Abstract
Around the world the private sector is increasingly committing to supporting sustainable agriculture through supply chain engagement. These sustainability efforts focus on one or more dimensions of economic, environmental or social concerns for agricultural producers and target goals to ensure adequate production, conserve natural resources and address global environmental challenges. Programs to establish industry standards of sustainability have been designed to address the most pressing local challenges for the producers, transparently document production practices, and provide requirements for adoption of alternative practices. Increasingly the question turns to whether these programs are resulting in environmental improvement. Programs that are designed specifically to achieve and verify measurable environmental impact are gaining acceptance but require re-thinking the design of sustainability programs to achieve that objective. Here we describe, and present lessons learned from, an example of this approach for commodity crop agriculture in the United States. Development of the approach is documented, with a focus on the scientific, technological and computational challenges of establishing accessible and meaningful metrics for assessing environmental change. This design can be adapted for other regions and agricultural systems where the key to improvement in environmental outcomes is productive co-development with all stakeholders.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ASABE (2016) ANSI/ASABE S629 Framework to Evaluate the Sustainability of Agricultural Production. Developed by the ASABE technical committee ASE-16 Engineering for Sustainability. Approved by ASABE and ANSI June 2016. 11p
Begue A, Arvor D, Bellon B et al (2018) Remote sensing and cropping practices: A review. Remote Sens 10(1):99. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10010099
Carlson J, Yaege L, Poore J et al (2018) Standardizing cropping system data for integrated agricultural resource assessment. In Mazdak Arabi, Olaf David, Jack Carlson, Daniel P. Ames (Eds.) 9th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/iemssconference/2018/.
David O, Lloyd W, Rojas K et al (2014) Model-as-a-Service (MaaS) using the Cloud Services Innovation Platform (CSIP). In Daniel P. Ames, Nigel W.T. Quinn, and Andrea E. Rizzoli (Eds.) International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs) 7th International Congress on Env. Modelling and Software, San Diego, CA, USA. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/iemssconference/2014/.
David O, Arabi M, Carlson J et al. (2016) Supporting collaborative model and data service development and deployment with DevOps, American Geophysical Union (AGU) Fall Meeting, December 12–16, 2016, http://abstractsearch.agu.org/meetings/2016/FM/H41B-1327.html.
Field to Market: The Keystone Alliance for Sustainable Agriculture (2009) Environmental Resource Indicators for Measuring Outcomes of On-Farm Agricultural Production in the United States. January 2009, Keystone, CO. Available from: www.Fieldtomarket.org.
Field to Market (2012) Environmental and Socioeconomic Indicators for Measuring Outcomes of On-Farm Agricultural Production in the United States (Version 2) December, 2012. Keystone, CO. Available from: www.Fieldtomarket.org.
Field to Market: The Alliance for Sustainable Agriculture (2016) Environmental and Socioeconomic Indicators for Measuring Outcomes of On Farm Agricultural Production in the United States (3rd Edn). ISBN: 978–0–692-81902-9. December 2016. Washington, DC. Available from: www.fieldtomarket.org/national-indicators-report-2016/
Flanagan DC, Gilley JE, Franti TG (2007) Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP): development history, model capabilities and future enhancements. Trans ASABE 50(5):1603–1612
Floress K, Garcia de Jalon S, Church SP et al (2017) Toward a theory of farmer conservation attitudes: dual interests and willingness to take action to protect water quality. J Environ Psychol 53:73–80
Friedberg S (2018) Assembled but unrehearsed: corporate food power and the ‘dance’ of supply chain sustainability. J Peasant Stud. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2018.1534835
Hartman Group (2018) Organic and natural 2018 study overview. www.hartman-group.com
IPCC (2006) In: Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, prepared by the national greenhouse gas inventories programme. IGES, Japan. http://www.ipccnggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol4.html
ISEAL (2013) Principles for credible and effective sustainability standards systems, ISEAL Credibility Principles, ISEAL Alliance, 2013
Jones J, Antle J, Basso B et al (2017) Brief history of agricultural systems modeling. Agric Syst 155:240–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.05.014
Kroeger A, Bakharty H, Haupt F et al (2017) Eliminating deforestation from the Cocoa supply chain. World Bank Report. March 2017. Washington DC http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/876071495118818649/pdf/115144-REVISED-20170530-Cocoa-final-updated.pdf
Linquist BA, Marcos M, Adviento-Borbe A et al (2018) Greenhouse gas emissions and management practices that impact emissions in US rice production systems. J Environ Qual. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2017.11.0445
O’Neill R, McElroy S (2017) Targeting value, setting, tracking & integrating high-impact sustainability goals. http://s10458.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/sa-es-targeting-value.pdf
Paustian K, Brown K, Easter M (2018) Farm-scale full GHG accounting with the COMET-Farm tool. In Mazdak Arabi, Olaf David, Jack Carlson, Daniel P. Ames (Eds.) 9th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/iemssconference/2018/.
