Advertisement

Design Principles for E-Learning that Support Integration Work: A Case of Action Design Research

  • Amir Haj-BolouriEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11491)

Abstract

Design principles are prescriptive knowledge that offers theory-based guidelines for Design Science Research in Information Systems. This paper introduces and proposes a set of design principles for e-learning that support integration work. The design principles are proposed based on two cycles of Action Design Research. The cycles were conducted in the organizational setting of stakeholders and end-users known as integration workers, which are responsible for supporting the integration process of newly arrived immigrants of society. Overall, the contributions of this paper are (1) e-learning technologies that support integration work, (2) prescriptive knowledge in form of design principles for designing e-learning technologies that support integration work, and (3) an explicit case of Action Design Research that demonstrates the process of shaping and re-shaping design principles through two different cycles.

Keywords

Design principles Action Design Research Design Science Research Information Systems Integration work E-Learning 

References

  1. 1.
    DeFreitas, S., Oliver, M.: Does e-learning policy drive change in higher education? A case study relating models of organizational change to e-learning implementation. J. High. Educ. Policy Manage. 27(1), 81–95 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luck, L., Jones, D., McConachie, J., Danaher, P.A.: Challenging enterprises and subcultures: interrogating ‘best practice’ in Central Queensland University’s course management systems, best practice in university learning and teaching: learning from our challenges. Theme Issue Stud. Learn. Eval. Innov. Dev. 1(2), 19–31 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee-Post, A.: E-learning success model: an information systems perspective. Electron. J. eLearning 7(1), 61–70 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., Fung, T.S.: Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet High. Educ. 13(1), 31–36 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Siritongthaworn, S., Krairit, D., Dimmitt, N.J., Paul, H.: The study of e-learning technology implementation: a preliminary investigation of universities in Thailand. Educ. Inf. Technol. 11(2), 137–160 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garrison, D.R.: E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. Taylor and Francis, London (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anonymized due to being the author of this paper and due to the reviewing processGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raynes-Goldie, K., Walker, L.: Our space: online civic engagement tools for youth. In: Bennett, W.L. (ed.) Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth, pp. 161–188. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bers, M.U.: Civic identities, online technologies: from designing civics curriculum to supporting civic experiences. Tufts University (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Westerlind, M.: Knowing at work: a study of professional knowledge in integration work directed to newly arrived immigrants. Doctoral Dissertation, University West (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action design research. MIS Q. 35(1), 35–56 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones, D.: An information systems design theory for e-learning. The Australian National University (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones, D., Gregor, S.: The formulation of an information systems design theory for e-learning. In: First International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, pp. 356–373 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Walls, J., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Inf. Syst. Res. 3(1), 36–59 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The anatomy of a design theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8(5), 312–335 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jones, D., Gregor, S., Lynch, T.: An information systems design theory for Web-based education. In: IASTED International Symposium on Web-based Education (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Venable, J.: The role of theory and theorizing in design science research. In: Proceedings of DESRIST (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, W.: Design Science Research Methods and Patterns. Innovating Information and Communication Technology. Auerbach, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tynjälä, P.: Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educ. Res. Rev. 3(2), 130–154 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, M.: Integrating organizational, social, and individual perspectives in Web 2.0-based workplace e-learning. Inf. Syst. Front. 13(2), 191–205 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Park, J.H., Wentling, T.: Factors associated with transfer of training in workplace e-learning. J. Workplace Learn. 19(5), 311–329 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang, M., Vogel, D., Ran, W.: Creating a performance-oriented e-learning environment: a design science approach. Inf. Manag. 48(7), 260–269 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cheng, B., Wang, M., Mørch, A.I., Chen, N.S., Spector, J.M.: Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000–2012: a bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educ. Res. Rev. 11, 56–72 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ellis, P.F., Kuznia, K.D.: Corporate e-learning impact on employees. Glob. J. Bus. Res. 8(4), 1 (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rana, H., Lal, M.: E-learning: issues and challenges. