Abstract
Labor planning and allocation are critical success factors for hospitals in today’s low margin, competitive healthcare environment. This research investigated the design and evaluation of an innovative labor planning and allocation system co-created with a practitioner team responsible for nursing labor management across departments in multiple hospitals within a North American hospital system. The research found a unique means to extend Design Science Research theory and practice using a Systems Theory approach to the design, build and evaluation of innovative labor allocation information and management systems within the existing hospital systems. The “system of systems” approach identified conflicting structures of management processes that prevented system balancing feedback loops from operating efficiently. An elaborated Action Design Research (eADR) method used a guided, emergent approach to redesign the structure, roles, and tasks of labor planning and allocation within this system of systems framework. The instantiated innovative nursing labor-management model was shown to benefit from its theory-ingrained approach to deliver a significantly improved labor allocation outcome for each level of the system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mark, B.A., Harless, D.W., McCue, M., Xu, Y.: A longitudinal examination of hospital registered nurse staffing and quality of care. Health Serv. Res. 39(2), 279–300 (2004)
Needleman, J., Buerhaus, P., Mattke, S., Stewart, M., Zelevinsky, K.: Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals. N. Engl. J. Med. 346(22), 1715–1722 (2002)
Welton, J.M.: Hospital nursing workforce costs, wages, occupational mix, and resource utilization. J. Nurs. Adm. 41(7/8), 309–314 (2011)
Ashforth, B.E., Mael, F.: Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(1), 20–39 (2016)
Mullarkey, M.T., Hevner, A.R.: An elaborated action design research process model. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 28(1), 6–20 (2019)
Castillo-Salazar, J.A., Landa-Silva, D., Qu, R.: Workforce scheduling and routing problems: literature survey and computational study. Ann. Oper. Res. 239(1), 39–67 (2016)
Defraeye, M., Van Nieuwenhuyse, I.: Staffing and scheduling under nonstationary demand for service: a literature review. Omega (UK) 58, 4–25 (2016)
Park, S.H., Blegen, M.A., Spetz, J., Chapman, S.A., De Groot, H.A.: Comparison of nurse staffing measurements in staffing-outcomes research. Med. Care 53(1), e1–e8 (2015)
Van Den Bergh, J., Belien, J., De Bruecker, P., Demeulemeester, E., De Boeck, L.: Personnel scheduling: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 226(3), 367–385 (2013)
von Bertalanffy, L.: An outline of general systems theory. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 1(2), 134–165 (1950)
Boulding, K.: General systems theory-the skeleton of science. Manag. Sci. 2(3), 197–208 (1956)
Meyer, R.M., O’Brien-Pallas, L.L.: Nursing services delivery theory: an open system approach. J. Adv. Nurs. 66(12), 2828–2838 (2010)
Glover, W., Li, Q., Naveh, E., Gross, M.: improving quality of care through integration in a hospital setting: a human systems integration approach. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 64(3), 1–12 (2017)
Marsilio, M., Torbica, A., Villa, S.: Health care multidisciplinary teams: the socio-technical approach for an integrated system-wide perspective. Health Care Manag. Rev. 42(4), 303–314 (2017)
Tay, H.L.: Examining trade-offs in hospital operations using a systems approach in an acute care setting. Int. J. Bus. Inf. 11(2), 264–284 (2016)
Pasmore, W., Shani, A., Francis, C., Haldeman, J.: Sociotechnical systems: a North American reflection on empirical studies of the seventies. Hum. Relat. 32(12), 1179–1204 (1982)
Shani, A.B., Grant, R.M., Krishnan, R., Thompson, E.: Advanced manufacturing systems and organisational choice: a sociotechnical system approach. Calif. Manag. Rev. 34(4), 91–111 (1992)
Silva-Martinez, J.: Human systems integration: process to help minimize human errors, a systems engineering perspective for human space exploration missions. Reach 2(2–4), 8–23 (2016)
Harrison-Broninski, K.: Human Interactions: the Heart and Soul of Business Process Management, 1st edn. (2005)
Hulshof, P.J.H., Kortbeek, N., Boucherie, R.J., Hans, E.W., Bakker, P.J.M.: Taxonomic classification of planning decisions in health care: a structured review of the state of the art in OR/MS. Health Syst. 1(2), 129–175 (2012)
Ould, M.A.: Business Processes: Modeling and Analysis for Re-Engineering and Improvement. Wiley, Hoboken (1995)
Phalp, K.T., Henderson, P., Walters, R.J., Abeysinghe, G.: RolEnact: role-based enactable models of business processes. Inf. Softw. Technol. 40(3), 123–133 (1998)
Seo, W., Yoon, J., Lee, J., Kim, K.: A state-driven modeling approach to human interactions for knowledge intensive services. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(3), 1917–1930 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tarpey, R.J., Mullarkey, M.T. (2019). Extending Design Science Research Through Systems Theory: A Hospital System of Systems. In: Tulu, B., Djamasbi, S., Leroy, G. (eds) Extending the Boundaries of Design Science Theory and Practice. DESRIST 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11491. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19504-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19504-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19503-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19504-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)