Advertisement

Why Should I Trust a Blockchain Platform? Designing for Trust in the Digital Car Dossier

  • Liudmila ZavolokinaEmail author
  • Noah Zani
  • Gerhard Schwabe
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11491)

Abstract

Trust is a crucial component for successful transactions regardless of whether they are executed in physical or virtual spaces. Blockchain technology is often discussed in the context of trust and referred to as a trust-free, trustless, or trustworthy technology. However, the question of how the trustworthiness of blockchain platforms should be demonstrated and proven to end users still remains open. While there may be some genuine trust in the blockchain technology itself, on an application level trust in an IT artifact needs to be established. In this study, we examine how trust-supporting design elements may be implemented to foster an end user’s trust in a blockchain platform. We follow the design science paradigm and suggest a practically useful set of design elements that can help designers of blockchain platforms to build more trustworthy systems.

Keywords

Blockchain Trust Trustworthiness Understandability 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research has been funded by the Innosuisse under the project name “Blockchain Car Dossier”. We thank the project partners for their feedback and involvement.

References

  1. 1.
    Son, J.-Y., Tu, L., Benbasat, I.: A descriptive content analysis of trust-building measures in B2B electronic marketplaces. Commun. AIS 18, 6 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fleischmann, M., Ivens, B.: Exploring the role of trust in blockchain adoption: an inductive approach. In: Proceedings of the 52nd HICSS (2019)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Seebacher, S., Schüritz, R.: Blockchain technology as an enabler of service systems: a structured literature review. In: Za, S., Drăgoicea, M., Cavallari, M. (eds.) IESS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 279, pp. 12–23. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56925-3_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beck, R., Stenum Czepluch, J., Lollike, N., Malone, S.: Blockchain–the gateway to trust-free cryptographic transactions. In: ECIS (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Notheisen, B., Cholewa, J.B., Shanmugam, A.P.: Trading real-world assets on blockchain. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 59, 425–440 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sadhya, V., Sadhya, H., Hirschheim, R., Watson, E.: Exploring technology trust in bitcoin: the blockchain exemplar (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miscione, G., Ziolkowski, R., Zavolokina, L., Schwabe, G.: Tribal governance: The business of blockchain authentication. In: HICSS (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elsden, C., Manohar, A., Briggs, J., Harding, M., Speed, C., Vines, J.: Making sense of blockchain applications: a typology for HCI. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ostern, N., Cabinakova, J.: Pre-prototype testing: empirical insights on the expected usefulness of decentralized identity management systems. Presented at the Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 8 January (2019)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ostern, N.: Do you trust a trust-free transaction? Toward a trust framework model for blockchain technology. Presented at the ICIS (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schlegel, M., Zavolokina, L., Schwabe, G.: Blockchain technologies from the consumers’ perspective: what is there and why should who care? In: HICSS (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koens, T., Poll, E.: The drivers behind blockchain adoption: the rationality of irrational choices. In: Mencagli, G., et al. (eds.) Euro-Par 2018. LNCS, vol. 11339, pp. 535–546. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10549-5_42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Söllner, M., Hoffmann, A., Hoffmann, H., Leimeister, J.M.: How to use behavioral research insights on trust for HCI system design. In: CHI 2012. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morabito, V.: Business Innovation Through Blockchain. Springer, Cham (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leimeister, J.M., Ebner, W., Krcmar, H.: Design, implementation, and evaluation of trust-supporting components in virtual communities for patients. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 21(4), 101–131 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee, J.D., See, K.A.: Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Faems, D., Janssens, M., Madhok, A., Looy, B.V.: Toward an integrative perspective on alliance governance: connecting contract design, trust dynamics, and contract application. Acad. Manag. J. 51, 1053–1078 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20, 709–734 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dirks, K.T., Ferrin, D.L.: The role of trust in organizational settings. Organ. Sci. 12, 450–467 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lewis, W., Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V.: Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: an empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Q., 657–678 (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Williamson, O.E.: Markets and Hierarchies. New York 2630 (1975)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Williamson, O.E.: Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. J. Law Econ. 36, 453–486 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., Perrone, V.: Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. 