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 97(5) (2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tynjälä, P., Häkkinen, P.: E-learning at work: theoretical underpinnings and pedagogical challenges. J. Workplace Learn. 17(5/6), 318–336 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cheng, B., Wang, M., Moormann, J., Olaniran, B.A., Chen, N.S.: The effects of organizational learning environment factors on e-learning acceptance. Comput. Educ. 58(3), 885–899 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Admiraal, W., Lockhorst, D.: E-learning in small and medium-sized enterprises across Europe: attitudes towards technology, learning and training. Int. Small Bus. J. 27(6), 743–767 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kolas, L., Staupe, A.: A personalized e-learning interface. In: EUROCON: The International Conference on “Computer as a Tool”, pp. 2670–2675. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Becker, K., Newton, C., Sawang, S.: A learner perspective on barriers to e-learning. Aust. J. Adult Learn. 53(2), 211 (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Markus, M.L., Majchrzak, A., Gasser, L.: A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Q. 26(3), 179–212 (2002)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lindgren, R., Henfridsson, O., Schultze, U.: Design principles for competence management systems: a synthesis for an action research study. MIS Q. 28(3), 435–472 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Seidel, S., Chandra Kruse, L., Szekely, N., Gau, M., and Stieger, D.: Design principles for sensemaking support systems in environmental sustainability transformations. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. (2017)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Germonprez, M., Kendall, J.E., Mathiassen, L., Young, B., Warner, B.: A theory of responsive design: a field study of corporate engagement with open source communities. Inf. Syst. Res. 28(1), 64–83 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yang, L., Su, G., Yuan, H.: Design principles of integrated information platform for emergency responses. Inf. Syst. Res. 23(3), 761–786 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Babaian, T., Xu, J., Lucas, W.: ERP prototype with built-in task and process support. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. (2017)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S., Purao, S.: Making use of design principles. In: Parsons, J., Tuunanen, T., Venable, J., Donnellan, B., Helfert, M., Kenneally, J. (eds.) DESRIST 2016. LNCS, vol. 9661, pp. 37–51. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39294-3_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gregor, S., Imran, A., Turner, T.: A ‘sweet spot’ change strategy for a least developed country: leveraging e-government in Bangladesh. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 23(6), 655–671 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Meth, H., Mueller, B., Maedche, A.: Designing a requirement mining system. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 16(9), 799–837 (2015)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Heinrich, P., Schwabe, G.: Communicating nascent design theories on innovative information systems through multi-grounded design principles. In: Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., Yoon, V. (eds.) DESRIST 2014. LNCS, vol. 8463, pp. 148–163. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gregor, S., Hevner, A.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37(2), 337–355 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Boyce, C., Neale, P.: Conducting in-depth interview: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input (2006)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Haj-Bolouri, A., Bernhardsson, L., Bernhardsson, P.: CollaborGeneous: A Framework of Collaborative IT-Tools for Heterogeneous Groups of Learners. New Horizons in Design Science: Broadening the Research Agenda (2015)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Haj-Bolouri, A., Kruse Chandra, L., Iivari, J., Flensburg, P.: How Habermas’ philosophy can inspire the design of information systems: the case of designing an open learning platform for social integration. Selected Papers of the IRIS, Issue Nr 7. 2 (2016)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Haj-Bolouri, A., Flensburg, P.: Conceptualizing the essence of presence in distance education through digital dasein. Int. J. E-Learn. 16(2), 149–173 (2017)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kensing, F.: Methods and Practices in Participatory Design. IT University Press, Copenhagen (2003)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schuler, D., Namioka, A.: Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1993)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Haj-Bolouri, A., Bernhardsson, L., Bernhardsson, P., Svensson, L.: An information systems design theory for adaptable e-learning. In: 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 4414–4423 (2016)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rittel, H.J.W., Webber, M.W.: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 4(2), 155–169 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics, Business, and ITUniversity WestTrollhättanSweden

Personalised recommendations