PRISM Climate Group (2018) PRISM climate data, Northwest Alliance for computational science and engineering, http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu
Reese CL, Clay DE, Clay SA et al (2014) Winter cover crops impact on corn production in semiarid regions. Agron J 106(4):1479–1488. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj13.0540
RESOLVE Steering Committee of the State-of-Knowledge Assessment of Standards and Certification (2012) Toward sustainability: the roles and limitations of certification. RESOLVE, Inc, Washington, DC
Serafin F, David O, Dozier A et al (2018) Framework-enabled meta-modeling. In Mazdak Arabi, Olaf David, Jack Carlson, Daniel P. Ames (Eds.) 9th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/iemssconference/2018/.
Soil Quality Institute (2003) Interpreting the soil conditioning index: a tool for measuring soil organic matter trends. Soil Quality – Agronomy Technical Note No. 16. USDA NRCS. April 2003
Thomson AM, Ramsey S, Barnes E et al (2017) Science in the supply chain: Collaboration opportunities for advancing sustainable agriculture in the United States. Agric Environ Lett 2:170015. https://doi.org/10.2134/ael2017.05.0015
Traff K, Wible T, Yaege L, et al (2018) Building containerized environmental models using continuous integration with Jenkins and Kubernetes. In Mazdak Arabi, Olaf David, Jack Carlson, Daniel P. Ames (Eds.) 9th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/iemssconference/2018/.
USEPA (2018) Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2016. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks
USDA (2015) Summary report: 2012 national resources inventory. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC, and Center for Survey Statistics and Methodology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. 210 pages. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcseprd396218.pdf
USDA ERS (2016) ARMS farm financial and crop production practices database. All data accessed June–August 2016. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/arms-farm-financial-and-crop-production-practices/tailored-reports-crop-production-practices.aspx
USDA NASS (2016a) National agricultural statistics service quick Stats 2.0 Database. All data accessed June–August 2016. https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/
USDA NASS (2016b) Agricultural chemical usage report. Online data for all crops after 2009. All data accessed June–August 2016. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Surveys/Guide_to_NASS_Surveys/Chemical_Use/
USDA NASS (2014) 2013 Farm & Ranch Irrigation Survey. In 2012 Census of Agriculture. Available from https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Online_Resources/Farm_and_Ranch_Irrigation_Survey/
USDA-NRCS (2018) Soil data access – query services for custom access to soil data, https://sdmdataaccess.nrcs.usda.gov.
USDA-ARS (2018) Cligen stochastic weather generator, https://www.ars.usda.gov/midwest-area/west-lafayette-in/national-soil-erosion-research/docs/wepp/cligen/.
Verburg P, Mertz O, Erb K-H et al (2013) Land system change and food security: towards multi-scale land systems solutions. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:494–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.003
Wagner (2013) A history of wind erosion prediction models in the United States department of agriculture: the wind erosion prediction system (WEPS). Aeolian Res 10(2013):9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2012.10.001
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Field to Market member organizations and the Keystone Policy Center in developing the program described here.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thomson, A. et al. (2020). Defining Sustainability as Measurable Improvement in the Environment: Lessons from a Supply Chain Program for Agriculture in the United States. In: Khaiter, P., Erechtchoukova, M. (eds) Sustainability Perspectives: Science, Policy and Practice. Strategies for Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19550-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19550-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19549-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19550-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)