
Bosk, C. (2003, 1972). Forgive and remember: Managing medical failure (2nd ed.). London and Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brown, W. (1965). Exploration in management. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Brown, W. (1974). Organization. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Chapman, R.A. (2000). Ethics in public service for the new millennium. In R.A. Chapman (Ed.), Ethics in public service for the new millennium (pp. 217–231). Aldershot: Ashgate.
du Gay, P. (2000). In praise of bureaucracy. London: Sage.
du Gay, P. (2009). Max Weber and the ethics of office. In P. Adler (Ed.), Oxford handbook of sociology and organizational studies: Classical foundations (pp. 146–73). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fox, R. (1957). Training for Uncertainty. In R.K. Merton, G. Reader & P.L. Kendall (Eds), The student-physician: Introductory studies in the sociology of medical education (pp. 207–241). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fox, R. (1959). Experiment perilous: Physicians and patients facing the unknown. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Freidson, E. (1988). Profession of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism, the third logic: On the practice of knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Giauque, D. (2003). New public management and organizational regulation: The liberal bureaucracy. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(4), 567–592
Gleeson, D. & Knights, D. (2006). Challenging dualism: Public professionalism in ‘troubled’ times. Sociology, 40(2), 277–295.
Goodsell, C. (2015). The new case for bureaucracy. London: Sage.
Jonsen, A.R. & Toulmin, S. (1988). The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kelly, J. (1968). Is scientific management possible? Critical examination of Glacier’s theory of organization. London: Faber & Faber.
Marshall, T.H. (2000). A note on “Status”. In P. du Gay et al. (Eds), Identity: A reader (pp. 304–310). London: Sage.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Noordegraaf, M. (2007). From ‘pure’ to ‘hybrid’ professionalism: Present-day professionalism in ambiguous public domains. Administration & Society, 39(6), 761–785.
Numerato, D., Salvatore, D. & Fattore, G. (2012). The impact of management on medical professionalism: A review. Sociology of Health and Illness, 34(4), 626–644.
Parker, R.S. (1993). The administrative vocation: Selected essays (pp. xiii–xxiii). Sydney: Hale & Ironmonger.
Parsons, T. (1939). The professions and social structure. Social Forces, 17(4), 457–467.
Parsons, T. (1947). Introduction. In Max Weber, theory of social and economic organization (A.M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans. & Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Pedersen, K.Z. (2018). Organizing patient safety: Failsafe fantasies and pragmatic practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Perrow, C. (1960). Authority, goals and prestige in a general hospital. PhD thesis, University of California.
Perrow, C. (1965). Hospitals: Technology, structure and goals. In J.G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organization. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Perrow, C. (2014, 1972). Complex organizations: A critical essay (3rd ed.). Vermont: Echo Point Books.
Perrow, C. (1970). Departmental power and perspectives in industrial firms. In M. Zald (Ed.), Power in organizations. Nasville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press
Rohr, J.A. (1999). Public service, ethics, and constitutional practice. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Schaefer, D. & Schaefer, R. (1992). Editors introduction: Sir Henry Taylor and the study of public administration. In D. Schaefer & R. Schaefer (Eds), The Statesman by Sir Henry Taylor. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Stinchcombe, A. (2001) When formality works: Authority and abstraction in law and organizations. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Storing, H. (1998). American statesmanship: Old and new. In J.M. Bessette (Ed.), Toward a more perfect union: Writings of Herbert J. Storing (pp. 403–28). Washington, DC: The AEI Press.
Taylor, Sir H. ([1836]/1992). In D.L. Schaefer & R.R. Schaefer (Eds), The statesman. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Thomas, R. (1978). The British philosophy of administration: A comparison of British and American ideas, 1900–1939. London: Longman.
Toren, N. (1976). Bureaucracy and professionalism: A reconsideration of Weber’s thesis. The Academy of Management Review, 1(3), 36–46.
Travers, M. (2007). The New Bureaucracy: Quality assurance and its critics. Bristol: Policy Press.
Uhr, J. (1993). Administrative responsibility and responsible administrators: An introduction. In R.S. Parker (Ed.), The administrative vocation: Selected essays (pp. xiii–xxiii). Sydney: Hale & Ironmonger.
Wagenaar, H. (2004). ‘Knowing’ the rules: Administrative work as practice. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 643–655.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: Vols I and II. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Weber, M. (1989). Science as a vocation. In P. Lassman & I. Velody (Eds), Max Weber’s AQ4 science as a vocation. London: Unwin Hyman.
Weber, M. (1994). In P. Lassman & R. Speirs. (Eds), Weber: Political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zacka, B. (2017). When the state meets the street: Public service and moral agency. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
du Gay, P., Pedersen, K.Z. (2020). Discretion and Bureaucracy. In: Evans, T., Hupe, P. (eds) Discretion and the Quest for Controlled Freedom. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19566-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19566-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19565-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19566-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)