9, 141–159 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Söllner, M., Hoffmann, A., Leimeister, J.M.: Why different trust relationships matter for information systems users. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 25, 274–287 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Söllner, M., Hoffmann, A., Hoffmann, H., Wacker, A., Leimeister, J.M.: Understanding the formation of trust in IT artifacts. Presented at the ICIS (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoffmann, A., Hoffmann, H., Söllner, M.: Fostering initial trust in applications–developing and evaluating requirement patterns for application websites. In: 21st European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hoffmann, A., Söllner, M., Hoffmann, H., Leimeister, J.M.: Towards trust-based software requirement patterns. In: Requirements Patterns (RePa). IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M.A., McCarthy, J.D.: The mechanics of trust: a framework for research and design. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 62, 381–422 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Loebbecke, C., Lueneborg, L., Niederle, D.: Blockchain technology impacting the role of trust in transactions: reflections in the case of trading diamonds. In: ECIS (2018)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lemieux, V.L.: Trusting records: is Blockchain technology the answer? Rec. Manag. J. 26, 110–139 (2016)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zavolokina, L., Spychiger, F., Tessone, C., Schwabe, G.: Incentivizing data quality in blockchains for inter-organizational networks – learning from the digital car dossier. Presented at the ICIS (2018)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zavolokina, L., Miscione, G., Schwabe, G.: Buyers of lemons: addressing buyers’ needs in the market for lemons with blockchain technology. In: 52nd HICSS, p. 10 (2018)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sadhya, V., Sadhya, H.: Barriers to adoption of blockchain technology (2018)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Auinger, A., Riedl, R.: Blockchain and trust: refuting some widely-held misconceptions. Presented at the ICIS (2018)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Öksüz, A., Walter, N., Pfeiffer, T., Becker, J.: Designing trust in websites-an evaluation of leading infrastructure as a service providers’ websites. In: PACIS, p. 357 (2014)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action design research. MIS Q. 35, 37–56 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bauer, I., Zavolokina, L., Leisibach, F., Schwabe, G.: Exploring blockchain value creation: the case of the car ecosystem. In: Proceedings of the 52th HICSS, p. 10 (2018)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Von Alan, R.H., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Peffers, K., et al.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J., Venable, J.: Soft design science methodology. In: 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (2009)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nunamaker, J.F., Briggs, R.O., Derrick, D.C., Schwabe, G.: The last research mile: achieving both rigor and relevance in information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 32, 10–47 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Anderson, J., Donnellan, B., Hevner, A.: Exploring the relationship between design science research and innovation: a case study of innovation at Chevron. In: Helfert, M., Donnellan, B. (eds.) EDSS 2011. CCIS, vol. 286, pp. 116–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33681-2_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bider, I., Johannesson, P., Perjons, E., Johansson, L.: Design science in action: developing a framework for introducing IT systems into operational practice (2012)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lee, J.S., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: Theorizing in design science research. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds.) DESRIST 2011. LNCS, vol. 6629, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Brown, T., Wyatt, J.: Design thinking for social innovation. Dev. Outreach 12, 29–43 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hevner, A.R.: A three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 4 (2007)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Collier, J.E., Bienstock, C.C.: How do customers judge quality in an e-tailer? MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 48, 35 (2006)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vinkovits, M., Zimmermann, A.: Defining a trust framework design process. In: Furnell, S., Lambrinoudakis, C., Lopez, J. (eds.) TrustBus 2013. LNCS, vol. 8058, pp. 37–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40343-9_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jenkins, M.-C., Churchill, R., Cox, S., Smith, D.: Analysis of user interaction with service oriented chatbot systems. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4552, pp. 76–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73110-8_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Grabner-Kraeuter, S.: The role of consumers’ trust in online-shopping. J. Bus. Ethics 39, 43–50 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chen, L., Pu, P.: Trust building in recommender agents. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Web Personalization, Recommender Systems and Intelligent User Interfaces at the 2nd International Conference on E-Business and Telecommunication Networks. Citeseer (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liudmila Zavolokina
    • 1
    Email author
  • Noah Zani
    • 1
  • Gerhard Schwabe
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations