Abstract
Destructive, deforming social institutions are those that make it difficult or impossible for the people who belong to them to satisfy their true human needs. Drawing on Marcuse’s distinction between true human needs and false human needs, we argue that true human needs are universal across humanity and essentially bound up with human dignity in a Kantian sense. False human needs, in contrast, encompass anything that people desire, no matter how intensely or repeatedly, whose satisfaction represses, impedes, or outright destroys the satisfaction of true human needs. In contemporary neoliberal societies like the USA, people’s true human needs, both as individual and social beings, are systematically replaced by false human needs for money, property, and social status. Such collective sociopathy, we argue, can be understood as resulting from the systematic interplay of three factors: neoliberal ideology, a scientistic worldview, and coercive authoritarianism. What makes the social institutions within such societies destructive and deforming is that they centrally involve commodification, mechanization, coercion, the incentivization of desire, and false consciousness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This is not to overlook the global moral and political disasters of homelessness, malnutrition, poverty, preventable disease, and refugees, such that at least three billion people, worldwide, cannot even satisfy their basic true human needs.
References
van Dijk, Ludger, and Erik Rietveld. 2017. Foregrounding sociomaterial practice in our understanding of affordances: The skilled intentionality framework. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1969.
Fromm, Erich. 1941. The fear of freedom. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Haack, Susan. 2018. Scientism and its discontents. Rounded Globe. https://roundedglobe.com/books/1b42f98a-13b1-4784-9054-f243cd49b809/Scientism%20and%20its%20Discontents/.
Hamann, Trent. 2009. Neoliberalism, governmentality, and ethics. Foucault Studies 6: 37–59.
Hanna, Robert. 2018b. The rational human condition. Vol. 2—Deep freedom and real persons: A study in metaphysics. New York: Nova Science.
———. 2018c. The rational human condition. Vol. 3—Kantian ethics and human existence: A study in moral philosophy. New York: Nova Science.
Harvey, David. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lofgren, Mike. 2014. Anatomy of the deep state. Moyers and Company, February 21. http://billmoyers.com/2014/02/21/anatomy-of-the-deep-state/.
Marcuse, Herbert. 1964. One dimensional man. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Mihai, Michaela. 2016. Theorizing change: Between reflective judgment and the inertia of political habitus. European Journal of Political Theory 15 (1): 22–42.
Mills, C. Wright. 1956/2000. The power elite. http://www.eindtijdinbeeld.nl/EiBBibliotheek/Boeken/The_Power_Elite_-_New_Edition__first_fullscale_study_of_structure_and_distribution_of_power_in_USA___2000_.pdf.
Mill, John Stuart. 1977. Essays on politics and society, part I. http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/mill-the-collected-works-of-john-stuart-mill-volume-xviii-essays-on-politics-and-society-part-i/simple.
Mühlhoff, Rainer, and Jan Slaby. 2017. Immersion at work: Affect and power in post-Fordist work Cultures. In Affect in relation: Families, places, technologies, ed. B. Röttger-Rössler and J. Slaby, 1–21. New York: Routledge. https://www.academia.edu/32615026/Immersion_at_work_Affect_and_power_in_post-Fordist_work_cultures.
Pettit, Philip. 2017. The big brotherhood. IAI News, September 13. https://iainews.iai.tv/articles/the-big-brotherhood-of-digital-giants-is-taking-away-our-freedom-auid-884.
Reporters Without Borders. 2018. https://rsf.org/en.
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing like a state. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Slaby, Jan. 2016. Relational affect. https://www.academia.edu/25728787/Relational_Affect.
Thoreau, Henry David. 1995. Walden. In H.D. Thoreau, Walden and on the duty of civil disobedience. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/205/205-h/205-h.htm.
Watermeyer, Richard, and Mark Olssen. 2016. “Excellence” and exclusion: The individual costs of institutional competitiveness. Minerva 54: 201–218.
Wikipedia. 2018a. Military-industrial complex. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military%E2%80%93industrial_complex.
———. 2018b. The power elite. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_Elite.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maiese, M., Hanna, R. (2019). What Is a Destructive, Deforming Institution?. In: The Mind-Body Politic. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19546-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19546-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19545-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19546-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)