Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design Science Research for the Humanities – The Case of Prosopography

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Extending the Boundaries of Design Science Theory and Practice (DESRIST 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11491))

Abstract

The humanities focus on understanding human beings and cultures. They include such disciplines as history, literature, and the arts. Digital humanities, defined as the application of IT to research and teaching in the humanities, is well established as a field in its own right. More particularly, research in the humanities is in demand of innovative and useful IT artifacts. This makes it a relevant application area for design science research (DSR). This also raises specific challenges to DSR researchers, due to the specific stakeholders and knowledge domains that come into play in the digital humanities. This paper focuses on prosopography, a branch of digital humanities that represents and interprets historical data, sourced from texts describing historical person’s life. Starting from typical issues addressed by prosopographical researchers, we identify relevant IT artifacts to address these issues, making DSR relevant for prosopographical research. We adapt and instantiate Hevner’s DSR framework to the specific case of prosopography, as a first step towards defining a DSR framework for the humanities more generally. Based on this adapted and instantiated DSR framework, we propose two artifacts: requirements and a methodology for prosopography. We demonstrate the methodology on a prosopography scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Humanities Council of Washington, DC. Defining the humanities – A work in progress (2001). http://www.wdchumanities.org/docs/defininghumanities.pdf

  2. Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations. Digital Humanities 2009 – Call for papers (2009). https://mith.umd.edu/dh09/index.html%3Fpage_id=54.html

  3. Berry, D.M.: Introduction: understanding the digital humanities. In: Berry, D.M. (ed.) Understanding Digital Humanities, pp. 1–20. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371934_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Stone, L.: Prosopography. Daedalus 100(1), 46–79 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hevner, A.R.: A three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19(2), 4 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis. Support Syst. 15(4), 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Winter, R.: Design science research in Europe. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17(5), 470–475 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Samuel-Ojo, O., et al.: Meta-analysis of design science research within the IS community: trends, patterns, and outcomes. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds.) DESRIST 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6105, pp. 124–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Offermann, P., Blom, S., Schönherr, M., Bub, U.: Artifact types in information systems design science – a literature review. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds.) DESRIST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6105, pp. 77–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Sangupamba Mwilu, O., Comyn-Wattiau, I., Prat, N.: Design science research contribution to business intelligence in the cloud – a systematic literature review. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 63, 108–122 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pasin, M., Bradley, J.: Factoid-based prosopography and computer ontologies: towards an integrated approach. Digit. Sch. Humanit. 30(1), 86–97 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bradley, J., Short, H.: Texts into databases: the evolving field of new-style prosopography. Lit. Linguist. Comput. 20(Suppl.), 3–24 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Figueira, L., Vieira, M.: Modelling a Prosopography for the Roman Republic (2017). https://dh2017.adho.org/abstracts/091/091.pdf

  15. Bradley, J., Pasin, M.: Annotation and ontology in most humanities research: accommodating a more informal interpretation context. In: NeDiMaH Ontology Workshop (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Westermann, U., Jain, R.: Toward a common event model for multimedia applications. IEEE Multimedia 14(1), 19–29 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Allen, J.F.: Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Commun. ACM 26(11), 832–843 (1983)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Moisuc, B., Miron, A., Villanova-Olivier, M., Gensel, J.: Spatiotemporal knowledge representation in AROM-ST. In: Innovative Software Development in GIS, pp. 91–119 (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. National Research Council (US): Risk Analysis and Uncertainty in Flood Reduction Studies. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Costa, P.C.G., Laskey, K.B., Blasch, E., Jousselme, A.L.: Towards unbiased evaluation of uncertainty reasoning: the URREF ontology. In: International Conference on Information Fusion (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Akoka, J., Comyn-Wattiau, I., Lamassé, S., Du Mouza, C.: Modeling historical social networks databases. In: Proceedings of the 52nd HICCS Conference (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jarke, M., Pohl, K.: Establishing visions in context: toward a model of requirements processes. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), AIS (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Genet, J.P., Idabal, H., Kouamé, T., Lamassé, S., Priol, C., Tournieroux, A.: General introduction to the stadium project. Mediev. Prosopogr. 31, 156–172 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J., Venable, J.: Soft design science methodology. In: Proceedings of the 4th DESRIST Conference. ACM, p. 9 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Patas, J., Milicevic, D., Goeken, M.: Enhancing design science through empirical knowledge: framework and application. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds.) DESRIST 2011. LNCS, vol. 6629, pp. 32–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Baekgaard, L.: Conceptual model of artifacts for design science research. In: Twenty-First Americas Conference on Information Systems, Puerto Rico (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Braun, R., Benedict, M., Wendler, H., Esswein, W.: Proposal for Requirements Driven Design Science Research. In: Donnellan, B., Helfert, M., Kenneally, J., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Winter, R. (eds.) DESRIST 2015. LNCS, vol. 9073, pp. 135–151. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering. International Computer Science Series. Addison Wesley, Boston (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Verboven, K., Carlier, M., Dumolyn, J.: A short manual to the art of prosopography. In: Keats-Rohan, K.S.B. (ed.) Prosopography Approaches and Applications. A Handbook, pp. 35–69. Unit for Prosopographical Research (Linacre College), Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. De Ridder-Symoens, H.: Prosopografie en middeleeuwse geschiedenis: een onmogelijke mogelijkheid?. Handelingen der Maatschappij voor Geschiedenis en Oudheidkunde te Gent, 45(1) (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Barbero, B.R., Ureta, E.S.: Comparative study of different digitization techniques and their accuracy. Comput.-Aided Des. 43(2), 188–206 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sugumaran, V., Storey, V.C.: The role of domain ontologies in database design: an ontology management and conceptual modeling environment. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 31(3), 1064–1094 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Niehaves, B.: Design science research genres: introduction to the special issue on exemplars and criteria for applicable design science research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 27(2), 129–139 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Prat, N., Comyn-Wattiau, I., Akoka, J.: A taxonomy of evaluation methods for information systems artifacts. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 32(3), 229–267 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been partly funded by a national French grant (ANR Daphne 17-CE28-0013-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CEDRIC-CNAM, Paris, France

    Jacky Akoka & Cédric du Mouza

  2. TEM-Business School, Paris, France

    Jacky Akoka

  3. ESSEC Business School, Cergy, France

    Isabelle Comyn-Wattiau & Nicolas Prat

Authors
  1. Jacky Akoka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Isabelle Comyn-Wattiau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cédric du Mouza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nicolas Prat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Comyn-Wattiau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Foisie Business School, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA

    Bengisu Tulu

  2. Foisie Business School, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA

    Soussan Djamasbi

  3. Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Gondy Leroy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Akoka, J., Comyn-Wattiau, I., du Mouza, C., Prat, N. (2019). Design Science Research for the Humanities – The Case of Prosopography. In: Tulu, B., Djamasbi, S., Leroy, G. (eds) Extending the Boundaries of Design Science Theory and Practice. DESRIST 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11491. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19504-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19504-5_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19503-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19504-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation